Literature DB >> 28678492

Experimental Atom-by-Atom Dissection of Amide-Amide and Amide-Hydrocarbon Interactions in H2O.

Xian Cheng1, Irina A Shkel1, Kevin O'Connor1, John Henrich1, Cristen Molzahn1, David Lambert1, M Thomas Record1.   

Abstract

Quantitative information about amide interactions in water is needed to understand their contributions to protein folding and amide effects on aqueous processes and to compare with computer simulations. Here we quantify interactions of urea, alkylated ureas, and other amides by osmometry and amide-aromatic hydrocarbon interactions by solubility. Analysis of these data yields strengths of interaction of ureas and naphthalene with amide sp2O, amide sp2N, aliphatic sp3C, and amide and aromatic sp2C unified atoms in water. Interactions of amide sp2O with urea and naphthalene are favorable, while amide sp2O-alkylurea interactions are unfavorable, becoming more unfavorable with increasing alkylation. Hence, amide sp2O-amide sp2N interactions (proposed n-σ* hydrogen bond) and amide sp2O-aromatic sp2C (proposed n-π*) interactions are favorable in water, while amide sp2O-sp3C interactions are unfavorable. Interactions of all ureas with sp3C and amide sp2N are favorable and increase in strength with increasing alkylation, indicating favorable sp3C-amide sp2N and sp3C-sp3C interactions. Naphthalene results show that aromatic sp2C-amide sp2N interactions in water are unfavorable while sp2C-sp3C interactions are favorable. These results allow interactions of amide and hydrocarbon moieties and effects of urea and alkylureas on aqueous processes to be predicted or interpreted in terms of structural information. We predict strengths of favorable urea-benzene and N-methylacetamide interactions from experimental information to compare with simulations and indicate how amounts of hydrocarbon and amide surfaces buried in protein folding and other biopolymer processes and transition states can be determined from analysis of urea and diethylurea effects on equilibrium and rate constants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28678492      PMCID: PMC5580340          DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b03261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  53 in total

1.  Dynamic hydration shell restores Kauzmann's 1959 explanation of how the hydrophobic factor drives protein folding.

Authors:  Robert L Baldwin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Quantitative assessments of the distinct contributions of polypeptide backbone amides versus side chain groups to chain expansion via chemical denaturation.

Authors:  Alex S Holehouse; Kanchan Garai; Nicholas Lyle; Andreas Vitalis; Rohit V Pappu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Anatomy of energetic changes accompanying urea-induced protein denaturation.

Authors:  Matthew Auton; Luis Marcelo F Holthauzen; D Wayne Bolen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Probing the protein-folding mechanism using denaturant and temperature effects on rate constants.

Authors:  Emily J Guinn; Wayne S Kontur; Oleg V Tsodikov; Irina Shkel; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Separating chemical and excluded volume interactions of polyethylene glycols with native proteins: Comparison with PEG effects on DNA helix formation.

Authors:  Irina A Shkel; D B Knowles; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.505

6.  Interplay of hydrogen bonds and n→π* interactions in proteins.

Authors:  Gail J Bartlett; Robert W Newberry; Brett VanVeller; Ronald T Raines; Derek N Woolfson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Basis of Protein Stabilization by K Glutamate: Unfavorable Interactions with Carbon, Oxygen Groups.

Authors:  Xian Cheng; Emily J Guinn; Evan Buechel; Rachel Wong; Rituparna Sengupta; Irina A Shkel; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  CH/pi interaction in benzene and substituted derivatives with halomethane: a combined density functional and dispersion-corrected density functional study.

Authors:  Ram Chandra Dey; Prasenjit Seal; Swapan Chakrabarti
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 2.781

9.  Quantifying functional group interactions that determine urea effects on nucleic acid helix formation.

Authors:  Emily J Guinn; Jeffrey J Schwinefus; Hyo Keun Cha; Joseph L McDevitt; Wolf E Merker; Ryan Ritzer; Gregory W Muth; Samuel W Engelsgjerd; Kathryn E Mangold; Perry J Thompson; Michael J Kerins; M Thomas Record
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Aspects of Weak Interactions between Folate and Glycine Betaine.

Authors:  Purva P Bhojane; Michael R Duff; Khushboo Bafna; Gabriella P Rimmer; Pratul K Agarwal; Elizabeth E Howell
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  6 in total

1.  Quantitating denaturation by formic acid: imperfect repeats are essential to the stability of the functional amyloid protein FapC.

Authors:  Line Friis Bakmann Christensen; Jan Stanislaw Nowak; Thorbjørn Vincent Sønderby; Signe Andrea Frank; Daniel Erik Otzen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Urea-aromatic interactions in biology.

Authors:  Shampa Raghunathan; Tanashree Jaganade; U Deva Priyakumar
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2020-02-17

3.  Quantifying Interactions of Nucleobase Atoms with Model Compounds for the Peptide Backbone and Glutamine and Asparagine Side Chains in Water.

Authors:  Xian Cheng; Irina A Shkel; Cristen Molzahn; David Lambert; Rezwana Karim; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Atomic view of cosolute-induced protein denaturation probed by NMR solvent paramagnetic relaxation enhancement.

Authors:  Yusuke Okuno; Janghyun Yoo; Charles D Schwieters; Robert B Best; Hoi Sung Chung; G Marius Clore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  How Glutamate Promotes Liquid-liquid Phase Separation and DNA Binding Cooperativity of E. coli SSB Protein.

Authors:  Alexander G Kozlov; Xian Cheng; Hongshan Zhang; Min Kyung Shinn; Elizabeth Weiland; Binh Nguyen; Irina A Shkel; Emily Zytkiewicz; Ilya J Finkelstein; M Thomas Record; Timothy M Lohman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 6.151

6.  Experimentally determined strengths of favorable and unfavorable interactions of amide atoms involved in protein self-assembly in water.

Authors:  Xian Cheng; Irina A Shkel; Kevin O'Connor; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 12.779

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.