Literature DB >> 27460910

European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the diagnostic guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection.

M J T Crobach1, T Planche2, C Eckert3, F Barbut3, E M Terveer1, O M Dekkers4, M H Wilcox5, E J Kuijper6.   

Abstract

In 2009 the first European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) guideline for diagnosing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) was launched. Since then newer tests for diagnosing CDI have become available, especially nucleic acid amplification tests. The main objectives of this update of the guidance document are to summarize the currently available evidence concerning laboratory diagnosis of CDI and to formulate and revise recommendations to optimize CDI testing. This update is essential to improve the diagnosis of CDI and to improve uniformity in CDI diagnosis for surveillance purposes among Europe. An electronic search for literature concerning the laboratory diagnosis of CDI was performed. Studies evaluating a commercial laboratory test compared to a reference test were also included in a meta-analysis. The commercial tests that were evaluated included enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) detecting glutamate dehydrogenase, EIAs detecting toxins A and B and nucleic acid amplification tests. Recommendations were formulated by an executive committee, and the strength of recommendations and quality of evidence were graded using the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. No single commercial test can be used as a stand-alone test for diagnosing CDI as a result of inadequate positive predictive values at low CDI prevalence. Therefore, the use of a two-step algorithm is recommended. Samples without free toxin detected by toxins A and B EIA but with positive glutamate dehydrogenase EIA, nucleic acid amplification test or toxigenic culture results need clinical evaluation to discern CDI from asymptomatic carriage.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridium difficile infection; diagnosis; guideline; recommendations; review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27460910     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  127 in total

1.  Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Capsules with Targeted Colonic Versus Gastric Delivery in Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Comparative Cohort Analysis of High and Lose Dose.

Authors:  Jessica R Allegretti; Monika Fischer; Sashidhar V Sagi; Matthew E Bohm; Hala M Fadda; Sejal R Ranmal; Shrish Budree; Abdul W Basit; Dean L Glettig; Eva L de la Serna; Amanda Gentile; Ylaine Gerardin; Sonia Timberlake; Rotem Sadovsky; Mark Smith; Zain Kassam
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Clostridioides difficile laboratory diagnostic techniques: a comparative approach of rapid and molecular methods.

Authors:  Thais Simões Camargo; Moacyr Silva Junior; Luis Fernando Aranha Camargo; Veronica Pivetta Biotto; André Mario Doi; Paula Celia Mariko Koga; Carolina Nunes França; Marines Dalla Valle Martino
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 2.552

Review 3.  Primary Prevention of Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea: Current Controversies and Future Tools.

Authors:  Zachary A Rubin; Elise M Martin; Paul Allyn
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.725

4.  Clostridium difficile PCR Cycle Threshold Predicts Free Toxin.

Authors:  Fiona Senchyna; Rajiv L Gaur; Saurabh Gombar; Cynthia Y Truong; Lee F Schroeder; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Impact of Clostridium difficile toxin gene PCR result on decisions to de-isolate patients: Do the ends justify the means?

Authors:  Kirsti A Morris; Kerrie Davies; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2018-02-16

6.  The impact of technical and clinical factors on fecal microbiota transfer outcomes for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections in Germany.

Authors:  Rosemarie Peri; Rebeca Cruz Aguilar; Kester Tüffers; Andreas Erhardt; Alexander Link; Philipp Ehlermann; Wolfgang Angeli; Thorsten Frank; Martin Storr; Thomas Glück; Andreas Sturm; Ulrich Rosien; Frank Tacke; Oliver Bachmann; Philipp Solbach; Andreas Stallmach; Felix Goeser; Maria Jgt Vehreschild
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  Point-Counterpoint: What Is the Optimal Approach for Detection of Clostridium difficile Infection?

Authors:  Ferric C Fang; Christopher R Polage; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Toxin positivity and tcdB gene load in broad-spectrum Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Hyeong Nyeon Kim; Hanah Kim; Hee-Won Moon; Mina Hur; Yeo-Min Yun
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  Prognosis of Clostridium difficile infection in adult oncohaematological patients: experience from a large prospective observational study.

Authors:  Isabel Ruiz-Camps; Benito Almirante; Thais Larrainzar-Coghen; Dolors Rodríguez-Pardo; Pere Barba; Juan Aguilar-Company; Virginia Rodríguez; Gloria Roig; Carmen Ferrer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 10.  Understanding Clostridium difficile Colonization.

Authors:  Monique J T Crobach; Jonathan J Vernon; Vivian G Loo; Ling Yuan Kong; Séverine Péchiné; Mark H Wilcox; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 26.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.