Literature DB >> 29533642

Quantifying Interactions of Nucleobase Atoms with Model Compounds for the Peptide Backbone and Glutamine and Asparagine Side Chains in Water.

Xian Cheng, Irina A Shkel, Cristen Molzahn, David Lambert, Rezwana Karim, M Thomas Record.   

Abstract

Alkylureas display hydrocarbon and amide groups, the primary functional groups of proteins. To obtain the thermodynamic information that is needed to analyze interactions of amides and proteins with nucleobases and nucleic acids, we quantify preferential interactions of alkylureas with nucleobases differing in the amount and composition of water-accessible surface area (ASA) by solubility assays. Using an established additive ASA-based analysis, we interpret these thermodynamic results to determine interactions of each alkylurea with five types of nucleobase unified atoms (carbonyl sp2O, amino sp3N, ring sp2N, methyl sp3C, and ring sp2C). All alkylureas interact favorably with nucleobase sp2C and sp3C atoms; these interactions become more favorable with an increasing level of alkylation of urea. Interactions with nucleobase sp2O are most favorable for urea, less favorable for methylurea and ethylurea, and unfavorable for dialkylated ureas. Contributions to overall alkylurea-nucleobase interactions from interactions with each nucleobase atom type are proportional to the ASA of that atom type with proportionality constant (interaction strength) α, as observed previously for urea. Trends in α-values for interactions of alkylureas with nucleobase atom types parallel those for corresponding amide compound atom types, offset because nucleobase α-values are more favorable. Comparisons between ethylated and methylated ureas show interactions of amide compound sp3C with nucleobase sp2C, sp3C, sp2N, and sp3N atoms are favorable while amide sp3C-nucleobase sp2O interactions are unfavorable. Strongly favorable interactions of urea with nucleobase sp2O but weakly favorable interactions with nucleobase sp3N indicate that amide sp2N-nucleobase sp2O and nucleobase sp3N-amide sp2O hydrogen bonding (NH···O═C) interactions are favorable while amide sp2N-nucleobase sp3N interactions are unfavorable. These favorable amide-nucleobase hydrogen bonding interactions are prevalent in specific protein-nucleotide complexes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29533642      PMCID: PMC5903953          DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  38 in total

1.  On the molecular discrimination between adenine and guanine by proteins.

Authors:  I Nobeli; R A Laskowski; W S Valdar; J M Thornton
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Why Hofmeister effects of many salts favor protein folding but not DNA helix formation.

Authors:  Laurel M Pegram; Timothy Wendorff; Robert Erdmann; Irina Shkel; Dana Bellissimo; Daniel J Felitsky; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sequence-specific recognition of double helical nucleic acids by proteins.

Authors:  N C Seeman; J M Rosenberg; A Rich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Quantitative assessments of the distinct contributions of polypeptide backbone amides versus side chain groups to chain expansion via chemical denaturation.

Authors:  Alex S Holehouse; Kanchan Garai; Nicholas Lyle; Andreas Vitalis; Rohit V Pappu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Probing the protein-folding mechanism using denaturant and temperature effects on rate constants.

Authors:  Emily J Guinn; Wayne S Kontur; Oleg V Tsodikov; Irina Shkel; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Solution studies of the nucleic acid bases and related model compounds. Solubility in aqueous urea and amide solutions.

Authors:  T T Herskovits; J J Bowen
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1974-12-31       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Can simulations quantitatively predict peptide transfer free energies to urea solutions? Thermodynamic concepts and force field limitations.

Authors:  Dominik Horinek; Roland R Netz
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.781

8.  Basis of Protein Stabilization by K Glutamate: Unfavorable Interactions with Carbon, Oxygen Groups.

Authors:  Xian Cheng; Emily J Guinn; Evan Buechel; Rachel Wong; Rituparna Sengupta; Irina A Shkel; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Quantifying functional group interactions that determine urea effects on nucleic acid helix formation.

Authors:  Emily J Guinn; Jeffrey J Schwinefus; Hyo Keun Cha; Joseph L McDevitt; Wolf E Merker; Ryan Ritzer; Gregory W Muth; Samuel W Engelsgjerd; Kathryn E Mangold; Perry J Thompson; Michael J Kerins; M Thomas Record
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations of netropsin and distamycin binding to an AAAAA DNA binding site.

Authors:  Jozica Dolenc; Chris Oostenbrink; Joze Koller; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  Experimentally determined strengths of favorable and unfavorable interactions of amide atoms involved in protein self-assembly in water.

Authors:  Xian Cheng; Irina A Shkel; Kevin O'Connor; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 12.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.