Literature DB >> 28451858

Biomechanical in vitro comparison of radiofrequency kyphoplasty and balloon kyphoplasty.

Gerhard Achatz1, Hans-Joachim Riesner2, Benedikt Friemert2, Raimund Lechner2, Nicolas Graf3, Hans-Joachim Wilke4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Balloon kyphoplasty (BK) has emerged as a popular method for treating osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). In response to several shortcomings of BK, alternative methods have been introduced, among which is radiofrequency kyphoplasty (RFK). Biomechanical comparisons of BK and RFK are very sparse. The purpose of this study was to perform a biomechanical study in which BK and RFK are compared.
METHODS: Each of the two study groups comprised six specimens prepared from two functional spinal units (FSUs) cut from fresh-frozen cadaveric spines (3 of T9-T11 and 3 of T12-L2). VCFs (A1.2 type) were created in the middle VB of each of the FSUs, with a height loss of 30% of the VB. After that, the specimens were subjected to cyclic compression-compression loading. The following parameters were determined: range of motion (ROM), height of the middle VB, augmentation time, cement interdigitation and cement distribution. Also, the cement layer, the trabecular bone in the augmented VB and the bone-cement interface were examined for cracks. All of these parameters were determined at various stages, namely in the intact middle VB and after its fracture, cement augmentation and subject to the cyclic loading protocol.
RESULTS: Fractures caused a significant increase in median ROM and a significant reduction in the height of fractured VB. Cement augmentation significantly stabilized the fractures and led to partial height restoration. ROM and vertebral height, however, were not restored to the intact levels. Cyclic loading led to a further significant increase in ROM and a significant height reduction. There were no significant differences between BK and RFK in terms of any of these parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: BK and RFK achieved similar results for fracture stabilization and restoration of the height of the fractured VB. RFK involved shorter cement augmentation time and less damage to the trabecular bone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Balloon kyphoplasty; Biomechanical testing; Radiofrequency kyphoplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28451858     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5035-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  29 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.

Authors:  Andrew Perry; Andrew Mahar; Jennifer Massie; Noemi Arrieta; Steven Garfin; Choll Kim
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants.

Authors:  H J Wilke; K Wenger; L Claes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used in the treatment of compression fracture.

Authors:  S M Belkoff; J M Mathis; D C Fenton; R M Scribner; M E Reiley; K Talmadge
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Vertebroplasty with high-viscosity polymethylmethacrylate cement facilitates vertebral body restoration in vitro.

Authors:  Matthias Rüger; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Effect of augmentation on the mechanics of vertebral wedge fractures.

Authors:  D R Wilson; E R Myers; J M Mathis; R M Scribner; J A Conta; M A Reiley; K D Talmadge; W C Hayes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Biomechanical performance of the new BeadEx implant in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: restoration and maintenance of height and stability.

Authors:  A Kettler; W Schmoelz; Y Shezifi; N Ohana; A Ben-Arye; L Claes; H-J Wilke
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  A universal spine tester for in vitro experiments with muscle force simulation.

Authors:  H J Wilke; L Claes; H Schmitt; S Wolf
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Biomechanical comparison of unipedicular versus bipedicular kyphoplasty.

Authors:  John Steinmann; Craig T Tingey; Gina Cruz; Qian Dai
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a prospective non-randomized study.

Authors:  Ulrich Berlemann; Torsten Franz; Rene Orler; Paul F Heini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a prospective, comparative, and randomized clinical study.

Authors:  J T Liu; W J Liao; W C Tan; J K Lee; C H Liu; Y H Chen; T B Lin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  4 in total

1.  Biomechanical effects of different vertebral heights after augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Wen-Tao Zhao; Da-Ping Qin; Xiao-Gang Zhang; Zhi-Peng Wang; Zun Tong
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.359

2.  Polymethylmethacrylate distribution is associated with recompression after vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Yu Hou; Qi Yao; Genai Zhang; Lixiang Ding; Hui Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Advances in Vertebral Augmentation Systems for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Authors:  Yufeng Long; Weihong Yi; Dazhi Yang
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.037

4.  Finite element analysis of wedge and biconcave deformity in four different height restoration after augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Zuo; Yin-Bing Chen; Peng Xie; Wen-Dong Zhang; Xiang-Yun Xue; Qian-Xi Zhang; Ben Shan; Xiao-Bing Zhang; Hong-Guang Bao; Yan-Na Si
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.