Literature DB >> 33087561

Experimentally determined strengths of favorable and unfavorable interactions of amide atoms involved in protein self-assembly in water.

Xian Cheng1,2, Irina A Shkel2,3, Kevin O'Connor2, M Thomas Record4,2,3.   

Abstract

Folding and other protein self-assembly processes are driven by favorable interactions between O, N, and C unified atoms of the polypeptide backbone and side chains. These processes are perturbed by solutes that interact with these atoms differently than water does. Amide NH···O=C hydrogen bonding and various π-system interactions have been better characterized structurally or by simulations than experimentally in water, and unfavorable interactions are relatively uncharacterized. To address this situation, we previously quantified interactions of alkyl ureas with amide and aromatic compounds, relative to interactions with water. Analysis yielded strengths of interaction of each alkylurea with unit areas of different hybridization states of unified O, N, and C atoms of amide and aromatic compounds. Here, by osmometry, we quantify interactions of 10 pairs of amides selected to complete this dataset. An analysis yields intrinsic strengths of six favorable and four unfavorable atom-atom interactions, expressed per unit area of each atom and relative to interactions with water. The most favorable interactions are sp2O-sp2C (lone pair-π, presumably n-π*), sp2C-sp2C (π-π and/or hydrophobic), sp2O-sp2N (hydrogen bonding) and sp3C-sp2C (CH-π and/or hydrophobic). Interactions of sp3C with itself (hydrophobic) and with sp2N are modestly favorable, while sp2N interactions with sp2N and with amide/aromatic sp2C are modestly unfavorable. Amide sp2O-sp2O interactions and sp2O-sp3C interactions are more unfavorable, indicating the preference of amide sp2O to interact with water. These intrinsic interaction strengths are used to predict interactions of amides with proteins and chemical effects of amides (including urea, N-ethylpyrrolidone [NEP], and polyvinylpyrrolidone [PVP]) on protein stability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  additivity; amide atom interactions; aqueous interactions; preferential interactions; thermodynamics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33087561      PMCID: PMC7959557          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2012481117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  43 in total

1.  Quantifying why urea is a protein denaturant, whereas glycine betaine is a protein stabilizer.

Authors:  Emily J Guinn; Laurel M Pegram; Michael W Capp; Michelle N Pollock; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Direct detection of CH/pi interactions in proteins.

Authors:  Michael J Plevin; David L Bryce; Jérôme Boisbouvier
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 24.427

3.  Anatomy of energetic changes accompanying urea-induced protein denaturation.

Authors:  Matthew Auton; Luis Marcelo F Holthauzen; D Wayne Bolen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Thermodynamic origin of hofmeister ion effects.

Authors:  Laurel M Pegram; M Thomas Record
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 5.  Control of protein stability and reactions by weakly interacting cosolvents: the simplicity of the complicated.

Authors:  S N Timasheff
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  1998

Review 6.  The n → π* interaction: a rapidly emerging non-covalent interaction.

Authors:  Santosh K Singh; Aloke Das
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.676

7.  Coupling of local folding to site-specific binding of proteins to DNA.

Authors:  R S Spolar; M T Record
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-02-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Hofmeister salt effects on surface tension arise from partitioning of anions and cations between bulk water and the air-water interface.

Authors:  Laurel M Pegram; M Thomas Record
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  n-->pi* interactions in proteins.

Authors:  Gail J Bartlett; Amit Choudhary; Ronald T Raines; Derek N Woolfson
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 15.040

10.  Quantifying functional group interactions that determine urea effects on nucleic acid helix formation.

Authors:  Emily J Guinn; Jeffrey J Schwinefus; Hyo Keun Cha; Joseph L McDevitt; Wolf E Merker; Ryan Ritzer; Gregory W Muth; Samuel W Engelsgjerd; Kathryn E Mangold; Perry J Thompson; Michael J Kerins; M Thomas Record
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  2 in total

1.  Atomic view of cosolute-induced protein denaturation probed by NMR solvent paramagnetic relaxation enhancement.

Authors:  Yusuke Okuno; Janghyun Yoo; Charles D Schwieters; Robert B Best; Hoi Sung Chung; G Marius Clore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  How Glutamate Promotes Liquid-liquid Phase Separation and DNA Binding Cooperativity of E. coli SSB Protein.

Authors:  Alexander G Kozlov; Xian Cheng; Hongshan Zhang; Min Kyung Shinn; Elizabeth Weiland; Binh Nguyen; Irina A Shkel; Emily Zytkiewicz; Ilya J Finkelstein; M Thomas Record; Timothy M Lohman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 6.151

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.