Literature DB >> 28435103

Magnetization Transfer Contrast and Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI. Features and analysis of the field-dependent saturation spectrum.

Peter C M van Zijl1, Wilfred W Lam2, Jiadi Xu3, Linda Knutsson4, Greg J Stanisz5.   

Abstract

Magnetization Transfer Contrast (MTC) and Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) experiments measure the transfer of magnetization from molecular protons to the solvent water protons, an effect that becomes apparent as an MRI signal loss ("saturation"). This allows molecular information to be accessed with the enhanced sensitivity of MRI. In analogy to Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS), these saturation data are presented as a function of the chemical shift of participating proton groups, e.g. OH, NH, NH2, which is called a Z-spectrum. In tissue, these Z-spectra contain the convolution of multiple saturation transfer effects, including nuclear Overhauser enhancements (NOEs) and chemical exchange contributions from protons in semi-solid and mobile macromolecules or tissue metabolites. As a consequence, their appearance depends on the magnetic field strength (B0) and pulse sequence parameters such as B1 strength, pulse shape and length, and interpulse delay, which presents a major problem for quantification and reproducibility of MTC and CEST effects. The use of higher B0 can bring several advantages. In addition to higher detection sensitivity (signal-to-noise ratio, SNR), both MTC and CEST studies benefit from longer water T1 allowing the saturation transferred to water to be retained longer. While MTC studies are non-specific at any field strength, CEST specificity is expected to increase at higher field because of a larger chemical shift dispersion of the resonances of interest (similar to MRS). In addition, shifting to a slower exchange regime at higher B0 facilitates improved detection of the guanidinium protons of creatine and the inherently broad resonances of the amine protons in glutamate and the hydroxyl protons in myoinositol, glycogen, and glucosaminoglycans. Finally, due to the higher mobility of the contributing protons in CEST versus MTC, many new pulse sequences can be designed to more specifically edit for CEST signals and to remove MTC contributions.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CEST; MTC; Magnetization transfer; NOE; Nuclear Overhauser enhancement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28435103      PMCID: PMC5650949          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  128 in total

Review 1.  Chemical exchange saturation transfer contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A Dean Sherry; Mark Woods
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  Pulsed magnetization transfer contrast in gradient echo imaging: a two-pool analytic description of signal response.

Authors:  G B Pike
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Separation of intramolecular NOE and exchange peaks in water exchange spectroscopy using spin-echo filters.

Authors:  S Mori; J M Berg; P C van Zijl
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  CEST phase mapping using a length and offset varied saturation (LOVARS) scheme.

Authors:  Xiaolei Song; Assaf A Gilad; Suresh Joel; Guanshu Liu; Amnon Bar-Shir; Yajie Liang; Michael Gorelik; James J Pekar; Peter C M van Zijl; Jeff W M Bulte; Michael T McMahon
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Isolating chemical exchange saturation transfer contrast from magnetization transfer asymmetry under two-frequency rf irradiation.

Authors:  Jae-Seung Lee; Ravinder R Regatte; Alexej Jerschow
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo.

Authors:  S D Wolff; R S Balaban
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Imaging of glutamate in the spinal cord using GluCEST.

Authors:  Feliks Kogan; Anup Singh; Catherine Debrosse; Mohammad Haris; Kejia Cai; Ravi Prakash Nanga; Mark Elliott; Hari Hariharan; Ravinder Reddy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Natural D-glucose as a biodegradable MRI contrast agent for detecting cancer.

Authors:  Kannie W Y Chan; Michael T McMahon; Yoshinori Kato; Guanshu Liu; Jeff W M Bulte; Zaver M Bhujwalla; Dmitri Artemov; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Molecular, dynamic, and structural origin of inhomogeneous magnetization transfer in lipid membranes.

Authors:  Scott D Swanson; Dariya I Malyarenko; Mario L Fabiilli; Robert C Welsh; Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Ashok Srinivasan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Using frequency-labeled exchange transfer to separate out conventional magnetization transfer effects from exchange transfer effects when detecting ParaCEST agents.

Authors:  Chien-Yuan Lin; Nirbhay N Yadav; Joshua I Friedman; James Ratnakar; A Dean Sherry; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  74 in total

1.  Improving the detection sensitivity of pH-weighted amide proton transfer MRI in acute stroke patients using extrapolated semisolid magnetization transfer reference signals.

Authors:  Hye-Young Heo; Yi Zhang; Tina M Burton; Shanshan Jiang; Yansong Zhao; Peter C M van Zijl; Richard Leigh; Jinyuan Zhou
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Extradomain-B Fibronectin-Targeted Dextran-Based Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Magnetic Resonance Imaging Probe for Detecting Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Zheng Han; Shuixing Zhang; Kenji Fujiwara; Jia Zhang; Yuguo Li; Jing Liu; Peter C M van Zijl; Zheng-Rong Lu; Lei Zheng; Guanshu Liu
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 4.774

3.  Approximated analytical characterization of the steady-state chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) signals.

Authors:  Tao Jin; Seong-Gi Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Assessment of frequency drift on CEST MRI and dynamic correction: application to gagCEST at 7 T.

Authors:  Johannes Windschuh; Moritz Zaiss; Philipp Ehses; Jae-Seung Lee; Alexej Jerschow; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Separating fast and slow exchange transfer and magnetization transfer using off-resonance variable-delay multiple-pulse (VDMP) MRI.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Xiang Xu; Haifeng Zeng; Kannie W Y Chan; Nirbhay Yadav; Shuhui Cai; Kathryn J Schunke; Nauder Faraday; Peter C M van Zijl; Jiadi Xu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  d-glucose weighted chemical exchange saturation transfer (glucoCEST)-based dynamic glucose enhanced (DGE) MRI at 3T: early experience in healthy volunteers and brain tumor patients.

Authors:  Xiang Xu; Akansha Ashvani Sehgal; Nirbhay N Yadav; John Laterra; Lindsay Blair; Jaishri Blakeley; Anina Seidemo; Jennifer M Coughlin; Martin G Pomper; Linda Knutsson; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  CEST MR-Fingerprinting: Practical considerations and insights for acquisition schedule design and improved reconstruction.

Authors:  Or Perlman; Kai Herz; Moritz Zaiss; Ouri Cohen; Matthew S Rosen; Christian T Farrar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  High-sensitivity CEST mapping using a spatiotemporal correlation-enhanced method.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Suyi Cao; Raymond C Koehler; Peter C M van Zijl; Jiadi Xu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 9.  CEST, ASL, and magnetization transfer contrast: How similar pulse sequences detect different phenomena.

Authors:  Linda Knutsson; Jiadi Xu; André Ahlgren; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  In vivo magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Technological advances and opportunities for applications continue to abound.

Authors:  Peter van Zijl; Linda Knutsson
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.