| Literature DB >> 28446150 |
Mitzi Flores-Ponce1, Miguel Vallebueno-Estrada1, Eduardo González-Orozco1, Hilda E Ramos-Aboites1, J Noé García-Chávez1, Nelson Simões2, Rafael Montiel3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae has been used worldwide as a biocontrol agent for insect pests, making it an interesting model for understanding parasite-host interactions. Two models propose that these interactions are co-evolutionary processes in such a way that equilibrium is never reached. In one model, known as "arms race", new alleles in relevant genes are fixed in both host and pathogens by directional positive selection, producing recurrent and alternating selective sweeps. In the other model, known as"trench warfare", persistent dynamic fluctuations in allele frequencies are sustained by balancing selection. There are some examples of genes evolving according to both models, however, it is not clear to what extent these interactions might alter genome-level evolutionary patterns and intraspecific diversity. Here we investigate some of these aspects by studying genomic variation in S. carpocapsae and other pathogenic and free-living nematodes from phylogenetic clades IV and V.Entities:
Keywords: Arms race; Balancing selection; Genomic scans; Positive selection; Red Queen; Tajima’s D; Trench warfare; dN/dS
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28446150 PMCID: PMC5405473 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-017-0935-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1Phylogenetic reconstructions for each clade obtained from concatenated sequences for each dataset. a phylogenetic reconstruction from the 1552 orthologues in clade IV; b phylogenetic reconstruction from 1510 orthologues in clade V. Branches used for Likelihood Ratio Tests (LRTs) are marked according to the species lifestyles; ■, entomopathogenic; ●, vertebrate parasite; ♦ parasite branch; ▲, free-living. All tests were based on an unrooted phylogeny; the trees are rooted for display purposes only. Values correspond to branch lengths, and bootstrap values are shown under the branch leading to the animal parasites
Interspecific analyses of positive selection
| Dataset name | C4N4 Clade IV | C5N4 Clade V | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orthologues analysed (Global analysis) | 1552 | 1510 | ||||||
| Genes with ω significantly different among branches (LRT, | 124 | 113 | ||||||
| Foreground branch (ω1) | Sc | Sr | (ScSr) | Pr | Hb | Hc | (HbHc) | Cb |
| Branch model | ||||||||
| Genes with ω1 > 1 and significantly different than ω0 (LRT, | 9 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 17 | 11 | 7 | 17 |
| Genes with ω1 significantly greater than 1 (LRT, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Branch-site model | ||||||||
| Genes with sites under positive selection (ω > 1) (LRT, | 74 | 24 | 21 | 91 | 61 | 55 | 20 | 87 |
| Average proportion of sites under positive selection per gene (standard deviation) | 4.94% | 6.31% | 3.58% | 5.16% | 9.88% | 5.81% | 8.74% | 7.90% |
| (0.053) | (0.117) | (0.045) | (0.054) | (0.140) | (0.068) | (0.155) | (0.092) | |
Percentages are from the total of genes tested for each set, unless stated
aPercentage of genes in relation to the total genes estimated for S. carpocapsae [12] in clade IV and C. briggsae [19] in clade V. Sc, Steinernema carpocapsae; Sr, Strongyloides ratti; Pr, Panagrellus redivivus; Hb, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora; Hc, Haemonchus contortus; Cb, Caenorhabditis briggsae
Fig. 2Over-represented unique GO terms in genes with sites under positive selection. a clade IV, b clade V. Biological process in green, molecular function in blue, and cellular component in yellow. Enrichment analyses were performed with Blast2GO with a Fisher’s exact test [65]
Intraspecific analyses of selection
| Species |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Number of windows | 84,767 | 108,421 |
| Windows with coverage > 90% | 69,694 | 65,933 |
| Invariable windows | 400 | 21 |
| Windows with Tajima’s D values | 69,294 | 65,912 |
| Genes covered (>50%) in windows with D values (Global number of genes analysed) | 14,994 | 15,473 |
| Tajima’s D range of values | −2.105 — 2.592 | −2.057 — 2.452 |
| Tajima’s D average | 1.097 | 0.355 |
| Confidence limits according to theoretical distribution [ | −1.733 — 1.975 | −1.733 — 1.975 |
