PURPOSE: To determine whether simulation training of ultrasound (US)-guided central venous catheter (CVC) insertion skills on a partial task trainer improves cannulation and insertion success rates in clinical practice. METHOD: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study of first- and second-year residents occurred at a tertiary care teaching hospital from January 2007 to September 2008. The intervention group (n = 90) received a didactic and hands-on, competency-based simulation training course in US-guided CVC insertion, whereas the control group (n = 95) received training through a traditional, bedside apprenticeship model. Success at first cannulation and successful CVC insertion served as the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included reduction in technical errors and decreased mechanical complications. RESULTS: Blinded independent raters observed 495 CVC insertions by 115 residents over a 21-month period. Successful first cannulation occurred in 51% of the intervention group versus 37% of the control group (P = .03). CVC insertion success occurred for 78% of the intervention group versus 67% of the control group (P = .02). Simulation training was independently and significantly associated with success at first cannulation (odds ratio: 1.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.1-2.8) and with successful CVC insertion (odds ratio: 1.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.1-2.8)--both independent of US use, patient comorbidities, or resident specialty. No significant differences related to technical errors or mechanical complications existed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS:Simulation training was associated with improved in-hospital performance of CVC insertion. Procedural simulation was associated with improved residents' skills and was more effective than traditional training.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To determine whether simulation training of ultrasound (US)-guided central venous catheter (CVC) insertion skills on a partial task trainer improves cannulation and insertion success rates in clinical practice. METHOD: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study of first- and second-year residents occurred at a tertiary care teaching hospital from January 2007 to September 2008. The intervention group (n = 90) received a didactic and hands-on, competency-based simulation training course in US-guided CVC insertion, whereas the control group (n = 95) received training through a traditional, bedside apprenticeship model. Success at first cannulation and successful CVC insertion served as the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included reduction in technical errors and decreased mechanical complications. RESULTS: Blinded independent raters observed 495 CVC insertions by 115 residents over a 21-month period. Successful first cannulation occurred in 51% of the intervention group versus 37% of the control group (P = .03). CVC insertion success occurred for 78% of the intervention group versus 67% of the control group (P = .02). Simulation training was independently and significantly associated with success at first cannulation (odds ratio: 1.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.1-2.8) and with successful CVC insertion (odds ratio: 1.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.1-2.8)--both independent of US use, patient comorbidities, or resident specialty. No significant differences related to technical errors or mechanical complications existed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation training was associated with improved in-hospital performance of CVC insertion. Procedural simulation was associated with improved residents' skills and was more effective than traditional training.
Authors: Hong-En Chen; Cheyenne C Sonntag; David F Pepley; Rohan S Prabhu; David C Han; Jason Z Moore; Scarlett R Miller Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Riley Hoyer; Russel Means; Jeffrey Robertson; Douglas Rappaport; Charles Schmier; Travis Jones; Lori Ann Stolz; Stephen Jerome Kaplan; William Joaquin Adamas-Rappaport; Richard Amini Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2015-08-15 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: David Frederick Pepley; Cheyenne Cassel Sonntag; Rohan Sunil Prabhu; Mary Alice Yovanoff; David C Han; Scarlett Rae Miller; Jason Zachary Moore Journal: Simul Healthc Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 1.929
Authors: Mary Yovanoff; David Pepley; Katelin Mirkin; Jason Moore; David Han; Scarlett Miller Journal: Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet Date: 2017-09-28
Authors: Eli M Miloslavsky; Emily M Hayden; Paul F Currier; Susan K Mathai; Fernando Contreras-Valdes; James A Gordon Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2012-12