Literature DB >> 11154534

An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used in the treatment of compression fracture.

S M Belkoff1, J M Mathis, D C Fenton, R M Scribner, M E Reiley, K Talmadge.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Ex vivo biomechanical study using osteoporotic cadaveric vertebral bodies.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if the inflatable bone tamp (tamp) restores height to compressed vertebral bodies and to compare the biomechanical properties of isolated, fractured osteoporotic vertebral bodies treated by kyphoplasty (tamp) or vertebroplasty. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous biomechanical studies have shown that vertebroplasty increases vertebral body strength and restores vertebral body stiffness, but does not restore vertebral body height lost as a result of compression fracture.
METHODS: Compression fractures were experimentally created in 16 osteoporotic VBs assigned to either the tamp or percutaneous vertebroplasty group. The tamp treatment consisted of inserting balloon-like devices into the vertebral body, inflating the bone tamp, and filling the void with Simplex P (Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ) bone cement. The percutaneous vertebroplasty treatment consisted of directly injecting Cranioplastic bone cement (CMW, Blackpool, UK) into the vertebral body. Pre- and posttreatment heights were measured, and the repaired vertebral bodies were recompressed to determine posttreatment strength and stiffness values.
RESULTS: The tamp treatment resulted in significant restoration (97%) of vertebral body height lost after compression, whereas percutaneous vertebroplasty treatment resulted in a significantly lower restoration of lost height (30%) (P < 0.05). Both treatments resulted in significantly stronger vertebral bodies relative to their initial state (P < 0.05). The tamp treatment restored vertebral body stiffness to initial values, but the percutaneous vertebroplasty treatment did not (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Tamp treatment resulted in significantly greater height restoration than did percutaneous vertebroplasty, without loss of vertebral body strength or stiffness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11154534     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200101150-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  58 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: a developing standard of care for vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  J M Mathis; J D Barr; S M Belkoff; M S Barr; M E Jensen; H Deramond
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of hydroxyapatite and polymethylmethacrylate cements for use with vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen M Belkoff; John M Mathis; Louis E Jasper
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty: a comparison and contrast.

Authors:  John M Mathis; A Orlando Ortiz; Gregg H Zoarski
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  A novel sheep vertebral bone defect model for injectable bioactive vertebral augmentation materials.

Authors:  X S Zhu; Z M Zhang; H Q Mao; D C Geng; J Zou; G L Wang; Z G Zhang; J H Wang; L Chen; H L Yang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Accuracy of DXA scanning of the thoracic spine: cadaveric studies comparing BMC, areal BMD and geometric estimates of volumetric BMD against ash weight and CT measures of bone volume.

Authors:  Meena M Sran; Karim M Khan; Kathy Keiver; Jason B Chew; Heather A McKay; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: rapid pain relief for vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Robert G Dixon; John M Mathis
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Analysis of anatomic morphometry of the pedicles and the safe zone for through-pedicle procedures in the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Shiu-Bii Lien; Nien-Hsien Liou; Shing-Sheng Wu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carmen Bouza; Teresa López; Angeles Magro; Lourdes Navalpotro; José María Amate
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  [Balloon assisted cement application for stable fixation of pedicle screws in osteoporosis].

Authors:  D Briem; J P Petersen; P G Begemann; J M Rueger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Vertebral compression fracture with intravertebral vacuum cleft sign: pathogenesis, image, and surgical intervention.

Authors:  Ai-Min Wu; Yong-Long Chi; Wen-Fei Ni
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2013-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.