Literature DB >> 28432505

3D double-echo steady-state sequence assessment of hip joint cartilage and labrum at 3 Tesla: comparative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative data.

Christoph Schleich1, Tobias Hesper2, Harish S Hosalkar3,4, Fanni Rettegi5, Christoph Zilkens5, Rüdiger Krauspe5, Gerald Antoch1, Bernd Bittersohl5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of a high-resolution, three-dimensional (3D) double-echo steady-state (DESS) sequence with radial imaging at 3 Tesla (T) for evaluating cartilage and labral alterations in the hip.
METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data obtained at 3 T, including radially reformatted DESS images and intraoperative data of 45 patients (mean age 42 ± 13.7 years) who underwent hip arthroscopy, were compared. The acetabular cartilage and labrum of the upper hemisphere of the acetabulum and the central femoral head cartilage were evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and negative and positive predictive values were determined.
RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the DESS technique were 96.7%, 75% and 93.7% for detecting cartilage lesions and 98%, 76.2% and 95.9% for detecting labral lesions. The positive and negative predictive values for detecting or ruling out cartilage lesions were 96% and 78.9%. For labral lesions, the positive and negative predictive values were 97.5% and 80%.
CONCLUSION: A high-resolution, 3D DESS technique with radial imaging at 3 T demonstrated high accuracy for detecting hip cartilage and labral lesions with excellent interobserver agreement and moderate correlation between MRI and intraoperative assessment. KEY POINTS: • High-resolution, 3D DESS with radial imaging allows accurate cartilage and labrum evaluation. • DESS demonstrated high sensitivity, specificity, accuracy for detecting cartilage and labral lesions. • Highly accurate sequence may influence treatment decisions in patients with hip pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D DESS; Acetabular labrum; Hip arthroscopy; Hip cartilage; Magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28432505     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4834-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  22 in total

1.  Correlation of magnetic resonance arthrography with revision hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Joseph C McCarthy; Philip J Glassner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Hip MR arthrography and femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Ara Kassarjian
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Acetabular labrum tears. Diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  R H Fitzgerald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy.

Authors:  F R Noyes; C L Stabler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Morphological imaging and T2 and T2* mapping of hip cartilage at 7 Tesla MRI under the influence of intravenous gadolinium.

Authors:  Andrea Lazik-Palm; Oliver Kraff; Christina Geis; Sören Johst; Juliane Goebel; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick; Jens M Theysohn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip: detection of labral and chondral abnormalities using noncontrast imaging.

Authors:  Douglas N Mintz; Timothy Hooper; David Connell; Robert Buly; Douglas E Padgett; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and morphologic MRI of cartilage in the long-term follow-up after Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD).

Authors:  Arne Holstein; Christoph Zilkens; Bernd Bittersohl; Marcus Jäger; Tanja Haamberg; Tallal C Mamisch; Rotem S Lanzman; Patric Kröpil; Dirk Blondin; Rüdiger Krauspe; Gerald Antoch; Günther Fürst; Falk Miese
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.735

8.  Diagnostic performance of direct traction MR arthrography of the hip: detection of chondral and labral lesions with arthroscopic comparison.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Andrea Klauser; Michael Kogler; Benjamin Henninger; Thomas Forstner; Markus Reichkendler; Ehrenfried Schmaranzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Hip imaging in clinical trials in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  G E Gold; F Cicuttini; M D Crema; F Eckstein; A Guermazi; R Kijowski; T M Link; E Maheu; J Martel-Pelletier; C G Miller; J-P Pelletier; C G Peterfy; H G Potter; F W Roemer; D J Hunter
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  MR arthrography of the hip: diagnostic performance of a dedicated water-excitation 3D double-echo steady-state sequence to detect cartilage lesions.

Authors:  Patrick R Knuesel; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Hubert P Noetzli; Claudio Dora; Marco Zanetti; Juerg Hodler; Bernd Kuehn; Marius R Schmid
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  7 in total

1.  What is the Prevalence of Hip Intra-Articular Pathologies and Osteoarthritis in Active Athletes with Hip and Groin Pain Compared with Those Without? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Joshua J Heerey; Joanne L Kemp; Andrea B Mosler; Denise M Jones; Tania Pizzari; Mark J Scholes; Rintje Agricola; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Differences of radiocarpal cartilage alterations in arthritis and osteoarthritis using morphological and biochemical magnetic resonance imaging without gadolinium-based contrast agent administration.

Authors:  Valentina Mori; Lino M Sawicki; Philipp Sewerin; Markus Eichner; Benedikt M Schaarschmidt; Lisa Oezel; Sebastian Gehrmann; Bernd Bittersohl; Gerald Antoch; Christoph Schleich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Clinical validation of the use of prototype software for automatic cartilage segmentation to quantify knee cartilage in volunteers.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Ran Xu Zhang; Xiao Shuai Chen; Xiao Yue Zhou; Esther Raithel; Jian Ling Cui; Jian Zhao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Cam morphology is associated with MRI-defined cartilage defects and labral tears: a case-control study of 237 young adult football players with and without hip and groin pain.

Authors:  Joshua Heerey; Joanne Kemp; Rintje Agricola; Ramya Srinivasan; Anne Smith; Tania Pizzari; Matthew King; Peter Lawrenson; Mark Scholes; Thomas Link; Richard Souza; Sharmila Majumdar; Kay Crossley
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2021-12-15

5.  Prevalence of early hip OA features on MRI in high-impact athletes. The femoroacetabular impingement and hip osteoarthritis cohort (FORCe) study.

Authors:  J J Heerey; R Srinivasan; R Agricola; A Smith; J L Kemp; T Pizzari; M G King; P R Lawrenson; M J Scholes; R B Souza; T Link; S Majumdar; K M Crossley
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Best Practices: Hip Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Arvin B Kheterpal; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  The imaging evaluation of acetabular labral lesions.

Authors:  Yuwei Liu; Wei Lu; Kan Ouyang; Zhenhan Deng
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-08-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.