Literature DB >> 23510511

Quantifying functional group interactions that determine urea effects on nucleic acid helix formation.

Emily J Guinn1, Jeffrey J Schwinefus, Hyo Keun Cha, Joseph L McDevitt, Wolf E Merker, Ryan Ritzer, Gregory W Muth, Samuel W Engelsgjerd, Kathryn E Mangold, Perry J Thompson, Michael J Kerins, M Thomas Record.   

Abstract

Urea destabilizes helical and folded conformations of nucleic acids and proteins, as well as protein-nucleic acid complexes. To understand these effects, extend previous characterizations of interactions of urea with protein functional groups, and thereby develop urea as a probe of conformational changes in protein and nucleic acid processes, we obtain chemical potential derivatives (μ23 = dμ2/dm3) quantifying interactions of urea (component 3) with nucleic acid bases, base analogues, nucleosides, and nucleotide monophosphates (component 2) using osmometry and hexanol-water distribution assays. Dissection of these μ23 values yields interaction potentials quantifying interactions of urea with unit surface areas of nucleic acid functional groups (heterocyclic aromatic ring, ring methyl, carbonyl and phosphate O, amino N, sugar (C and O); urea interacts favorably with all these groups, relative to interactions with water. Interactions of urea with heterocyclic aromatic rings and attached methyl groups (as on thymine) are particularly favorable, as previously observed for urea-homocyclic aromatic ring interactions. Urea m-values determined for double helix formation by DNA dodecamers near 25 °C are in the range of 0.72-0.85 kcal mol(-1)m(-1) and exhibit little systematic dependence on nucleobase composition (17-42% GC). Interpretation of these results using the urea interaction potentials indicates that extensive (60-90%) stacking of nucleobases in the separated strands in the transition region is required to explain the m-value. Results for RNA and DNA dodecamers obtained at higher temperatures, and literature data, are consistent with this conclusion. This demonstrates the utility of urea as a quantitative probe of changes in surface area (ΔASA) in nucleic acid processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23510511      PMCID: PMC3655208          DOI: 10.1021/ja400965n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  42 in total

1.  Novel computer program for fast exact calculation of accessible and molecular surface areas and average surface curvature.

Authors:  Oleg V Tsodikov; M Thomas Record; Yuri V Sergeev
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Why Hofmeister effects of many salts favor protein folding but not DNA helix formation.

Authors:  Laurel M Pegram; Timothy Wendorff; Robert Erdmann; Irina Shkel; Dana Bellissimo; Daniel J Felitsky; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Thermodynamic origin of hofmeister ion effects.

Authors:  Laurel M Pegram; M Thomas Record
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Use of urea and glycine betaine to quantify coupled folding and probe the burial of DNA phosphates in lac repressor-lac operator binding.

Authors:  Jiang Hong; Mike W Capp; Ruth M Saecker; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Mechanism of bacterial transcription initiation: RNA polymerase - promoter binding, isomerization to initiation-competent open complexes, and initiation of RNA synthesis.

Authors:  Ruth M Saecker; M Thomas Record; Pieter L Dehaseth
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Cation-pi bonding and amino-aromatic interactions in the biomolecular recognition of substituted ammonium ligands.

Authors:  N S Scrutton; A R Raine
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Solution studies of the nucleic acid bases and related model compounds. Solubility in aqueous urea and amide solutions.

Authors:  T T Herskovits; J J Bowen
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1974-12-31       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Separation of preferential interaction and excluded volume effects on DNA duplex and hairpin stability.

Authors:  D B Knowles; Andrew S LaCroix; Nickolas F Deines; Irina Shkel; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Denaturant m values and heat capacity changes: relation to changes in accessible surface areas of protein unfolding.

Authors:  J K Myers; C N Pace; J M Scholtz
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Human telomerase RNA pseudoknot and hairpin thermal stability with glycine betaine and urea: preferential interactions with RNA secondary and tertiary structures.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Schwinefus; Mikhail J Kuprian; John W Lamppa; Wolf E Merker; Kristin N Dorn; Gregory W Muth
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  19 in total

1.  Quantitative assessments of the distinct contributions of polypeptide backbone amides versus side chain groups to chain expansion via chemical denaturation.

Authors:  Alex S Holehouse; Kanchan Garai; Nicholas Lyle; Andreas Vitalis; Rohit V Pappu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Dispersion interactions between urea and nucleobases contribute to the destabilization of RNA by urea in aqueous solution.

Authors:  Koushik Kasavajhala; Swetha Bikkina; Indrajit Patil; Alexander D MacKerell; U Deva Priyakumar
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Probing the protein-folding mechanism using denaturant and temperature effects on rate constants.

Authors:  Emily J Guinn; Wayne S Kontur; Oleg V Tsodikov; Irina Shkel; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Urea-aromatic interactions in biology.

Authors:  Shampa Raghunathan; Tanashree Jaganade; U Deva Priyakumar
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2020-02-17

5.  The mechanism and high-free-energy transition state of lac repressor-lac operator interaction.

Authors:  Rituparna Sengupta; Michael W Capp; Irina A Shkel; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Quantifying Interactions of Nucleobase Atoms with Model Compounds for the Peptide Backbone and Glutamine and Asparagine Side Chains in Water.

Authors:  Xian Cheng; Irina A Shkel; Cristen Molzahn; David Lambert; Rezwana Karim; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Chemical Interactions of Polyethylene Glycols (PEGs) and Glycerol with Protein Functional Groups: Applications to Effects of PEG and Glycerol on Protein Processes.

Authors:  D B Knowles; Irina A Shkel; Noel M Phan; Matt Sternke; Emily Lingeman; Xian Cheng; Lixue Cheng; Kevin O'Connor; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Quantifying additive interactions of the osmolyte proline with individual functional groups of proteins: comparisons with urea and glycine betaine, interpretation of m-values.

Authors:  Roger C Diehl; Emily J Guinn; Michael W Capp; Oleg V Tsodikov; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Quantifying the temperature dependence of glycine-betaine RNA duplex destabilization.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Schwinefus; Ryan J Menssen; James M Kohler; Elliot C Schmidt; Alexandra L Thomas
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Experimental Atom-by-Atom Dissection of Amide-Amide and Amide-Hydrocarbon Interactions in H2O.

Authors:  Xian Cheng; Irina A Shkel; Kevin O'Connor; John Henrich; Cristen Molzahn; David Lambert; M Thomas Record
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.