Joseph C McCarthy1, Philip J Glassner. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA, Jcmccarthy1@partners.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic approaches for the diagnosis and treatment of hip disorders are well established; however, there are limited data regarding revision hip arthroscopy. There have been several studies evaluating the findings of MR arthrography with primary hip arthroscopy, but to our knowledge, no study has evaluated the diagnostic value of MR arthrography before revision hip arthroscopy. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We obtained sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MR arthrography to detect labral lesions, chondral lesions and loose bodies before revision hip arthroscopy. METHODS: We performed a single-surgeon, retrospective review of 70 revision hip arthroscopies (62 patients) and assessed the association between MR arthrography findings and intraoperative findings. There were 43 females and 19 males with a mean age of 36 years (range, 17-59 years). Radiographic interpretation was performed by one of four fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists at three institutions, who had at least 5 years of experience. Radiographic findings were compared with surgical findings by one of the authors for calculation of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of MR arthrography for detecting labral tears were 82%, 70%, 94%, and 39%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of MR arthrography for detecting chondral damage were 65%, 90%, 94%, and 50%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of MR arthrography for detecting loose bodies were 33%, 100%, 100%, and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed the utility of MR arthrography to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with ongoing or recurrent symptoms who have had prior hip arthroscopy. Our data show that MR arthrography is superior at ruling in, rather than ruling out, labral lesions, chondral lesions, and loose bodies, as there were studies interpreted as normal which in fact showed disorders.
BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic approaches for the diagnosis and treatment of hip disorders are well established; however, there are limited data regarding revision hip arthroscopy. There have been several studies evaluating the findings of MR arthrography with primary hip arthroscopy, but to our knowledge, no study has evaluated the diagnostic value of MR arthrography before revision hip arthroscopy. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We obtained sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MR arthrography to detect labral lesions, chondral lesions and loose bodies before revision hip arthroscopy. METHODS: We performed a single-surgeon, retrospective review of 70 revision hip arthroscopies (62 patients) and assessed the association between MR arthrography findings and intraoperative findings. There were 43 females and 19 males with a mean age of 36 years (range, 17-59 years). Radiographic interpretation was performed by one of four fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists at three institutions, who had at least 5 years of experience. Radiographic findings were compared with surgical findings by one of the authors for calculation of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of MR arthrography for detecting labral tears were 82%, 70%, 94%, and 39%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of MR arthrography for detecting chondral damage were 65%, 90%, 94%, and 50%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of MR arthrography for detecting loose bodies were 33%, 100%, 100%, and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed the utility of MR arthrography to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with ongoing or recurrent symptoms who have had prior hip arthroscopy. Our data show that MR arthrography is superior at ruling in, rather than ruling out, labral lesions, chondral lesions, and loose bodies, as there were studies interpreted as normal which in fact showed disorders.
Authors: Arturo Makino; D Luis Muscolo; Miguel Puigdevall; Matias Costa-Paz; Miguel Ayerza Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2005-07-11 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Andrew J Ziegert; Donna G Blankenbaker; Arthur A De Smet; James S Keene; Kazuhiko Shinki; Jason P Fine Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Michael K Shindle; James E Voos; Shane J Nho; Benton E Heyworth; Bryan T Kelly Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Benjamin K Potter; Brett A Freedman; Romney C Andersen; John A Bojescul; Timothy R Kuklo; Kevin P Murphy Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2005-04-12 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: James A Keeney; Michael W Peelle; Jennifer Jackson; David Rubin; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Hermes H Miozzari; Marco Celia; John M Clark; Stefan Werlen; Florian D Naal; Hubert P Nötzli Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Florian Schmaranzer; Pascal C Haefeli; Emanuel F Liechti; Markus S Hanke; Moritz Tannast; Lorenz Büchler Journal: Cartilage Date: 2020-07-19 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Jeffrey Kay; Nicole Simunovic; Olufemi R Ayeni; Mohit Bhandari; Asheesh Bedi; Teppo Järvinen; Volker Musahl; Douglas Naudie; Matti Seppänen; Gerard Slobogean; Lehana Thabane; Andrew Duong; Matthew Skelly; Ajay Shanmugaraj; Sarah Crouch; Sheila Sprague; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Lisa Buckingham; Tim Ramsay; John Lee; Petteri Kousa; Sasha Carsen; Hema Choudur; Yan Sim; Kelly Johnston; Ivan Wong; Ryland Murphy; Sara Sparavalo; Daniel Whelan; Ryan Khan; Gavin C A Wood; Fiona Howells; Heather Grant; Bryn Zomar; Michael Pollock; Kevin Willits; Andrew Firth; Stacey Wanlin; Alliya Remtulla; Nicole Kaniki; Etienne L Belzile; Sylvie Turmel; Uffe Jørgensen; Annie Gam-Pedersen; Raine Sihvonen; Marko Raivio Sihvonen; Pirjo Toivonen Sihvonen; Mari Pirjetta Routapohja Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2022-04-05