Literature DB >> 34167660

From adults to pediatrics: A review noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to facilitate recovery from brain injury.

Georgia H O'Leary1, Dorothea D Jenkins2, Patricia Coker-Bolt3, Mark S George4, Steve Kautz5, Marom Bikson6, Bernadette T Gillick7, Bashar W Badran8.   

Abstract

Stroke is a major problem worldwide that impacts over 100 million adults and children annually. Rehabilitation therapy is the current standard of care to restore functional impairments post-stroke, however its effects are limited and many patients suffer persisting functional impairments and life-long disability. Noninvasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) has emerged as a potential rehabilitation treatment option in both adults and children with brain injury. In the last decade, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) have been investigated to improve motor recovery in adults post-stroke. These promising adult findings using NIBS, however, have yet to be widely translated to the area of pediatrics. The limited studies exploring NIBS in children have demonstrated safety, feasibility, and utility of stimulation-augmented rehabilitation. This chapter will describe the mechanism of NIBS therapy (cortical excitability, neuroplasticity) that underlies its use in stroke and motor function and how TMS, tDCS, and taVNS are applied in adult stroke treatment paradigms. We will then discuss the current state of NIBS in early pediatric brain injury and will provide insight regarding practical considerations and future applications of NIBS in pediatrics to make this promising treatment option a viable therapy in children.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain injury; Brain stimulation; Cerebral palsy; NIBS; Pediatrics; Stroke; TMS; VNS; tDCS; tVNS; taVNS

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34167660      PMCID: PMC8855635          DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2021.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.624


  151 in total

1.  Amygdala norepinephrine levels after training predict inhibitory avoidance retention performance in rats.

Authors:  Christa K McIntyre; Tammy Hatfield; James L McGaugh
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 2.  Stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Peter Langhorne; Julie Bernhardt; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke.

Authors:  M L Aisen; H I Krebs; N Hogan; F McDowell; B T Volpe
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1997-04

4.  Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Rehabilitation of Pediatric Motor Disorders Following Brain Injury: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Samar T Elbanna; Shorouk Elshennawy; M N Ayad
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and acoustic trauma or hearing loss in children.

Authors:  M A Collado-Corona; I Mora-Magaña; G L Cordero; R Toral-Martiñón; M Shkurovich-Zaslavsky; M Ruiz-Garcia; A González-Astiazarán
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.448

6.  NON-INVASIVE BRAIN STIMULATION IN CHILDREN: APPLICATIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS.

Authors:  Thilinie Rajapakse; Adam Kirton
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.757

7.  Laboratory Administration of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS): Technique, Targeting, and Considerations.

Authors:  Bashar W Badran; Alfred B Yu; Devin Adair; Georgia Mappin; William H DeVries; Dorothea D Jenkins; Mark S George; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Is Feasible for Remotely Supervised Home Delivery in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Margaret Kasschau; Jesse Reisner; Kathleen Sherman; Marom Bikson; Abhishek Datta; Leigh E Charvet
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2016-04-18

9.  tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow.

Authors:  Vishal Rawji; Matteo Ciocca; André Zacharia; David Soares; Dennis Truong; Marom Bikson; John Rothwell; Sven Bestmann
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 10.  Transcranial direct current stimulation for promoting motor function in cerebral palsy: a review.

Authors:  Melanie K Fleming; Tim Theologis; Rachel Buckingham; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Role of the Contra-Lesional Corticoreticular Tract in Motor Recovery of the Paretic Leg in Stroke: A Mini-Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sung Ho Jang; Min Jye Cho
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.473

2.  Safety and effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on hand function in preschool children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: A pilot study.

Authors:  Wenjie He; Yuan Huang; Lu He; Liru Liu; Peishan Zeng; Huiying Qiu; Xiaoyue Wang; Hongyu Zhou; Zhaofang Chen; Yi Xu; Jingyi Zhao; Wenda Wang; Hongmei Tang; Kaishou Xu
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 3.  Determining optimal mobile neurofeedback methods for motor neurorehabilitation in children and adults with non-progressive neurological disorders: a scoping review.

Authors:  Ahad Behboodi; Walker A Lee; Victoria S Hinchberger; Diane L Damiano
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 5.208

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.