Literature DB >> 32051264

Evaluation of Cycle Threshold, Toxin Concentration, and Clinical Characteristics of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients with Discordant Diagnostic Test Results.

Megan D Shah1, Joan-Miquel Balada-Llasat2, Kelci Coe3, Erica Reed1, Johanna Sandlund4, Preeti Pancholi5.   

Abstract

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common health care-associated infections that can cause significant morbidity and mortality. CDI diagnosis involves laboratory testing in conjunction with clinical assessment. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of various C. difficile tests and to compare clinical characteristics, Xpert C. difficile/Epi (PCR) cycle threshold (CT ), and Singulex Clarity C. diff toxins A/B (Clarity) concentrations between groups with discordant test results. Unformed stool specimens from 200 hospitalized adults (100 PCR positive and 100 negative) were tested by cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA), C. diff Quik Chek Complete (Quik Chek), Premier Toxins A and B, and Clarity. Clinical data, including CDI severity and CDI risk factors, were compared between discordant test results. Compared to CCNA, PCR had the highest sensitivity at 100% and Quik Chek had the highest specificity at 100%. Among clinical and laboratory data studied, prevalences of leukocytosis, prior antibiotic use, and hospitalizations were consistently higher across all subgroups in comparisons of toxin-positive to toxin-negative patients. Among PCR-positive samples, the median CT was lower in toxin-positive samples than in toxin-negative samples; however, CT ranges overlapped. Among Clarity-positive samples, the quantitative toxin concentration was significantly higher in toxin-positive samples than in toxin-negative samples as determined by CCNA and Quik Chek Toxin A and B. Laboratory tests for CDI vary in sensitivity and specificity. The quantitative toxin concentration may offer value in guiding CDI diagnosis and treatment. The presence of leukocytosis, prior antibiotic use, and previous hospitalizations may assist with CDI diagnosis, while other clinical parameters may not be consistently reliable.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCNA; CDI; Clostridioides difficilezzm321990; PCR; Quik Chek; Singulex Clarity; clinical characteristics; cycle threshold; toxin concentration; ultrasensitive toxin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32051264      PMCID: PMC7180257          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01681-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  27 in total

Review 1.  Outcome of metronidazole therapy for Clostridium difficile disease and correlation with a scoring system.

Authors:  Jaime Belmares; Dale N Gerding; Jorge P Parada; Scott Miskevics; Frances Weaver; Stuart Johnson
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 6.072

2.  Clostridium difficile PCR Cycle Threshold Predicts Free Toxin.

Authors:  Fiona Senchyna; Rajiv L Gaur; Saurabh Gombar; Cynthia Y Truong; Lee F Schroeder; Niaz Banaei
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Clostridium difficile: its disease and toxins.

Authors:  D M Lyerly; H C Krivan; T D Wilkins
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Comparison of the clinical course of Clostridium difficile infection in glutamate dehydrogenase-positive toxin-negative patients diagnosed by PCR to those with a positive toxin test.

Authors:  J Origüen; L Corbella; M Á Orellana; M Fernández-Ruiz; F López-Medrano; R San Juan; M Lizasoain; T Ruiz-Merlo; A Morales-Cartagena; G Maestro; P Parra; J Villa; R Delgado; J M Aguado
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 5.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.

Authors:  Carey-Ann D Burnham; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Clinical and laboratory characteristics of Clostridium difficile infection in patients with discordant diagnostic test results.

Authors:  Anna Kaltsas; Matt Simon; Larissa H Unruh; Crystal Son; Danielle Wroblewski; Kimberlee A Musser; Kent Sepkowitz; N Esther Babady; Mini Kamboj
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Performance of Clostridium difficile toxin enzyme immunoassay and nucleic acid amplification tests stratified by patient disease severity.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Daniel Z Uslan; Zachary Rubin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Overdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection in the Molecular Test Era.

Authors:  Christopher R Polage; Clare E Gyorke; Michael A Kennedy; Jhansi L Leslie; David L Chin; Susan Wang; Hien H Nguyen; Bin Huang; Yi-Wei Tang; Lenora W Lee; Kyoungmi Kim; Sandra Taylor; Patrick S Romano; Edward A Panacek; Parker B Goodell; Jay V Solnick; Stuart H Cohen
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Can a toxin gene NAAT be used to predict toxin EIA and the severity of Clostridium difficile infection?

Authors:  Mark I Garvey; Craig W Bradley; Martyn A C Wilkinson; Elisabeth Holden
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.887

Review 10.  Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Zhong Peng; Lifen Ling; Charles W Stratton; Chunhui Li; Christopher R Polage; Bin Wu; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 7.163

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clostridioides difficile Toxin B PCR Cycle Threshold as a Predictor of Toxin Testing in Stool Specimens from Hospitalized Adults.

Authors:  Sean Lee; Neha Nanda; Kenichiro Yamaguchi; Yelim Lee; Rosemary C She
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.