Literature DB >> 33106248

How Good Are Predictions of the Effects of Selective Sweeps on Levels of Neutral Diversity?

Brian Charlesworth1.   

Abstract

Selective sweeps are thought to play a significant role in shaping patterns of variability across genomes; accurate predictions of their effects are, therefore, important for understanding these patterns. A commonly used model of selective sweeps assumes that alleles sampled at the end of a sweep, and that fail to recombine with wild-type haplotypes during the sweep, coalesce instantaneously, leading to a simple expression for sweep effects on diversity. It is shown here that there can be a significant probability that a pair of alleles sampled at the end of a sweep coalesce during the sweep before a recombination event can occur, reducing their expected coalescent time below that given by the simple approximation. Expressions are derived for the expected reductions in pairwise neutral diversities caused by both single and recurrent sweeps in the presence of such within-sweep coalescence, although the effects of multiple recombination events during a sweep are only treated heuristically. The accuracies of the resulting expressions were checked against the results of simulations. For even moderate ratios of the recombination rate to the selection coefficient, the simple approximation can be substantially inaccurate. The selection model used here can be applied to favorable mutations with arbitrary dominance coefficients, to sex-linked loci with sex-specific selection coefficients, and to inbreeding populations. Using the results from this model, the expected differences between the levels of variability on X chromosomes and autosomes with selection at linked sites are discussed, and compared with data on a population of Drosophila melanogaster.
Copyright © 2020 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; background selection; favorable mutations; neutral variability; selective sweeps

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33106248      PMCID: PMC7768247          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.120.303734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  77 in total

1.  Drosophila melanogaster recombination rate calculator.

Authors:  Anna-Sophie Fiston-Lavier; Nadia D Singh; Mikhail Lipatov; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  Approximating selective sweeps.

Authors:  Richard Durrett; Jason Schweinsberg
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  The ratio of human X chromosome to autosome diversity is positively correlated with genetic distance from genes.

Authors:  Michael F Hammer; August E Woerner; Fernando L Mendez; Joseph C Watkins; Murray P Cox; Jeffrey D Wall
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  A Coalescent Model for a Sweep of a Unique Standing Variant.

Authors:  Jeremy J Berg; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Directional positive selection on an allele of arbitrary dominance.

Authors:  Kosuke M Teshima; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The "hitchhiking effect" revisited.

Authors:  N L Kaplan; R R Hudson; C H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  From Drift to Draft: How Much Do Beneficial Mutations Actually Contribute to Predictions of Ohta's Slightly Deleterious Model of Molecular Evolution?

Authors:  Jun Chen; Sylvain Glémin; Martin Lascoux
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Background selection as baseline for nucleotide variation across the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Josep M Comeron
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Adaptive Evolution Is Substantially Impeded by Hill-Robertson Interference in Drosophila.

Authors:  David Castellano; Marta Coronado-Zamora; Jose L Campos; Antonio Barbadilla; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges from Drosophila studies.

Authors:  Josep M Comeron
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  4 in total

1.  Strong neutral sweeps occurring during a population contraction.

Authors:  Antoine Moinet; Flávia Schlichta; Stephan Peischl; Laurent Excoffier
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Studying models of balancing selection using phase-type theory.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth; Asger Hobolth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Sweeps in time: leveraging the joint distribution of branch lengths.

Authors:  Gertjan Bisschop; Konrad Lohse; Derek Setter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Meiotic, genomic and evolutionary properties of crossover distribution in Drosophila yakuba.

Authors:  Nikale Pettie; Ana Llopart; Josep M Comeron
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.917

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.