Literature DB >> 28566464

Activation of ganglion cells and axon bundles using epiretinal electrical stimulation.

Lauren E Grosberg1, Karthik Ganesan2, Georges A Goetz3, Sasidhar S Madugula3, Nandita Bhaskhar2, Victoria Fan3, Peter Li4, Pawel Hottowy5, Wladyslaw Dabrowski5, Alexander Sher6, Alan M Litke6, Subhasish Mitra2, E J Chichilnisky3.   

Abstract

Epiretinal prostheses for treating blindness activate axon bundles, causing large, arc-shaped visual percepts that limit the quality of artificial vision. Improving the function of epiretinal prostheses therefore requires understanding and avoiding axon bundle activation. This study introduces a method to detect axon bundle activation on the basis of its electrical signature and uses the method to test whether epiretinal stimulation can directly elicit spikes in individual retinal ganglion cells without activating nearby axon bundles. Combined electrical stimulation and recording from isolated primate retina were performed using a custom multielectrode system (512 electrodes, 10-μm diameter, 60-μm pitch). Axon bundle signals were identified by their bidirectional propagation, speed, and increasing amplitude as a function of stimulation current. The threshold for bundle activation varied across electrodes and retinas, and was in the same range as the threshold for activating retinal ganglion cells near their somas. In the peripheral retina, 45% of electrodes that activated individual ganglion cells (17% of all electrodes) did so without activating bundles. This permitted selective activation of 21% of recorded ganglion cells (7% of expected ganglion cells) over the array. In one recording in the central retina, 75% of electrodes that activated individual ganglion cells (16% of all electrodes) did so without activating bundles. The ability to selectively activate a subset of retinal ganglion cells without axon bundles suggests a possible novel architecture for future epiretinal prostheses.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Large-scale multielectrode recording and stimulation were used to test how selectively retinal ganglion cells can be electrically activated without activating axon bundles. A novel method was developed to identify axon activation on the basis of its unique electrical signature and was used to find that a subset of ganglion cells can be activated at single-cell, single-spike resolution without producing bundle activity in peripheral and central retina. These findings have implications for the development of advanced retinal prostheses.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  axon bundles; brain-machine interface; raphe; retinal electrophysiology; retinal ganglion cells; retinal prosthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28566464      PMCID: PMC5596129          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00750.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  50 in total

1.  Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation.

Authors:  Devyani Nanduri; Ione Fine; Alan Horsager; Geoffrey M Boynton; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; James D Weiland
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation.

Authors:  S I Fried; H A Hsueh; F S Werblin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The slow wave component of retinal activity in rd/rd mice recorded with a multi-electrode array.

Authors:  J H Ye; Y S Goo
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Functional stability of retinal ganglion cells after degeneration-induced changes in synaptic input.

Authors:  David J Margolis; Gregory Newkirk; Thomas Euler; Peter B Detwiler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design.

Authors:  Chris Sekirnjak; Pawel Hottowy; Alexander Sher; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Anatomical identification of extracellularly recorded cells in large-scale multielectrode recordings.

Authors:  Peter H Li; Jeffrey L Gauthier; Max Schiff; Alexander Sher; Daniel Ahn; Greg D Field; Martin Greschner; Edward M Callaway; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Physiological response of mouse retinal ganglion cells to electrical stimulation: effect of soma size.

Authors:  Alice K Cho; Alapakkam P Sampath; James D Weiland
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

8.  Focal electrical stimulation of major ganglion cell types in the primate retina for the design of visual prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren H Jepson; Pawel Hottowy; Keith Mathieson; Deborah E Gunning; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with an ultrafine, extracellular microelectrode.

Authors:  Ralph J Jensen; Joseph F Rizzo; Ofer R Ziv; Andrew Grumet; John Wyatt
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Functional connectivity in the retina at the resolution of photoreceptors.

Authors:  Greg D Field; Jeffrey L Gauthier; Alexander Sher; Martin Greschner; Timothy A Machado; Lauren H Jepson; Jonathon Shlens; Deborah E Gunning; Keith Mathieson; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Liam Paninski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  15 in total

1.  Epiretinal stimulation with local returns enhances selectivity at cellular resolution.

Authors:  Victoria H Fan; Lauren E Grosberg; Sasidhar S Madugula; Pawel Hottowy; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alexander Sher; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Spatially patterned bi-electrode epiretinal stimulation for axon avoidance at cellular resolution.

Authors:  Ramandeep S Vilkhu; Sasidhar S Madugula; Lauren E Grosberg; Alex R Gogliettino; Pawel Hottowy; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alexander Sher; Alan M Litke; Subhasish Mitra; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Morphological Factors that Underlie Neural Sensitivity to Stimulation in the Retina.

Authors:  Vineeth Raghuram; Paul Werginz; Shelley I Fried; Brian P Timko
Journal:  Adv Nanobiomed Res       Date:  2021-09-01

4.  Optimization of pillar electrodes in subretinal prosthesis for enhanced proximity to target neurons.

Authors:  Thomas Flores; Xin Lei; Tiffany Huang; Henri Lorach; Roopa Dalal; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore Kamins; Keith Mathieson; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Minimizing activation of overlying axons with epiretinal stimulation: The role of fiber orientation and electrode configuration.

Authors:  Timothy B Esler; Robert R Kerr; Bahman Tahayori; David B Grayden; Hamish Meffin; Anthony N Burkitt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Electrical stimulus artifact cancellation and neural spike detection on large multi-electrode arrays.

Authors:  Gonzalo E Mena; Lauren E Grosberg; Sasidhar Madugula; Paweł Hottowy; Alan Litke; John Cunningham; E J Chichilnisky; Liam Paninski
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  In Vivo Photovoltaic Performance of a Silicon Nanowire Photodiode-Based Retinal Prosthesis.

Authors:  Brandon Bosse; Samir Damle; Abraham Akinin; Yi Jing; Dirk-Uwe Bartsch; Lingyun Cheng; Nicholas Oesch; Yu-Hwa Lo; Gert Cauwenberghs; William R Freeman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  A model of ganglion axon pathways accounts for percepts elicited by retinal implants.

Authors:  Michael Beyeler; Devyani Nanduri; James D Weiland; Ariel Rokem; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Single-Cell Electrical Stimulation Using CMOS-Based High-Density Microelectrode Arrays.

Authors:  Silvia Ronchi; Michele Fiscella; Camilla Marchetti; Vijay Viswam; Jan Müller; Urs Frey; Andreas Hierlemann
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Stimulation and Artifact-Suppression Techniques for In Vitro High-Density Microelectrode Array Systems.

Authors:  Amir Shadmani; Vijay Viswam; Yihui Chen; Raziyeh Bounik; Jelena Dragas; Milos Radivojevic; Sydney Geissler; Sergey Sitnikov; Jan Muller; Andreas Hierlemann
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.