Literature DB >> 28436038

Direct current stimulation boosts synaptic gain and cooperativity in vitro.

Asif Rahman1, Belen Lafon1, Lucas C Parra1, Marom Bikson1.   

Abstract

KEY POINTS: Direct current stimulation (DCS) polarity specifically modulates synaptic efficacy during a continuous train of presynaptic inputs, despite synaptic depression. DCS polarizes afferent axons and postsynaptic neurons, boosting cooperativity between synaptic inputs. Polarization of afferent neurons in upstream brain regions may modulate activity in the target brain region during transcranial DCS (tDCS). A statistical theory of coincident activity predicts that the diffuse and weak profile of current flow can be advantageous in enhancing connectivity between co-active brain regions. ABSTRACT: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) produces sustained and diffuse current flow in the brain with effects that are state dependent and outlast stimulation. A mechanistic explanation for tDCS should capture these spatiotemporal features. It remains unclear how sustained DCS affects ongoing synaptic dynamics and how modulation of afferent inputs by diffuse stimulation changes synaptic activity at the target brain region. We tested the effect of acute DCS (10-20 V m-1 for 3-5 s) on synaptic dynamics with constant rate (5-40 Hz) and Poisson-distributed (4 Hz mean) trains of presynaptic inputs. Across tested frequencies, sustained synaptic activity was modulated by DCS with polarity-specific effects. Synaptic depression attenuates the sensitivity to DCS from 1.1% per V m-1 to 0.55%. DCS applied during synaptic activity facilitates cumulative neuromodulation, potentially reversing endogenous synaptic depression. We establish these effects are mediated by both postsynaptic membrane polarization and afferent axon fibre polarization, which boosts cooperativity between synaptic inputs. This potentially extends the locus of neuromodulation from the nominal target to afferent brain regions. Based on these results we hypothesized the polarization of afferent neurons in upstream brain regions may modulate activity in the target brain region during tDCS. A multiscale model of transcranial electrical stimulation including a finite element model of brain current flow, numerical simulations of neuronal activity, and a statistical theory of coincident activity predicts that the diffuse and weak profile of current flow can be advantageous. Thus, we propose that specifically because tDCS is diffuse, weak and sustained it can boost connectivity between co-active brain regions.
© 2017 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2017 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electrical brain stimulation; synaptic depression; transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28436038      PMCID: PMC5451737          DOI: 10.1113/JP273005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  40 in total

1.  Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates synaptic mechanisms involved in associative learning in behaving rabbits.

Authors:  Javier Márquez-Ruiz; Rocío Leal-Campanario; Raudel Sánchez-Campusano; Behnam Molaee-Ardekani; Fabrice Wendling; Pedro C Miranda; Giulio Ruffini; Agnès Gruart; José María Delgado-García
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Modulating functional connectivity patterns and topological functional organization of the human brain with transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Rafael Polanía; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Synaptic computation.

Authors:  L F Abbott; Wade G Regehr
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Presynaptic and postsynaptic effects of local cathodal DC polarization within the spinal cord in anaesthetized animal preparations.

Authors:  F Bolzoni; E Jankowska
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Short-term synaptic plasticity.

Authors:  Robert S Zucker; Wade G Regehr
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.318

6.  Influence of electric fields on the excitability of granule cells in guinea-pig hippocampal slices.

Authors:  J G Jefferys
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  On the mechanism of the post-activation depression of the H-reflex in human subjects.

Authors:  H Hultborn; M Illert; J Nielsen; A Paul; M Ballegaard; H Wiese
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Low-intensity electrical stimulation affects network dynamics by modulating population rate and spike timing.

Authors:  Davide Reato; Asif Rahman; Marom Bikson; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects.

Authors:  Asif Rahman; Davide Reato; Mattia Arlotti; Fernando Gasca; Abhishek Datta; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Subcortical effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in the rat.

Authors:  F Bolzoni; M Bączyk; E Jankowska
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes.

Authors:  Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Paola Marangolo; Benjamin M Hampstead; Sven Bestmann; Elisabeth Galletta; Helena Knotkova; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 2.  Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease.

Authors:  Devin Adair; Dennis Truong; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Nigel Gebodh; Helen Borges; Libby Ho; J Douglas Bremner; Bashar W Badran; Vitaly Napadow; Vincent P Clark; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Human Neocortical Neurosolver (HNN), a new software tool for interpreting the cellular and network origin of human MEG/EEG data.

Authors:  Samuel A Neymotin; Dylan S Daniels; Blake Caldwell; Robert A McDougal; Nicholas T Carnevale; Mainak Jas; Christopher I Moore; Michael L Hines; Matti Hämäläinen; Stephanie R Jones
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Effects of direct current stimulation on synaptic plasticity in a single neuron.

Authors:  Forouzan Farahani; Greg Kronberg; Mohamad FallahRad; Hysell V Oviedo; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Plasma BDNF Levels Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Allow Prediction of Synaptic Plasticity and Memory Deficits in 3×Tg-AD Mice.

Authors:  Sara Cocco; Marco Rinaudo; Salvatore Fusco; Valentina Longo; Katia Gironi; Pietro Renna; Giuseppe Aceto; Alessia Mastrodonato; Domenica Donatella Li Puma; Maria Vittoria Podda; Claudio Grassi
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-07-03

6.  Motor Learning Improvement Remains 3 Months After a Multisession Anodal tDCS Intervention in an Aging Population.

Authors:  Gaëlle Dumel; Marie-Eve Bourassa; Camille Charlebois-Plante; Martine Desjardins; Julien Doyon; Dave Saint-Amour; Louis De Beaumont
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 7.  Is there a neuroscience-based, mechanistic rationale for transcranial direct current stimulation as an adjunct treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder?

Authors:  C R Faucher; R A Doherty; N S Philip; A S M Harle; J J E Cole; M Van't Wout-Frank
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 8.  From adults to pediatrics: A review noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to facilitate recovery from brain injury.

Authors:  Georgia H O'Leary; Dorothea D Jenkins; Patricia Coker-Bolt; Mark S George; Steve Kautz; Marom Bikson; Bernadette T Gillick; Bashar W Badran
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.624

9.  Differential polarization of cortical pyramidal neuron dendrites through weak extracellular fields.

Authors:  Florian Aspart; Michiel W H Remme; Klaus Obermayer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Spinal cord stimulation for the restoration of bladder function after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Casey J Steadman; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2020-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.