Literature DB >> 28686067

Accents, Not Just Prosodic Boundaries, Influence Syntactic Attachment.

Katy Carlson1, Joseph C Tyler1.   

Abstract

Traditionally, pitch accents are understood to relate to the information structure of a sentence and its discourse connections, while prosodic boundaries indicate groupings of words and affect how constituents attach into a syntactic structure. Here, we show that accents also affect syntactic attachment in multiple different syntactic structures. Three auditory questionnaires on ambiguous attachment sentences (such as Tom reported that Bill was bribed [last May]) find that accenting the higher or lower verb ( reported or bribed) increases the attachment of the final adverbial phrase as a modifier of the accented verb. A fourth experiment shows that accents on verbs or object nouns (in sentences like Jenny sketched a child [with crayons]) also increase the attachment of the final prepositional phrase to the accented head (sketched with crayons versus a child with crayons). Accent effects were small but consistent across sentences with different levels of bias and did not depend on prosodic boundaries. The results suggest that focused elements are important to the main assertion of the sentence and therefore draw the attachment of upcoming material (though the salience of attachment sites may also be important). The results also demonstrate that both prosodic phrasing and pitch accents can affect basic syntactic structure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pitch accents; attachment; focus; prosodic boundaries; syntactic ambiguity

Year:  2017        PMID: 28686067      PMCID: PMC5748376          DOI: 10.1177/0023830917712282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  23 in total

Review 1.  Intonational meaning.

Authors:  Pilar Prieto
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-05-27

2.  Effects of pitch accents in attachment ambiguity resolution.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Lee; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2011

3.  Tracking the what and why of speakers' choices: prosodic boundaries and the length of constituents.

Authors:  Charles Clifton; Katy Carlson; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

4.  THE SYNTAX-DISCOURSE DIVIDE: PROCESSING ELLIPSIS.

Authors:  Lyn Frazier; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Syntax       Date:  2005-08

5.  The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation.

Authors:  P J Price; M Ostendorf; S Shattuck-Hufnagel; C Fong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The role of pragmatic principles in resolving attachment ambiguities: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Matrrew J Traxler; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

7.  The influence of prosodic structure on the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities.

Authors:  S R Speer; M M Kjelgaard; K M Dobroth
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-03

8.  Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review.

Authors:  Michael Wagner; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2010-01-01

9.  Informative prosodic boundaries.

Authors:  Charles Clifton; Katy Carlson; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.500

10.  Nonlocal effects of prosodic boundaries.

Authors:  Katy Carlson; Charles Clifton; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Focus Attracts Attachment.

Authors:  Katy Carlson; David Potter
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 1.835

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.