Literature DB >> 19744940

Nonlocal effects of prosodic boundaries.

Katy Carlson1, Charles Clifton, Lyn Frazier.   

Abstract

Placing a prosodic boundary before a phrase may influence its syntactic analysis. However, the boundary's effect depends on the presence, size, and position of other, earlier, prosodic boundaries. In three experiments, we extend previous results about the effect of the position of the early boundary. In sentences in which a final phrase may modify either a local verb or an earlier verb, a boundary immediately after the first verb leads to more first-verb attachments than when the earlier boundary appears in another position between the two verbs (Experiments 1 and 2). This effect cannot be attributed to weaker effects of more distant boundaries (Experiment 2), but is likely due to the first verb being more prominent when a boundary immediately follows it, since similar effects are observed when the verb is accented (Experiment 3). The results support the informative boundary hypothesis and show that the impact of earlier, nonlocal boundaries is not fully uniform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19744940      PMCID: PMC2742769          DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.7.1014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  9 in total

1.  Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension.

Authors:  A J Schafer; S R Speer; P Warren; S D White
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-03

2.  Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: for the speaker or for the addressee?

Authors:  Tanya Kraljic; Susan E Brennan
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension.

Authors:  Lyn Frazier; Katy Carlson; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Tracking the what and why of speakers' choices: prosodic boundaries and the length of constituents.

Authors:  Charles Clifton; Katy Carlson; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

5.  The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation.

Authors:  P J Price; M Ostendorf; S Shattuck-Hufnagel; C Fong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies.

Authors:  E Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

7.  The influence of prosodic structure on the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities.

Authors:  S R Speer; M M Kjelgaard; K M Dobroth
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-03

8.  Informative prosodic boundaries.

Authors:  Charles Clifton; Katy Carlson; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.500

9.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.059

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Effects of pitch accents in attachment ambiguity resolution.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Lee; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2011

2.  Accents, Not Just Prosodic Boundaries, Influence Syntactic Attachment.

Authors:  Katy Carlson; Joseph C Tyler
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 1.500

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.