Literature DB >> 14660698

Effect of strong directional selection on weakly selected mutations at linked sites: implication for synonymous codon usage.

Yuseob Kim1.   

Abstract

The fixation of weakly selected mutations can be greatly influenced by strong directional selection at linked loci. Here, I investigate a two-locus model in which weakly selected, reversible mutations occur at one locus and recurrent strong directional selection occurs at the other locus. This model is analogous to selection on codon usage at synonymous sites linked to nonsynonymous sites under strong directional selection. Two approximations obtained here describe the expected frequency of the weakly selected preferred alleles at equilibrium. These approximations, as well as simulation results, show that the level of codon bias declines with an increasing rate of substitution at the strongly selected locus, as expected from the well-understood theory that selection at one locus reduces the efficacy of selection at linked loci. These solutions are used to examine whether the negative correlation between codon bias and nonsynonymous substitution rates recently observed in Drosophila can be explained by this hitchhiking effect. It is shown that this observation can be reasonably well accounted for if a large fraction of the nonsynonymous substitutions on genes in the data set are driven by strong directional selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14660698     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  24 in total

1.  Rapid Evolution of Ovarian-Biased Genes in the Yellow Fever Mosquito (Aedes aegypti).

Authors:  Carrie A Whittle; Cassandra G Extavour
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Estimating selection on nonsynonymous mutations.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; Brian Charlesworth; Carolina Bartolomé; Véronique Nöel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  X-linked genes evolve higher codon bias in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Jerel C Davis; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Positive selection acting on splicing motifs reflects compensatory evolution.

Authors:  Shengdong Ke; Xiang H-F Zhang; Lawrence A Chasin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  Fundamental concepts in genetics: effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Correlated evolution of synonymous and nonsynonymous sites in Drosophila.

Authors:  Gabriel Marais; Tomislav Domazet-Loso; Diethard Tautz; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Recent and Long-Term Selection Across Synonymous Sites in Drosophila ananassae.

Authors:  Jae Young Choi; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Codon bias and noncoding GC content correlate negatively with recombination rate on the Drosophila X chromosome.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Jerel C Davis; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Background selection in single genes may explain patterns of codon bias.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.