Literature DB >> 3947185

Central vein catheterization. Failure and complication rates by three percutaneous approaches.

J I Sznajder, F R Zveibil, H Bitterman, P Weiner, S Bursztein.   

Abstract

We prospectively studied the results of 714 attempts at central venous catheterization during an eight-month period in our intensive care department. We compared the rates of failure of catheterization and early complications among three percutaneous approaches: subclavian, anterior jugular, and posterior jugular veins. The procedures were performed by experienced staff or resident physicians and inexperienced interns and residents under teaching supervision. Overall rates of failure and complication were similar for each percutaneous approach within each group of physicians. Overall failure rate was 10.1% for the experienced group and 19.4% for the inexperienced. The complication was 5.4% for experienced and 11% for inexperienced. Among inexperienced physicians, the success rate was 86.7% and the complication rate 7.6% in unconscious patients, whereas in conscious patients these rates were 70.5% and 13.8%, respectively. The inexperienced physicians caused fewer complications in mechanically ventilated than in spontaneously breathing patients. We suggest that inexperienced physicians should first attempt central vein catheterizations in unconscious and mechanically ventilated patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3947185     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.146.2.259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  114 in total

1.  Problems with temporary cardiac pacing. Ultrasonography can aid central venous cannulation.

Authors:  Paul Jefferson; Vincent Perkins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-12

2.  Looks can be deceiving: Gaze pattern differences between novices and experts during placement of central lines.

Authors:  Hong-En Chen; Cheyenne C Sonntag; David F Pepley; Rohan S Prabhu; David C Han; Jason Z Moore; Scarlett R Miller
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Central venous access in intensive care unit patients: is the subclavian vein the royal route?

Authors:  Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Massive extrapleural hematoma after attempted internal jugular vein cannulation.

Authors:  C Fun Gee; K K Fah; D Png
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Creating and evaluating a data-driven curriculum for central venous catheter placement.

Authors:  James R Duncan; Katherine Henderson; Mandie Street; Amy Richmond; Mary Klingensmith; Elio Beta; Andrea Vannucci; David Murray
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-09

6.  Evaluating Surgical Resident Needle Insertion Skill Gains in Central Venous Catheterization Training.

Authors:  Hong-En Chen; Mary A Yovanoff; David F Pepley; Rohan S Prabhu; Cheyenne C Sonntag; David C Han; Jason Z Moore; Scarlett R Miller
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 7.  Should ultrasound guidance be used for central venous catheterisation in the emergency department?

Authors:  P Atkinson; A Boyle; S Robinson; G Campbell-Hewson
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Central venous cannulation: are routine chest radiographs necessary after B-mode and colour Doppler sonography check?

Authors:  Cecilia Lanza; Marco Russo; Giancarlo Fabrizzi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-10-03

Review 9.  Ultrasonography as a guide during vascular access procedures and in the diagnosis of complications.

Authors:  A Vezzani; T Manca; A Vercelli; A Braghieri; A Magnacavallo
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2013-10-29

10.  Emergency central venous catheterization revisited.

Authors:  Sandeep Sahu; Indu Lata; Shikha Sachan; R K Singh
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2009-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.