Literature DB >> 14624247

The genome sequence of Caenorhabditis briggsae: a platform for comparative genomics.

Lincoln D Stein1, Zhirong Bao, Darin Blasiar, Thomas Blumenthal, Michael R Brent, Nansheng Chen, Asif Chinwalla, Laura Clarke, Chris Clee, Avril Coghlan, Alan Coulson, Peter D'Eustachio, David H A Fitch, Lucinda A Fulton, Robert E Fulton, Sam Griffiths-Jones, Todd W Harris, LaDeana W Hillier, Ravi Kamath, Patricia E Kuwabara, Elaine R Mardis, Marco A Marra, Tracie L Miner, Patrick Minx, James C Mullikin, Robert W Plumb, Jane Rogers, Jacqueline E Schein, Marc Sohrmann, John Spieth, Jason E Stajich, C Wei, David Willey, Richard K Wilson, Richard Durbin, Robert H Waterston.   

Abstract

The soil nematodes Caenorhabditis briggsae and Caenorhabditis elegans diverged from a common ancestor roughly 100 million years ago and yet are almost indistinguishable by eye. They have the same chromosome number and genome sizes, and they occupy the same ecological niche. To explore the basis for this striking conservation of structure and function, we have sequenced the C. briggsae genome to a high-quality draft stage and compared it to the finished C. elegans sequence. We predict approximately 19,500 protein-coding genes in the C. briggsae genome, roughly the same as in C. elegans. Of these, 12,200 have clear C. elegans orthologs, a further 6,500 have one or more clearly detectable C. elegans homologs, and approximately 800 C. briggsae genes have no detectable matches in C. elegans. Almost all of the noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) known are shared between the two species. The two genomes exhibit extensive colinearity, and the rate of divergence appears to be higher in the chromosomal arms than in the centers. Operons, a distinctive feature of C. elegans, are highly conserved in C. briggsae, with the arrangement of genes being preserved in 96% of cases. The difference in size between the C. briggsae (estimated at approximately 104 Mbp) and C. elegans (100.3 Mbp) genomes is almost entirely due to repetitive sequence, which accounts for 22.4% of the C. briggsae genome in contrast to 16.5% of the C. elegans genome. Few, if any, repeat families are shared, suggesting that most were acquired after the two species diverged or are undergoing rapid evolution. Coclustering the C. elegans and C. briggsae proteins reveals 2,169 protein families of two or more members. Most of these are shared between the two species, but some appear to be expanding or contracting, and there seem to be as many as several hundred novel C. briggsae gene families. The C. briggsae draft sequence will greatly improve the annotation of the C. elegans genome. Based on similarity to C. briggsae, we found strong evidence for 1,300 new C. elegans genes. In addition, comparisons of the two genomes will help to understand the evolutionary forces that mold nematode genomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14624247      PMCID: PMC261899          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Biol        ISSN: 1544-9173            Impact factor:   8.029


  110 in total

1.  Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites.

Authors:  Z Yang; R Nielsen; N Goldman; A M Pedersen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  It takes two transposons to tango: transposable-element-mediated chromosomal rearrangements.

Authors:  Y H Gray
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Age distribution of human gene families shows significant roles of both large- and small-scale duplications in vertebrate evolution.

Authors:  Xun Gu; Yufeng Wang; Jianying Gu
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment.

Authors:  C Notredame; D G Higgins; J Heringa
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-09-08       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Improving gene recognition accuracy by combining predictions from two gene-finding programs.

Authors:  Sanja Rogic; B F Francis Ouellette; Alan K Mackworth
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  J M Ranz; F Casals; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  The rDNA of C. elegans: sequence and structure.

Authors:  R E Ellis; J E Sulston; A R Coulson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1986-03-11       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Coordination of ges-1 expression between the Caenorhabditis pharynx and intestine.

Authors:  S D Marshall; J D McGhee
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  Genome evolution and developmental constraint in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Cristian I Castillo-Davis; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Large-scale comparison of intron positions in mammalian genes shows intron loss but no gain.

Authors:  Scott W Roy; Alexei Fedorov; Walter Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  411 in total

1.  Bioinformatic analysis of P granule-related proteins: insights into germ granule evolution in nematodes.

Authors:  Luis A Bezares-Calderón; Arturo Becerra; Laura S Salinas; Ernesto Maldonado; Rosa E Navarro
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  Genome annotation by high-throughput 5' RNA end determination.

Authors:  Byung Joon Hwang; Hans-Michael Müller; Paul W Sternberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The functional genomic distribution of protein divergence in two animal phyla: coevolution, genomic conflict, and constraint.

Authors:  Cristian I Castillo-Davis; Fyodor A Kondrashov; Daniel L Hartl; Rob J Kulathinal
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Worm genomes hold the smoking guns of intron gain.

Authors:  John M Logsdon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Conference report--genomics: the promise of SNPs and bats highlights of the ABRF 2004--integrating technologies in proteomics and genomics; February 28-March 2, 2004; Portland, Oregon.

Authors:  Sara M Mariani
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-04-19

6.  Bioinformatical assay of human gene morbidity.

Authors:  Fyodor A Kondrashov; Aleksey Y Ogurtsov; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Evidence for a diverse Cys-loop ligand-gated ion channel superfamily in early bilateria.

Authors:  Joseph A Dent
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  WormBase: a multi-species resource for nematode biology and genomics.

Authors:  Todd W Harris; Nansheng Chen; Fiona Cunningham; Marcela Tello-Ruiz; Igor Antoshechkin; Carol Bastiani; Tamberlyn Bieri; Darin Blasiar; Keith Bradnam; Juancarlos Chan; Chao-Kung Chen; Wen J Chen; Paul Davis; Eimear Kenny; Ranjana Kishore; Daniel Lawson; Raymond Lee; Hans-Michael Muller; Cecilia Nakamura; Philip Ozersky; Andrei Petcherski; Anthony Rogers; Aniko Sabo; Erich M Schwarz; Kimberly Van Auken; Qinghua Wang; Richard Durbin; John Spieth; Paul W Sternberg; Lincoln D Stein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  C. elegans ORFeome version 3.1: increasing the coverage of ORFeome resources with improved gene predictions.

Authors:  Philippe Lamesch; Stuart Milstein; Tong Hao; Jennifer Rosenberg; Ning Li; Reynaldo Sequerra; Stephanie Bosak; Lynn Doucette-Stamm; Jean Vandenhaute; David E Hill; Marc Vidal
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Evolution of dnmt-2 and mbd-2-like genes in the free-living nematodes Pristionchus pacificus, Caenorhabditis elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae.

Authors:  Arturo Gutierrez; Ralf J Sommer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.