Literature DB >> 9629939

Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants.

H J Wilke1, K Wenger, L Claes.   

Abstract

New implants and new surgical approaches should be tested in vitro for primary stability in standardized laboratory tests in order to decide the most appropriate approach before being accepted for clinical use. Due to the complex and still unknown loading of the spine in vivo a variety of different test loading conditions have been used, making comparison of the results from different groups almost impossible. This recommendation was developed in a series of workshops with research scientists, orthopedic and trauma surgeons, and research and development executives from spinal implant companies. The purpose was to agree on in vitro testing conditions that would allow results from various research groups to be compared. This paper describes the recommended loading methods, specimen conditions, and analysis parameters resulting from these workshops.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9629939      PMCID: PMC3611233          DOI: 10.1007/s005860050045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  172 in total

1.  Thoracolumbar fracture stabilization: comparative biomechanical evaluation of a new video-assisted implantable system.

Authors:  M Schultheiss; E Hartwig; L Kinzl; L Claes; H-J Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical analysis of anterior cervical spine plate fixation systems with unicortical and bicortical screw purchase.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lehmann; Michael Blauth; Daniel Briem; Ulf Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Vertebral body replacement in spine surgery].

Authors:  F Kandziora; K J Schnake; C K Klostermann; N P Haas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine locked and unlocked plate-fixation systems.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lehmann; Daniel Briem; Michael Blauth; Ulf Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effect of constrained posterior screw and rod systems for primary stability: biomechanical in vitro comparison of various instrumentations in a single-level corpectomy model.

Authors:  René Schmidt; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Lutz Claes; Wolfhart Puhl; Marcus Richter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  [Expandable cages: biomechanical comparison of different cages for ventral spondylodesis in the thoracolumbar spine].

Authors:  C Khodadadyan-Klostermann; J Schaefer; Ph Schleicher; R Pflugmacher; T Eindorf; N P Haas; F Kandziora
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Influence of screw-cement enhancement on the stability of anterior thoracolumbar fracture stabilization with circumferential instability.

Authors:  Markus Schultheiss; Erich Hartwig; Lutz Claes; Lothar Kinzl; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The primary stability of angle-stable versus conventional locked intramedullary nails.

Authors:  Dirk Wähnert; Yves Stolarczyk; Konrad L Hoffmeier; Michael J Raschke; Gunther O Hofmann; Thomas Mückley
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Biomechanical evaluation of a posterior non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Werner Schmoelz; Stefanie Erhart; Stefan Unger; Alexander C Disch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part I. Biomechanical effects on lumbar spinal motion.

Authors:  Patrick Strube; Stephan Tohtz; Eike Hoff; Christian Gross; Carsten Perka; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.