Literature DB >> 32857855

LET-Dependent Intertrack Yields in Proton Irradiation at Ultra-High Dose Rates Relevant for FLASH Therapy.

J Ramos-Méndez1, N Domínguez-Kondo2, J Schuemann3, A McNamara3, E Moreno-Barbosa2, Bruce Faddegon1.   

Abstract

FLASH radiotherapy delivers a high dose (≥10 Gy) at a high rate (≥40 Gy/s). In this way, particles are delivered in pulses as short as a few nanoseconds. At that rate, intertrack reactions between chemical species produced within the same pulse may affect the heterogeneous chemistry stage of water radiolysis. This stochastic process suits the capabilities of the Monte Carlo method, which can model intertrack effects to aid in radiobiology research, including the design and interpretation of experiments. In this work, the TOPAS-nBio Monte Carlo track-structure code was expanded to allow simulations of intertrack effects in the chemical stage of water radiolysis. Simulation of the behavior of radiolytic yields over a long period of time (up to 50 s) was verified by simulating radiolysis in a Fricke dosimeter irradiated by 60Co γ rays. In addition, LET-dependent G values of protons delivered in single squared pulses of widths, 1 ns, 1 µs and 10 µs, were obtained and compared to simulations using no intertrack considerations. The Fricke simulation for the calculated G value of Fe3+ ion at 50 s was within 0.4% of the accepted value from ICRU Report 34. For LET-dependent G values at the end of the chemical stage, intertrack effects were significant at LET values below 2 keV/µm. Above 2 keV/µm the reaction kinetics remained limited locally within each track and thus, effects of intertrack reactions remained low. Therefore, when track structure simulations are used to investigate the biological damage of FLASH irradiation, these intertrack reactions should be considered. The TOPAS-nBio framework with the expansion to intertrack chemistry simulation provides a useful tool to assist in this task. ©2020 by Radiation Research Society. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32857855      PMCID: PMC7644138          DOI: 10.1667/RADE-20-00084.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  40 in total

1.  A computational model of radiolytic oxygen depletion during FLASH irradiation and its effect on the oxygen enhancement ratio.

Authors:  Guillem Pratx; Daniel S Kapp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Cellular Response to Proton Irradiation: A Simulation Study with TOPAS-nBio.

Authors:  Hongyu Zhu; Aimee L McNamara; Stephen J McMahon; Jose Ramos-Mendez; Nicholas T Henthorn; Bruce Faddegon; Kathryn D Held; Joseph Perl; Junli Li; Harald Paganetti; Jan Schuemann
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  The Advantage of FLASH Radiotherapy Confirmed in Mini-pig and Cat-cancer Patients.

Authors:  Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Pauline De Fornel; Kristoffer Petersson; Patrick Devauchelle; Jean Bourhis; Vincent Favaudon; Maud Jaccard; Jean-François Germond; Benoit Petit; Marco Burki; Gisèle Ferrand; David Patin; Hanan Bouchaab; Mahmut Ozsahin; François Bochud; Claude Bailat
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  A Monte-Carlo step-by-step simulation code of the non-homogeneous chemistry of the radiolysis of water and aqueous solutions--Part II: calculation of radiolytic yields under different conditions of LET, pH, and temperature.

Authors:  Ianik Plante
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  The effects of ultra-high dose rate proton irradiation on growth delay in the treatment of human tumor xenografts in nude mice.

Authors:  O Zlobinskaya; C Siebenwirth; C Greubel; V Hable; R Hertenberger; N Humble; S Reinhardt; D Michalski; B Röper; G Multhoff; G Dollinger; J J Wilkens; T E Schmid
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Effect of electron energy on the radiation chemistry of liquid water.

Authors:  S M Pimblott; J A LaVerne
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  A direct comparison of water calorimetry and Fricke dosimetry.

Authors:  C K Ross; N V Klassen; K R Shortt; G D Smith
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  In Silico Non-Homologous End Joining Following Ion Induced DNA Double Strand Breaks Predicts That Repair Fidelity Depends on Break Density.

Authors:  N T Henthorn; J W Warmenhoven; M Sotiropoulos; R I Mackay; N F Kirkby; K J Kirkby; M J Merchant
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Impact of Target Oxygenation on the Chemical Track Evolution of Ion and Electron Radiation.

Authors:  Daria Boscolo; Michael Krämer; Martina C Fuss; Marco Durante; Emanuele Scifoni
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  A Quantitative Analysis of the Role of Oxygen Tension in FLASH Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Kristoffer Petersson; Gabriel Adrian; Karl Butterworth; Stephen J McMahon
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 8.013

View more
  6 in total

1.  Impact of DNA Geometry and Scoring on Monte Carlo Track-Structure Simulations of Initial Radiation-Induced Damage.

Authors:  Alejandro Bertolet; José Ramos-Méndez; Aimee McNamara; Dohyeon Yoo; Samuel Ingram; Nicholas Henthorn; John-William Warmenhoven; Bruce Faddegon; Michael Merchant; Stephen J McMahon; Harald Paganetti; Jan Schuemann
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.372

2.  TOPAS-nBio validation for simulating water radiolysis and DNA damage under low-LET irradiation.

Authors:  J Ramos-Méndez; J A LaVerne; N Domínguez-Kondo; J Milligan; V Štěpán; K Stefanová; Y Perrot; C Villagrasa; W-G Shin; S Incerti; A McNamara; H Paganetti; J Perl; J Schuemann; B Faddegon
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 4.174

3.  Development of Ultra-High Dose-Rate (FLASH) Particle Therapy.

Authors:  Michele M Kim; Arash Darafsheh; Jan Schuemann; Ivana Dokic; Olle Lundh; Tianyu Zhao; José Ramos-Méndez; Lei Dong; Kristoffer Petersson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-22

4.  Significant changes in yields of 7-hydroxy-coumarin-3-carboxylic acid produced under FLASH radiotherapy conditions.

Authors:  Tamon Kusumoto; Hisashi Kitamura; Satoru Hojo; Teruaki Konishi; Satoshi Kodaira
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 5.  A roadmap to clinical trials for FLASH.

Authors:  Paige A Taylor; Jean M Moran; David A Jaffray; Jeffrey C Buchsbaum
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.506

6.  A Mechanistic DNA Repair and Survival Model (Medras): Applications to Intrinsic Radiosensitivity, Relative Biological Effectiveness and Dose-Rate.

Authors:  Stephen Joseph McMahon; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.