Literature DB >> 28559322

Estimating the parameters of background selection and selective sweeps in Drosophila in the presence of gene conversion.

José Luis Campos1, Lei Zhao2, Brian Charlesworth3.   

Abstract

We used whole-genome resequencing data from a population of Drosophila melanogaster to investigate the causes of the negative correlation between the within-population synonymous nucleotide site diversity (πS ) of a gene and its degree of divergence from related species at nonsynonymous nucleotide sites (KA ). By using the estimated distributions of mutational effects on fitness at nonsynonymous and UTR sites, we predicted the effects of background selection at sites within a gene on πS and found that these could account for only part of the observed correlation between πS and KA We developed a model of the effects of selective sweeps that included gene conversion as well as crossing over. We used this model to estimate the average strength of selection on positively selected mutations in coding sequences and in UTRs, as well as the proportions of new mutations that are selectively advantageous. Genes with high levels of selective constraint on nonsynonymous sites were found to have lower strengths of positive selection and lower proportions of advantageous mutations than genes with low levels of constraint. Overall, background selection and selective sweeps within a typical gene reduce its synonymous diversity to ∼75% of its value in the absence of selection, with larger reductions for genes with high KA Gene conversion has a major effect on the estimates of the parameters of positive selection, such that the estimated strength of selection on favorable mutations is greatly reduced if it is ignored.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; background selection; gene conversion; selective sweeps; sequence diversity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28559322      PMCID: PMC5474792          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1619434114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  59 in total

1.  Effect of strong directional selection on weakly selected mutations at linked sites: implication for synonymous codon usage.

Authors:  Yuseob Kim
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Soft sweeps: molecular population genetics of adaptation from standing genetic variation.

Authors:  Joachim Hermisson; Pleuni S Pennings
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Genetic recombination and molecular evolution.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; A J Betancourt; V B Kaiser; I Gordo
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2009-09-04

4.  The effect of gene conversion on intralocus associations.

Authors:  P Andolfatto; M Nordborg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Evolution of 5' untranslated region length and gene expression reprogramming in yeasts.

Authors:  Zhenguo Lin; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster.

Authors:  D J Begun; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Variation in the Intensity of Selection on Codon Bias over Time Causes Contrasting Patterns of Base Composition Evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  Benjamin C Jackson; José L Campos; Penelope R Haddrill; Brian Charlesworth; Kai Zeng
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Population Genomics of sub-saharan Drosophila melanogaster: African diversity and non-African admixture.

Authors:  John E Pool; Russell B Corbett-Detig; Ryuichi P Sugino; Kristian A Stevens; Charis M Cardeno; Marc W Crepeau; Pablo Duchen; J J Emerson; Perot Saelao; David J Begun; Charles H Langley
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Selective Sweeps.

Authors:  Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The Effects on Neutral Variability of Recurrent Selective Sweeps and Background Selection.

Authors:  José Luis Campos; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Toward an Evolutionarily Appropriate Null Model: Jointly Inferring Demography and Purifying Selection.

Authors:  Parul Johri; Brian Charlesworth; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  How Good Are Predictions of the Effects of Selective Sweeps on Levels of Neutral Diversity?

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The importance of the Neutral Theory in 1968 and 50 years on: A response to Kern and Hahn 2018.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Jensen; Bret A Payseur; Wolfgang Stephan; Charles F Aquadro; Michael Lynch; Deborah Charlesworth; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Background selection under evolving recombination rates.

Authors:  Tom R Booker; Bret A Payseur; Anna Tigano
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 5.530

7.  The Impact of Purifying and Background Selection on the Inference of Population History: Problems and Prospects.

Authors:  Parul Johri; Kellen Riall; Hannes Becher; Laurent Excoffier; Brian Charlesworth; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Revisiting the notion of deleterious sweeps.

Authors:  Parul Johri; Brian Charlesworth; Emma K Howell; Michael Lynch; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 9.  Detecting positive selection in the genome.

Authors:  Tom R Booker; Benjamin C Jackson; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  A model species for agricultural pest genomics: the genome of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).

Authors:  Sean D Schoville; Yolanda H Chen; Martin N Andersson; Joshua B Benoit; Anita Bhandari; Julia H Bowsher; Kristian Brevik; Kaat Cappelle; Mei-Ju M Chen; Anna K Childers; Christopher Childers; Olivier Christiaens; Justin Clements; Elise M Didion; Elena N Elpidina; Patamarerk Engsontia; Markus Friedrich; Inmaculada García-Robles; Richard A Gibbs; Chandan Goswami; Alessandro Grapputo; Kristina Gruden; Marcin Grynberg; Bernard Henrissat; Emily C Jennings; Jeffery W Jones; Megha Kalsi; Sher A Khan; Abhishek Kumar; Fei Li; Vincent Lombard; Xingzhou Ma; Alexander Martynov; Nicholas J Miller; Robert F Mitchell; Monica Munoz-Torres; Anna Muszewska; Brenda Oppert; Subba Reddy Palli; Kristen A Panfilio; Yannick Pauchet; Lindsey C Perkin; Marko Petek; Monica F Poelchau; Éric Record; Joseph P Rinehart; Hugh M Robertson; Andrew J Rosendale; Victor M Ruiz-Arroyo; Guy Smagghe; Zsofia Szendrei; Gregg W C Thomas; Alex S Torson; Iris M Vargas Jentzsch; Matthew T Weirauch; Ashley D Yates; George D Yocum; June-Sun Yoon; Stephen Richards
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.