Literature DB >> 31872916

d-glucose weighted chemical exchange saturation transfer (glucoCEST)-based dynamic glucose enhanced (DGE) MRI at 3T: early experience in healthy volunteers and brain tumor patients.

Xiang Xu1,2, Akansha Ashvani Sehgal1,2, Nirbhay N Yadav1,2, John Laterra3, Lindsay Blair3, Jaishri Blakeley3, Anina Seidemo4, Jennifer M Coughlin5, Martin G Pomper1, Linda Knutsson1,4, Peter C M van Zijl1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dynamic glucose enhanced (DGE) MRI has shown potential for imaging glucose delivery and blood-brain barrier permeability at fields of 7T and higher. Here, we evaluated issues involved with translating d-glucose weighted chemical exchange saturation transfer (glucoCEST) experiments to the clinical field strength of 3T.
METHODS: Exchange rates of the different hydroxyl proton pools and the field-dependent T2 relaxivity of water in d-glucose solution were used to simulate the water saturation spectra (Z-spectra) and DGE signal differences as a function of static field strength B0 , radiofrequency field strength B1 , and saturation time tsat . Multislice DGE experiments were performed at 3T on 5 healthy volunteers and 3 glioma patients.
RESULTS: Simulations showed that DGE signal decreases with B0 , because of decreased contributions of glucoCEST and transverse relaxivity, as well as coalescence of the hydroxyl and water proton signals in the Z-spectrum. At 3T, because of this coalescence and increased interference of direct water saturation and magnetization transfer contrast, the DGE effect can be assessed over a broad range of saturation frequencies. Multislice DGE experiments were performed in vivo using a B1 of 1.6 µT and a tsat of 1 second, leading to a small glucoCEST DGE effect at an offset frequency of 2 ppm from the water resonance. Motion correction was essential to detect DGE effects reliably.
CONCLUSION: Multislice glucoCEST-based DGE experiments can be performed at 3T with sufficient temporal resolution. However, the effects are small and prone to motion influence. Therefore, motion correction should be used when performing DGE experiments at clinical field strengths.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CEST; T2 relaxation; Z-spectrum; d-glucose; fast exchange; glioma; glucoCEST; motion correction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31872916      PMCID: PMC7083699          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  47 in total

1.  Characterizing white matter with magnetization transfer and T(2).

Authors:  G J Stanisz; A Kecojevic; M J Bronskill; R M Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Magnetization transfer in MRI: a review.

Authors:  R M Henkelman; G J Stanisz; S J Graham
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 tesla.

Authors:  J P Wansapura; S K Holland; R S Dunn; W S Ball
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  GlucoCEST imaging with on-resonance variable delay multiple pulse (onVDMP) MRI.

Authors:  Xiang Xu; Jiadi Xu; Kannie W Y Chan; Jing Liu; Huanling Liu; Yuguo Li; Lin Chen; Guanshu Liu; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Adiabatically prepared spin-lock approach for T1ρ-based dynamic glucose enhanced MRI at ultrahigh fields.

Authors:  Patrick Schuenke; Christina Koehler; Andreas Korzowski; Johannes Windschuh; Peter Bachert; Mark E Ladd; Sibu Mundiyanapurath; Daniel Paech; Sebastian Bickelhaupt; David Bonekamp; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Alexander Radbruch; Moritz Zaiss
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Water saturation shift referencing (WASSR) for chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) experiments.

Authors:  Mina Kim; Joseph Gillen; Bennett A Landman; Jinyuan Zhou; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Natural D-glucose as a biodegradable MRI relaxation agent.

Authors:  Nirbhay N Yadav; Jiadi Xu; Amnon Bar-Shir; Qin Qin; Kannie W Y Chan; Ksenija Grgac; Wenbo Li; Michael T McMahon; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Steady-state brain glucose concentrations during hypoglycemia in healthy humans and patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Kim C C van de Ven; Marinette van der Graaf; Cees J Tack; Arend Heerschap; Bastiaan E de Galan
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 9.461

9.  Mapping brain glucose uptake with chemical exchange-sensitive spin-lock magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tao Jin; Hunter Mehrens; Kristy S Hendrich; Seong-Gi Kim
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 6.200

10.  Fast and Quantitative T1ρ-weighted Dynamic Glucose Enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Patrick Schuenke; Daniel Paech; Christina Koehler; Johannes Windschuh; Peter Bachert; Mark E Ladd; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Alexander Radbruch; Moritz Zaiss
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  9 in total

1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced CEST MRI using a low molecular weight dextran.

Authors:  Zheng Han; Chuheng Chen; Xiang Xu; Renyuan Bai; Verena Staedtke; Jianpan Huang; Kannie W Y Chan; Jiadi Xu; David O Kamson; Zhibo Wen; Linda Knutsson; Peter C M van Zijl; Guanshu Liu
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  GlucoCEST MRI for the Evaluation Response to Chemotherapeutic and Metabolic Treatments in a Murine Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Comparison with[18F]F-FDG-PET.

Authors:  Martina Capozza; Annasofia Anemone; Chetan Dhakan; Melania Della Peruta; Martina Bracesco; Sara Zullino; Daisy Villano; Enzo Terreno; Dario Livio Longo; Silvio Aime
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Towards robust glucose chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging in humans at 3 T: Arterial input function measurements and the effects of infusion time.

Authors:  Anina Seidemo; Patrick M Lehmann; Anna Rydhög; Ronnie Wirestam; Gunther Helms; Yi Zhang; Nirbhay N Yadav; Pia C Sundgren; Peter C M van Zijl; Linda Knutsson
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.478

4.  In vitro and in vivo comparison of MRI chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) properties between native glucose and 3-O-Methyl-D-glucose in a murine tumor model.

Authors:  Annasofia Anemone; Martina Capozza; Francesca Arena; Sara Zullino; Paola Bardini; Enzo Terreno; Dario Livio Longo; Silvio Aime
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2021-08-22       Impact factor: 4.478

Review 5.  Repurposing Clinical Agents for Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Current Status and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Zelong Chen; Zheng Han; Guanshu Liu
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-24

Review 6.  Molecular Imaging of Brain Tumors and Drug Delivery Using CEST MRI: Promises and Challenges.

Authors:  Jianpan Huang; Zilin Chen; Se-Weon Park; Joseph H C Lai; Kannie W Y Chan
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 6.321

7.  GLINT: GlucoCEST in neoplastic tumors at 3 T-clinical results of GlucoCEST in gliomas.

Authors:  Benjamin Bender; Kai Herz; Anagha Deshmane; Vivien Richter; Ghazaleh Tabatabai; Jens Schittenhelm; Marco Skardelly; Klaus Scheffler; Ulrike Ernemann; Mina Kim; Xavier Golay; Moritz Zaiss; Tobias Lindig
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 8.  The potential of advanced MR techniques for precision radiotherapy of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Patrick L Y Tang; Alejandra Méndez Romero; Jaap P M Jaspers; Esther A H Warnert
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 9.  What do we know about dynamic glucose-enhanced (DGE) MRI and how close is it to the clinics? Horizon 2020 GLINT consortium report.

Authors:  Mina Kim; Afroditi Eleftheriou; Luca Ravotto; Bruno Weber; Michal Rivlin; Gil Navon; Martina Capozza; Annasofia Anemone; Dario Livio Longo; Silvio Aime; Moritz Zaiss; Kai Herz; Anagha Deshmane; Tobias Lindig; Benjamin Bender; Xavier Golay
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 2.310

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.