Literature DB >> 28615471

Clostridium difficile PCR Cycle Threshold Predicts Free Toxin.

Fiona Senchyna1, Rajiv L Gaur1, Saurabh Gombar1, Cynthia Y Truong1, Lee F Schroeder2, Niaz Banaei3,4,5.   

Abstract

There is no stand-alone Clostridium difficile diagnostic that can sensitively and rapidly detect fecal free toxins. We investigated the performance of the C. difficile PCR cycle threshold (CT ) for predicting free toxin status. Consecutive stool samples (n = 312) positive for toxigenic C. difficile by the GeneXpert C. difficile/Epi tcdB PCR assay were tested with the rapid membrane C. Diff Quik Chek Complete immunoassay (RMEIA). RMEIA toxin-negative samples were tested with the cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA) and tgcBIOMICS enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Using RMEIA alone or in combination with CCNA and/or ELISA as the reference method, the accuracy of CT was measured at different CT cutoffs. Using RMEIA as the reference method, a CT cutoff of 26.35 detected toxin-positive samples with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 96.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.2% to 98.9%), 65.9% (95% CI, 59.0% to 72.2%), 57.4% (95% CI, 52.7% to 62%), and 97.1% (95% CI, 92.8% to 98.9), respectively. Inclusion of CCNA in the reference method improved CT specificity to 78.0% (95% CI, 70.7% to 84.2%). Intercartridge lot CT variability measured as the average coefficient of variation was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.2% to 3.2%). Standardizing the input stool volume did not improve CT toxin specificity. The median CT values were not significantly different between stool samples with Bristol scores of 5, 6, and 7, between pediatric and adult samples, or between presumptive 027 and non-027 strains. In addition to sensitively detecting toxigenic C. difficile in stool, on-demand PCR may also be used to accurately predict toxin-negative stool samples, thus providing additional results in PCR-positive stool samples to guide therapy.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridium difficile; EIA; PCR; cycle threshold; free toxin; free toxins

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28615471      PMCID: PMC5648702          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00563-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  26 in total

1.  Clinical and infection control implications of Clostridium difficile infection with negative enzyme immunoassay for toxin.

Authors:  Dubert M Guerrero; Christina Chou; Lucy A Jury; Michelle M Nerandzic; Jennifer C Cadnum; Curtis J Donskey
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Gut check: Clostridium difficile testing and treatment in the molecular testing era.

Authors:  Whitney R Buckel; Edina Avdic; Karen C Carroll; Vidhya Gunaseelan; Eric Hadhazy; Sara E Cosgrove
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.254

3.  Point-Counterpoint: What Is the Optimal Approach for Detection of Clostridium difficile Infection?

Authors:  Ferric C Fang; Christopher R Polage; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the diagnostic guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  M J T Crobach; T Planche; C Eckert; F Barbut; E M Terveer; O M Dekkers; M H Wilcox; E J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  Purification and characterization of toxins A and B of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  N M Sullivan; S Pellett; T D Wilkins
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 6.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.

Authors:  Carey-Ann D Burnham; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Clostridium difficile Infection Is More Severe When Toxin Is Detected in the Stool than When Detected Only by a Toxigenic Culture.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Shimizu; Masaaki Mori; Noboru Yoshimoto
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 1.271

8.  Performance of Clostridium difficile toxin enzyme immunoassay and nucleic acid amplification tests stratified by patient disease severity.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Daniel Z Uslan; Zachary Rubin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Overdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection in the Molecular Test Era.

Authors:  Christopher R Polage; Clare E Gyorke; Michael A Kennedy; Jhansi L Leslie; David L Chin; Susan Wang; Hien H Nguyen; Bin Huang; Yi-Wei Tang; Lenora W Lee; Kyoungmi Kim; Sandra Taylor; Patrick S Romano; Edward A Panacek; Parker B Goodell; Jay V Solnick; Stuart H Cohen
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Clinical and laboratory evaluation of a real-time PCR for Clostridium difficile toxin A and B genes.

Authors:  E de Jong; A S de Jong; C J M Bartels; C van der Rijt-van den Biggelaar; W J G Melchers; P D J Sturm
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  30 in total

1.  Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridium difficile Toxins Reveals Suboptimal Accuracy of Toxin Gene Cycle Thresholds for Toxin Predictions.

Authors:  Johanna Sandlund; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  High Agreement Between an Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Assay and a C. difficile Laboratory Algorithm Utilizing GDH-and-Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays and Cytotoxin Testing.

Authors:  Marie L Landry; Jeffrey E Topal; Joel Estis; Phoebe Katzenbach; Niamh Nolan; Johanna Sandlund
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Quantitation as Predictor of Toxin Presence in Clostridium difficile Infection.

Authors:  M J T Crobach; N Duszenko; E M Terveer; C M Verduin; E J Kuijper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Guidelines Support the Value of Stand-Alone Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection.

Authors:  Fred C Tenover; David H Persing; Ferric Fang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Toxin B PCR Amplification Cycle Threshold Adds Little to Clinical Variables for Predicting Outcomes in Clostridium difficile Infection: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Julia Origüen; María Ángeles Orellana; Mario Fernández-Ruiz; Laura Corbella; Rafael San Juan; María Ruiz-Ruigómez; Francisco López-Medrano; Manuel Lizasoain; Tamara Ruiz-Merlo; Guillermo Maestro-de la Calle; Patricia Parra; Jennifer Villa; Rafael Delgado; José María Aguado
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Potential of real-time PCR threshold cycle (CT) to predict presence of free toxin and clinically relevant C. difficile infection (CDI) in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Mini Kamboj; Jennifer Brite; Tracy McMillen; Elizabeth Robilotti; Alejandro Herrera; Kent Sepkowitz; N Esther Babady
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 6.072

7.  Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins A and B by Use of Automated Single-Molecule Counting Technology.

Authors:  Johanna Sandlund; Amelita Bartolome; Anna Almazan; Stanley Tam; Sheryl Biscocho; Salina Abusali; Jeffrey J Bishop; Niamh Nolan; Joel Estis; John Todd; Stephen Young; Fiona Senchyna; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of Cycle Threshold, Toxin Concentration, and Clinical Characteristics of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients with Discordant Diagnostic Test Results.

Authors:  Megan D Shah; Joan-Miquel Balada-Llasat; Kelci Coe; Erica Reed; Johanna Sandlund; Preeti Pancholi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Toxin positivity and tcdB gene load in broad-spectrum Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Hyeong Nyeon Kim; Hanah Kim; Hee-Won Moon; Mina Hur; Yeo-Min Yun
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.553

10.  PCR cycle threshold to assess a diagnostic stewardship intervention for C. difficile testing.

Authors:  Gregory R Madden; Melinda D Poulter; Costi D Sifri
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 6.072

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.