Literature DB >> 8667298

The influence of prosodic structure on the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities.

S R Speer1, M M Kjelgaard, K M Dobroth.   

Abstract

This paper investigates the influence of prosodic structure on the process of sentence comprehension, with a specific focus on the relative contributions of syntactic and prosodic information to the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities. We argue that prosodic structure provides an initial memory representation for spoken sentences, and that information from this prosodic representation is available to inform syntactic parsing decisions. This view makes three predictions for the processing of temporary syntactic ambiguity: 1. When prosodic and syntactic boundaries coincide, syntactic processing should be facilitated. 2. When prosodic boundaries are placed at misleading points in syntactic structure, syntactic processing should show interference effects. 3. The processing difficulties that have been reliably demonstrated in reading experiments for syntactically complex sentences should disappear when those sentences are presented with a felicitous prosodic structure in listening experiments. These predictions were confirmed by series of experiments measuring end-of-sentence comprehension time and cross-modal naming time for sentences with temporary syntactic closure ambiguities. Sentences with coinciding or conflicting prosodic and syntactic boundaries were compared to a prosodic baseline condition.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8667298     DOI: 10.1007/bf01708573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  4 in total

1.  The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation.

Authors:  P J Price; M Ostendorf; S Shattuck-Hufnagel; C Fong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Creation of prosody during sentence production.

Authors:  F Ferreira
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution [corrected].

Authors:  M C MacDonald; N J Pearlmutter; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding.

Authors:  W Marslen-Wilson; L K Tyler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1980-03
  4 in total
  24 in total

1.  Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension.

Authors:  A J Schafer; S R Speer; P Warren; S D White
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-03

2.  Syntactic, prosodic, and semantic processes in the brain: evidence from event-related neuroimaging.

Authors:  A D Friederici
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-05

3.  Prosodic boundaries, comma rules, and brain responses: the closure positive shift in ERPs as a universal marker for prosodic phrasing in listeners and readers.

Authors:  K Steinhauer; A D Friederici
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-05

4.  Lexical and prosodic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution in aphasia.

Authors:  Gayle DeDe
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-10

5.  Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences.

Authors:  Sun-Ah Jun
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-03

6.  A hierarchical linear modeling analysis of working memory and implicit prosody in the resolution of adjunct attachment ambiguity.

Authors:  Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2009-04-18

7.  Components of speech prosody and their use in detection of syntactic structure by older adults.

Authors:  Ken J Hoyte; Hiram Brownell; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.645

8.  Ways of looking ahead: hierarchical planning in language production.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Lee; Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-09-14

9.  Electrophysiological evidence for the interaction of prosody and thematic fit during sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Shannon M Sheppard; Katherine J Midgley; Tracy Love; Lewis P Shapiro; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Using prosody during sentence processing in aphasia: Evidence from temporal neural dynamics.

Authors:  Shannon M Sheppard; Tracy Love; Katherine J Midgley; Lewis P Shapiro; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.