Literature DB >> 28587476

Do the New FDA Guidance Documents Help Improving Performance of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Compared With ISO 15197?

Guido Freckmann1, Annette Baumstark1, Stefan Pleus1.   

Abstract

Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published guidance documents for point-of-care testing (POCT) and over-the-counter (OTC) blood glucose monitoring systems (BGMS). These are expected to improve weaknesses of the already established ISO 15197:2013 standard accuracy evaluation for OTC BGMS; however, the proposed criteria and procedures rather raise new questions. As an example, the OTC guidance stipulates tighter accuracy criteria in the low glycemic range than the POCT guidance for no obvious reason. Furthermore, a clear definition of requirements for the reference method is missing under consideration of the strict accuracy criteria. External surveillance of BGMS after introduction to the market is an issue that is addressed neither in the FDA documents, nor in ISO 15197, but in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline POCT12-A3.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CLSI guideline; FDA guidance; ISO 15197; POCT; SMBG; blood glucose monitoring system

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28587476      PMCID: PMC5951049          DOI: 10.1177/1932296817713220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  8 in total

1.  A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose.

Authors:  J L Parkes; S L Slatin; S Pardo; B H Ginsberg
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Fundamental Importance of Reference Glucose Analyzer Accuracy for Evaluating the Performance of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (BGMSs).

Authors:  Timothy S Bailey; Leslie J Klaff; Jane F Wallace; Carmine Greene; Scott Pardo; Bern Harrison; David A Simmons
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-28

3.  System Accuracy Evaluation of Four Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Following ISO 15197 Using a Glucose Oxidase and a Hexokinase-Based Comparison Method.

Authors:  Manuela Link; Christina Schmid; Stefan Pleus; Annette Baumstark; Delia Rittmeyer; Cornelia Haug; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-14

4.  The surveillance error grid.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Courtney Lias; Robert Vigersky; William Clarke; Joan Lee Parkes; David B Sacks; M Sue Kirkman; Boris Kovatchev
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-13

Review 5.  Performance of Cleared Blood Glucose Monitors.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Priya Prahalad
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-08

6.  System Accuracy Evaluation of Different Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013 by Using Two Different Comparison Methods.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Manuela Link; Christina Schmid; Stefan Pleus; Annette Baumstark; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 6.118

7.  Plasma glucose measurement with the Yellow Springs Glucose 2300 STAT and the Olympus AU640.

Authors:  P J Twomey
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Development of the Diabetes Technology Society Blood Glucose Monitor System Surveillance Protocol.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Courtney Lias; Stayce Beck; Joan Lee Parkes; Boris Kovatchev; Robert A Vigersky; Guillermo Arreaza-Rubin; Robert D Burk; Aaron Kowalski; Randie Little; James Nichols; Matt Petersen; Kelly Rawlings; David B Sacks; Eric Sampson; Steve Scott; Jane Jeffrie Seley; Robbert Slingerland; Hubert W Vesper
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-03
  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Analysis of "Capillary and Venous Blood Glucose Accuracy in Blood Glucose Meters Versus Reference Standards: The Impact of Study Design on Accuracy Evaluations".

Authors:  Gary H Thorpe
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-09-15

2.  Impact of Two Different Reference Measurement Procedures on Apparent System Accuracy of 18 CE-Marked Current-Generation Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Annette Baumstark; Nina Jendrike; Jochen Mende; Sebastian Schauer; Manuela Link; Stefan Pleus; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-19

3.  Capillary and Venous Blood Glucose Accuracy in Blood Glucose Meters Versus Reference Standards: The Impact of Study Design on Accuracy Evaluations.

Authors:  Kirsty Macleod; Laurence B Katz; Hilary Cameron
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08-07

4.  Do We Need the Replacement of YSI 2300? A View from the Clinical Laboratory.

Authors:  Loukia Spanou; Konstantinos Makris
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-05-17

Review 5.  Technologies for Diabetes Self-Monitoring: A Scoping Review and Assessment Using the REASSURED Criteria.

Authors:  Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka; David Beran; Beatrice Vetter; Rangarajan Sampath; Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-09

6.  Accuracy and stability of an arterial sensor for glucose monitoring in a porcine model using glucose clamp technique.

Authors:  Felix Aberer; Verena Theiler-Schwetz; Haris Ziko; Bettina Hausegger; Iris Wiederstein-Grasser; Daniel A Hochfellner; Philipp Eller; Georg Tomberger; Martin Ellmerer; Julia K Mader; Vladimir Bubalo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Glucose biosensors in clinical practice: principles, limits and perspectives of currently used devices.

Authors:  Salvatore Andrea Pullano; Marta Greco; Maria Giovanna Bianco; Daniela Foti; Antonio Brunetti; Antonino S Fiorillo
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 11.600

Review 8.  Self-measurement of Blood Glucose and Continuous Glucose Monitoring - Is There Only One Future?

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Andreas Stuhr; Adam Brown; Guido Freckmann; Marc D Breton; Steven Russell; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  Eur Endocrinol       Date:  2018-09-10

9.  Impact of Glucose Measuring Systems and Sample Type on Diagnosis Rates of Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Markus Gabriel Blaurock; Anders Kallner; Stefan Menzel; Annette Masuch; Matthias Nauck; Astrid Petersmann
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.945

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.