Hyeong Nyeon Kim1, Hanah Kim1, Hee-Won Moon2, Mina Hur1, Yeo-Min Yun1. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1, Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 05030, Korea. 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1, Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 05030, Korea. hannasis@hanmail.net.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of toxin positivity and toxin gene load, and the relation between them in the broad spectrum of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) including colonization, significant diarrhea, and severe disease. METHODS: We included 2671 fecal samples submitted for CDI diagnosis and 180 samples from healthy individuals. The clinical spectrum was categorized as category I (toxigenic C. difficile positive without clinical CDI criteria), category II (mild CDI), and category III (severe CDI). Clinical parameters were compared based on toxin EIA and tcdB C t values. C t values of tcdB PCR for predicting toxin EIA positivity were assessed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: The median C t values of tcdB PCR and toxin positivity were not significantly correlated with clinical spectrum of CDI (27.5, 28.2, and 26.1 for tcdB C t and 55.0, 56.6, and 60.9% for toxin EIA positivity in category I, II, and III, respectively, P > 0.05). There were significant differences in the tcdB C t values between toxin EIA-positive and -negative groups (P < 0.001). Optimal cutoff for the tcdB C t value for estimating toxin EIA positivity was 26.3 with 79.3% sensitivity and 83.6% specificity with good area under the curves (AUC, 0.848). CONCLUSIONS: The C t values successfully predicted toxin EIA positivity and could be used as a surrogate for toxin EIA positivity in the diagnostic algorithm and routine analysis. Further studies are needed to validate the clinical significance of tcdB PCR C t value in toxigenic C. difficile colonization and infection.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of toxin positivity and toxin gene load, and the relation between them in the broad spectrum of Clostridium difficileinfection (CDI) including colonization, significant diarrhea, and severe disease. METHODS: We included 2671 fecal samples submitted for CDI diagnosis and 180 samples from healthy individuals. The clinical spectrum was categorized as category I (toxigenic C. difficile positive without clinical CDI criteria), category II (mild CDI), and category III (severe CDI). Clinical parameters were compared based on toxin EIA and tcdB C t values. C t values of tcdB PCR for predicting toxin EIA positivity were assessed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: The median C t values of tcdB PCR and toxin positivity were not significantly correlated with clinical spectrum of CDI (27.5, 28.2, and 26.1 for tcdB C t and 55.0, 56.6, and 60.9% for toxin EIA positivity in category I, II, and III, respectively, P > 0.05). There were significant differences in the tcdB C t values between toxin EIA-positive and -negative groups (P < 0.001). Optimal cutoff for the tcdB C t value for estimating toxin EIA positivity was 26.3 with 79.3% sensitivity and 83.6% specificity with good area under the curves (AUC, 0.848). CONCLUSIONS: The C t values successfully predicted toxin EIA positivity and could be used as a surrogate for toxin EIA positivity in the diagnostic algorithm and routine analysis. Further studies are needed to validate the clinical significance of tcdB PCR C t value in toxigenic C. difficile colonization and infection.
Authors: Carey-Ann D Burnham; Erik R Dubberke; Larry K Kociolek; Christopher R Polage; Thomas V Riley Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Christina M Surawicz; Lawrence J Brandt; David G Binion; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Scott R Curry; Peter H Gilligan; Lynne V McFarland; Mark Mellow; Brian S Zuckerbraun Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: M J T Crobach; T Planche; C Eckert; F Barbut; E M Terveer; O M Dekkers; M H Wilcox; E J Kuijper Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: Nira R Pollock; Alice Banz; Xinhua Chen; David Williams; Hua Xu; Christine A Cuddemi; Alice X Cui; Matthew Perrotta; Eaman Alhassan; Brigitte Riou; Aude Lantz; Mark A Miller; Ciaran P Kelly Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Glen Hansen; Stephen Young; Alan H B Wu; Emily Herding; Vickie Nordberg; Ray Mills; Christen Griego-Fullbright; Aaron Wagner; Chui Mei Ong; Shawna Lewis; Joseph Yoon; Joel Estis; Johanna Sandlund; Emily Friedland; Karen C Carroll Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 5.948