Literature DB >> 24123300

Magnetic resonance elastography of liver in healthy Asians: normal liver stiffness quantification and reproducibility assessment.

Sudhakar K Venkatesh1, Gang Wang, Lynette L S Teo, Bertrand W L Ang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine normal liver stiffness values evaluated with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in healthy normal Asian volunteers and assess its reproducibility.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Liver stiffness was evaluated with MRE in 41 healthy Asians (23 females, 18 males; mean age, 41.8 years, and mean body mass index [BMI], 23.4 kg/m(2) ) on a 1.5T clinical scanner. The correlations between mean liver stiffness and age, gender, BMI, and fat fraction percentage of the liver were studied. Another 12 volunteers underwent liver MRE exams on two separate days 4-6 weeks apart under similar conditions for reproducibility assessment. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis was performed and within-subject coefficient of variation (CV) of stiffness was estimated.
RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of liver stiffness in normal healthy Asian subjects was 2.09 ± 0.22 kPa (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.04-2.15 kPa; range 1.68-2.48 kPa). The mean liver stiffness did not significantly correlate with age, gender, BMI, or fat content of the liver. The ICC for mean liver stiffness was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.78-0.96) and CV ranged from 2.2%-11.4%.
CONCLUSION: The liver stiffness in normal Asians is not affected by age, gender, BMI, or fat content. Liver stiffness with MRE is highly reproducible.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  age; gender; liver stiffness measurement; magnetic resonance elastography; normal healthy subjects; reproducibility

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24123300     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  33 in total

Review 1.  General review of magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Gavin Low; Scott A Kruse; David J Lomas
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-28

2.  Repeatability and reproducibility of 2D and 3D hepatic MR elastography with rigid and flexible drivers at end-expiration and end-inspiration in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Kang Wang; Paul Manning; Nikolaus Szeverenyi; Tanya Wolfson; Gavin Hamilton; Michael S Middleton; Florin Vaida; Meng Yin; Kevin Glaser; Richard L Ehman; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-12

3.  Ultrasound Elastography and MR Elastography for Assessing Liver Fibrosis: Part 2, Diagnostic Performance, Confounders, and Future Directions.

Authors:  An Tang; Guy Cloutier; Nikolaus M Szeverenyi; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Clinical Utility of an Increase in Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Predicting Fibrosis Progression in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Authors:  Veeral H Ajmera; Amy Liu; Seema Singh; Georg Yachoa; Matthew Ramey; Meera Bhargava; Ava Zamani; Scarlett Lopez; Neeraj Mangla; Ricki Bettencourt; Emily Rizo; Mark Valasek; Cynthia Behling; Lisa Richards; Claude Sirlin; Rohit Loomba
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Repeatability of MR Elastography of Liver: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Suraj D Serai; Nancy A Obuchowski; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Claude B Sirlin; Frank H Miller; Edward Ashton; Patricia E Cole; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance elastography: basic principles, technique, and clinical applications in the liver.

Authors:  Habip Eser Akkaya; Ayşe Erden; Diğdem Kuru Öz; Sena Ünal; İlhan Erden
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 7.  Evaluation of hepatic fibrosis: a review from the society of abdominal radiology disease focus panel.

Authors:  Jeanne M Horowitz; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman; Kartik Jhaveri; Patrick Kamath; Michael A Ohliger; Anthony E Samir; Alvin C Silva; Bachir Taouli; Michael S Torbenson; Michael L Wells; Benjamin Yeh; Frank H Miller
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-08

8.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracies of two- and three-dimensional MR elastography of the liver.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Morisaka; Utaroh Motosugi; Kevin J Glaser; Shintaro Ichikawa; Richard L Ehman; Katsuhiro Sano; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Hiroshi Onishi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance elastography of abdomen.

Authors:  Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-04

Review 10.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver: Current Update.

Authors:  Safa Hoodeshenas; Meng Yin; Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.