Literature DB >> 34289730

Focus Attracts Attachment.

Katy Carlson1, David Potter1.   

Abstract

There is growing evidence that pitch accents as well as prosodic boundaries can affect syntactic attachment. But is this an effect of their perceptual salience (the Salience Hypothesis), or is it because accents mark the position of focus (the Focus Attraction Hypothesis)? A pair of auditory comprehension experiments shows that focus position, as indicated by preceding wh-questions instead of by pitch accents, affects attachment by drawing the ambiguous phrase to the focus. This supports the Focus Attraction Hypothesis (or a pragmatic version of salience) for both these results and previous results of accents on attachment. These experiments show that information structure, as indicated with prosody or other means, influences sentence interpretation, and suggests a view on which modifiers are drawn to the most important information in a sentence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Focus; accents; attachment; questions; salience

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34289730      PMCID: PMC8776885          DOI: 10.1177/00238309211033321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.835


  21 in total

1.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The effects of parallelism and prosody in the processing of gapping structures.

Authors:  K Carlson
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.500

3.  Mechanisms for allocating auditory attention: an auditory saliency map.

Authors:  Christoph Kayser; Christopher I Petkov; Michael Lippert; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  THE SYNTAX-DISCOURSE DIVIDE: PROCESSING ELLIPSIS.

Authors:  Lyn Frazier; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Syntax       Date:  2005-08

5.  The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation.

Authors:  P J Price; M Ostendorf; S Shattuck-Hufnagel; C Fong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Recognition memory reveals just how CONTRASTIVE contrastive accenting really is.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Duane G Watson; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Accents, Not Just Prosodic Boundaries, Influence Syntactic Attachment.

Authors:  Katy Carlson; Joseph C Tyler
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 1.500

9.  Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review.

Authors:  Michael Wagner; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2010-01-01

10.  Informative prosodic boundaries.

Authors:  Charles Clifton; Katy Carlson; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.