Literature DB >> 28645855

Training Surgical Residents With a Haptic Robotic Central Venous Catheterization Simulator.

David F Pepley1, Adam B Gordon1, Mary A Yovanoff2, Katelin A Mirkin3, Scarlett R Miller4, David C Han3, Jason Z Moore5.   

Abstract

OJECTIVE: Ultrasound guided central venous catheterization (CVC) is a common surgical procedure with complication rates ranging from 5 to 21 percent. Training is typically performed using manikins that do not simulate anatomical variations such as obesity and abnormal vessel positioning. The goal of this study was to develop and validate the effectiveness of a new virtual reality and force haptic based simulation platform for CVC of the right internal jugular vein.
DESIGN: A CVC simulation platform was developed using a haptic robotic arm, 3D position tracker, and computer visualization. The haptic robotic arm simulated needle insertion force that was based on cadaver experiments. The 3D position tracker was used as a mock ultrasound device with realistic visualization on a computer screen. Upon completion of a practice simulation, performance feedback is given to the user through a graphical user interface including scoring factors based on good CVC practice. The effectiveness of the system was evaluated by training 13 first year surgical residents using the virtual reality haptic based training system over a 3 month period.
RESULTS: The participants' performance increased from 52% to 96% on the baseline training scenario, approaching the average score of an expert surgeon: 98%. This also resulted in improvement in positive CVC practices including a 61% decrease between final needle tip position and vein center, a decrease in mean insertion attempts from 1.92 to 1.23, and a 12% increase in time spent aspirating the syringe throughout the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: A virtual reality haptic robotic simulator for CVC was successfully developed. Surgical residents training on the simulation improved to near expert levels after three robotic training sessions. This suggests that this system could act as an effective training device for CVC.
Copyright © 2017 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; central venous catheterization; computer simulation; haptic feedback; surgical education; virtual reality

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28645855      PMCID: PMC5732878          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  23 in total

Review 1.  Complications of central venous catheters: internal jugular versus subclavian access--a systematic review.

Authors:  Sibylle Ruesch; Bernhard Walder; Martin R Tramèr
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Low- to high-fidelity simulation - a continuum of medical education?

Authors:  N J Maran; R J Glavin
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 3.  Preventing complications of central venous catheterization.

Authors:  David C McGee; Michael K Gould
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Simulation training in central venous catheter insertion: improved performance in clinical practice.

Authors:  Leigh V Evans; Kelly L Dodge; Tanya D Shah; Lewis J Kaplan; Mark D Siegel; Christopher L Moore; Cara J Hamann; Zhenqiu Lin; Gail D'Onofrio
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Simulation training and its effect on long-term resident performance in central venous catheterization.

Authors:  C Christopher Smith; Grace C Huang; Lori R Newman; Peter F Clardy; David Feller-Kopman; Michael Cho; Trustin Ennacheril; Richard M Schwartzstein
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.929

Review 6.  The role of medical simulation: an overview.

Authors:  Kevin Kunkler
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.547

7.  Anatomical variation of the internal jugular vein and its impact on temporary haemodialysis vascular access: an ultrasonographic survey in uraemic patients.

Authors:  B S Lin; C W Kong; D C Tarng; T P Huang; G J Tang
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.992

8.  US-guided puncture of the internal jugular vein: complications and anatomic considerations.

Authors:  A C Gordon; J C Saliken; D Johns; R Owen; R R Gray
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Central vein catheterization. Failure and complication rates by three percutaneous approaches.

Authors:  J I Sznajder; F R Zveibil; H Bitterman; P Weiner; S Bursztein
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1986-02

10.  An unseen danger: frequency of posterior vessel wall penetration by needles during attempts to place internal jugular vein central catheters using ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  Michael Blaivas; Srikar Adhikari
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  7 in total

1.  Looks can be deceiving: Gaze pattern differences between novices and experts during placement of central lines.

Authors:  Hong-En Chen; Cheyenne C Sonntag; David F Pepley; Rohan S Prabhu; David C Han; Jason Z Moore; Scarlett R Miller
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Investigating the Effect of Simulator Functional Fidelity and Personalized Feedback on Central Venous Catheterization Training.

Authors:  Mary A Yovanoff; Hong-En Chen; David F Pepley; Katelin A Mirkin; David C Han; Jason Z Moore; Scarlett R Miller
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.891

3.  FUN AND GAMES: DESIGNING A GAMIFIED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION TRAINING SIMULATOR.

Authors:  Haroula M Tzamaras; Jason Martinez; Dailen C Brown; Jessica M Gonzalez-Vargas; Jason Z Moore; Scarlett R Miller
Journal:  Proc Int Symp Hum Factors Ergon Healthc       Date:  2021-11-12

4.  Going the (social) distance: Comparing the effectiveness of online versus in-person Internal Jugular Central Venous Catheterization procedural training.

Authors:  Jessica M Gonzalez-Vargas; Haroula M Tzamaras; Jason Martinez; Dailen C Brown; Jason Z Moore; David C Han; Elizabeth Sinz; Philip Ng; Michael X Yang; Scarlett R Miller
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.125

5.  Can Eye Tracking be Used to Predict Performance Improvements in Simulated Medical Training? A Case Study in Central Venous Catheterization.

Authors:  Hong-En Chen; Rucha R Bhide; David F Pepley; Cheyenne C Sonntag; Jason Z Moore; David C Han; Scarlett R Miller
Journal:  Proc Int Symp Hum Factors Ergon Healthc       Date:  2019-09-15

6.  From the simulation center to the bedside: Validating the efficacy of a dynamic haptic robotic trainer in internal jugular central venous catheter placement.

Authors:  Hong-En Chen; Cheyenne C Sonntag; Katelin A Mirkin; David F Pepley; David C Han; Jason Z Moore; Scarlett R Miller
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 7.  How, for Whom, and in Which Contexts or Conditions Augmented and Virtual Reality Training Works in Upskilling Health Care Workers: Realist Synthesis.

Authors:  Norina Gasteiger; Sabine N van der Veer; Paul Wilson; Dawn Dowding
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.143

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.