Jessica M Gonzalez-Vargas1, Haroula M Tzamaras1, Jason Martinez2, Dailen C Brown3, Jason Z Moore3, David C Han4, Elizabeth Sinz5, Philip Ng6, Michael X Yang6, Scarlett R Miller7. 1. Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Penn State, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. 2. Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA. 3. Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Penn State, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. 4. Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA; Penn State Heart and Vascular Institute, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA. 5. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA. 6. Department of Internal Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA. 7. Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Penn State, University Park, PA, 16802, USA; School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs, Penn State, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. Electronic address: scarlettmiller@psu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study compares surgical residents' knowledge acquisition of ultrasound-guided Internal Jugular Central Venous Catheterization (US-IJCVC) between in-person and online procedural training cohorts before receiving independent in-person Dynamic Haptic Robotic Simulation training. METHODS: Three surgical residency procedural training cohorts, two in-person (N = 26) and one online (N = 14), were compared based on their performance on a 24-item US-IJCVC evaluation checklist completed by an expert physician completed after training. Pre- and post-training US-IJCVC knowledge was also compared for the online cohort. RESULTS: No significant change in the pass rates on the US-IJCVC checklist was found between in-person and online cohorts (p = 0.208). There were differences in the Economy of Time and Motion between in-person and online cohorts (p < 0.005). The online cohort had significant increases in US-IJCVC knowledge pre-to post-training (p < 0.008). CONCLUSION: Online training with independent simulation practice was as effective as in-person training for US-IJCVC.
BACKGROUND: This study compares surgical residents' knowledge acquisition of ultrasound-guided Internal Jugular Central Venous Catheterization (US-IJCVC) between in-person and online procedural training cohorts before receiving independent in-person Dynamic Haptic Robotic Simulation training. METHODS: Three surgical residency procedural training cohorts, two in-person (N = 26) and one online (N = 14), were compared based on their performance on a 24-item US-IJCVC evaluation checklist completed by an expert physician completed after training. Pre- and post-training US-IJCVC knowledge was also compared for the online cohort. RESULTS: No significant change in the pass rates on the US-IJCVC checklist was found between in-person and online cohorts (p = 0.208). There were differences in the Economy of Time and Motion between in-person and online cohorts (p < 0.005). The online cohort had significant increases in US-IJCVC knowledge pre-to post-training (p < 0.008). CONCLUSION: Online training with independent simulation practice was as effective as in-person training for US-IJCVC.
Authors: Elizabeth R Berger; Lindsey Kreutzer; Amy Halverson; Anthony D Yang; Stephen Reinhart; Kevin J O' Leary; Mark V Williams; Karl Y Bilimoria; Julie K Johnson Journal: J Surg Educ Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 2.891
Authors: Mary A Yovanoff; Hong-En Chen; David F Pepley; Katelin A Mirkin; David C Han; Jason Z Moore; Scarlett R Miller Journal: J Surg Educ Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 2.891
Authors: Thomas D Milner; Saleh Okhovat; Mark McGuigan; William A Clement; Thushitha Kunanandam Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Richard J Parent; Timothy A Plerhoples; Eliza E Long; Danielle M Zimmer; Mediget Teshome; Catherine J Mohr; Daphne P Ly; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Myriam J Curet; Sanjeev Dutta Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Hong-En Chen; Cheyenne C Sonntag; Katelin A Mirkin; David F Pepley; David C Han; Jason Z Moore; Scarlett R Miller Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Falco Hietbrink; Shahin Mohseni; Diego Mariani; Päl Aksel Naess; Cristina Rey-Valcárcel; Alan Biloslavo; Gary A Bass; Susan I Brundage; Henrique Alexandrino; Ruben Peralta; Luke P H Leenen; Tina Gaarder Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 2.374