| Theoretical significant windows | 6522 | 80 |
| Confidence limits obtained from the observed distribution | −0.468 — 2.264 | −0.355 — 1.369 |
| Significant windows according to the observed distributiona | 2,759 | 2,624 |
| Genes in windows with significant D valuesa | 530 (3.53%) | 487 (3.15%) |
| - Significant positive | 228 (1.52%) | 247 (1.6%) |
| - Significant negative | 302 (2.01%) | 240 (1.55%) |
| π values range | 0.00035 — 0.075 | 0.00035 — 0.045 |
| Average π value | 0.006700 | 0.007763 |
| ϴ values range | 0.35349 – 61.5065 | 0.3535 – 49.1345 |
| Average ϴ value | 5.369212 | 7.166656 |
a Windows falling in the upper (positive) and lower (negative) 2% of the observed distribution
Fig. 3Distribution of Tajima’s D values estimated in sliding windows of 1,000 bp across the genomes. a Steinernema carpocapsae; b Caenorhabditis briggsae. D values were non-continuous (i.e., were distributed in discrete intervals). Red lines correspond to the maximum and minimum confidence limits according to [30]. Blue lines correspond to the maximum and minimum corrected confidence limits from the observed distribution (upper and lower 2%)
Patterns of selection in the genome of Steinernema carpocapsae and in identified expressed proteins
| Interspecific analysis |
| Positive selectiona | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Differentially expressed | 143 | 11 (7.69%) | ||
| Non-differentially expressed | 447 | 30 (6.71%) | ||
| Intraspecific analysis | N | Significant Db | Significant positive Dc | Significant negative Dc |
| Differentially expressed | 1009 | 42 (4.16%) | 23 (2.28%) | 19 (1.88%) |
| Non-differentially expressed | 2084 | 79 (3.80%) | 29 (1.40%) | 50 (2.40%) |
N number of genes analysed
aBranch-sites test, LRT, p < 0.05
bTajima’s D, 96% confidence level obtained from the real distribution
cTajima’s D, 98% confidence level obtained from the real distribution
Likelihood Ratio Tests (LRTs) performed for each selected branch
| Codon substitution model | LRT | Models | Parameters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Branch | H0: Same ω for all branches | Model 0: one-ratio model vs Model 1: free-ratios model. | Model 0: model = 0, fix_omega = 0, omega = 0 |
| Branch | H0: Same ω for all branches | Model 0: one-ratio model vs Model 2: different ratio in the specified branch | Model 0: model = 0, fix_omega = 0, omega = 0 |
| Branch | H0: ω = 1 for the foreground branch | Model 2: different ratio in specified branch vs Model 2 fix ω: ratio = 1 in the specified branch | Model 2: model = 2, fix_omega = 0, omega = 0 |
| Branch-Site | H0: Same ω for all sites among branches. | A: different ratio per site in specified branch vs A1: | A: model = 2, NSsites = 2, fix_omega = 0 |
NSsites = 0 for all the branch models. kappa was estimated for each gene and fixed with fix_kappa = 1 and kappa = estimated value. For all the models these parameters were the same: noisy = 3, verbose = 0,runmode = 0, seqtype = 1, CodonFreq = 2, clock = 0, aaDist = 0, icode = 0, fix_alpha = 1, alpha = 0, Malpha = 0, ncatG = 10, getSE = 0, RateAncestor = 0, Small_Diff = .5e-6, cleandata = 1, method = 1
Steinernema carpocapsae and Caenorhabditis briggsae strains used for intraspecific analysis
| Species | Strain | Geographic origin | Sequencing platform | Source | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Bretona | France | 454flx, SOLiD | NS | [ |
|
| All/USA strain | USA | HiSeq 2500 | HGB | This study |
|
| Az20 | Açores, Portugal | HiSeq 2500 | NS | This study |
|
| Az154 | Açores, Portugal | HiSeq 2500 | NS | This study |
|
| Az157 | Açores, Portugal | HiSeq 2500 | NS | This study |
|
| AF16a | Guajarat, India | Combined | Wormbase | [ |
|
| JU1348 | Kerala, India | HiSeq 2000 | NCBI | [ |
|
| QR25 | Quebec, Canada | GA IIx | NCBI | [ |
|
| VX0034 | Hubei, China | HiSeq 2000 | NCBI | [ |
|
| ED3101 | Nairobi, Kenya | GA IIx | NCBI | [ |
Strains are natural isolates. Sequencing platform are: Combined, whole-genome shotgun sequencing (WGS) with a high-resolution, sequence-ready physical map; GA, Genome Analyzer. Libraries were Paired End (100bpx2). Strains sources are: NS, Nelson Simões; HGB, Heidi Goodrich-Blair. NCBI, National Centre for Biotechnology Information
aReference genome; S. carpocapsae from [12], and C. briggsae from wormbase.org (c_briggsae. PRJNA10731.WS253) [19]