OBJECTIVES: To assess diagnostic performance of traction MR arthrography of the hip in detection and grading of chondral and labral lesions with arthroscopic comparison. METHODS: Seventy-five MR arthrograms obtained ± traction of 73 consecutive patients (mean age, 34.5 years; range, 14-54 years) who underwent arthroscopy were included. Traction technique included weight-adapted traction (15-23 kg), a supporting plate for the contralateral leg, and intra-articular injection of 18-27 ml (local anaesthetic and contrast agent). Patients reported on neuropraxia and on pain. Two blinded readers independently assessed femoroacetabular cartilage and labrum lesions which were correlated with arthroscopy. Interobserver agreement was calculated using κ values. Joint distraction ± traction was evaluated in consensus. RESULTS: No procedure had to be stopped. There were no cases of neuropraxia. Accuracy for detection of labral lesions was 92 %/93 %, 91 %/83 % for acetabular lesions, and 92 %/88 % for femoral cartilage lesions for reader 1/reader 2, respectively. Interobserver agreement was moderate (κ = 0.58) for grading of labrum lesions and substantial (κ = 0.7, κ = 0.68) for grading of acetabular and femoral cartilage lesions. Joint distraction was achieved in 72/75 and 14/75 hips with/without traction, respectively. CONCLUSION: Traction MR arthrography safely enabled accurate detection and grading of labral and chondral lesions. KEY POINTS: • The used traction technique was well tolerated by most patients. • The used traction technique almost consistently achieved separation of cartilage layers. • Traction MR arthrography enabled accurate detection of chondral and labral lesions.
OBJECTIVES: To assess diagnostic performance of traction MR arthrography of the hip in detection and grading of chondral and labral lesions with arthroscopic comparison. METHODS: Seventy-five MR arthrograms obtained ± traction of 73 consecutive patients (mean age, 34.5 years; range, 14-54 years) who underwent arthroscopy were included. Traction technique included weight-adapted traction (15-23 kg), a supporting plate for the contralateral leg, and intra-articular injection of 18-27 ml (local anaesthetic and contrast agent). Patients reported on neuropraxia and on pain. Two blinded readers independently assessed femoroacetabular cartilage and labrum lesions which were correlated with arthroscopy. Interobserver agreement was calculated using κ values. Joint distraction ± traction was evaluated in consensus. RESULTS: No procedure had to be stopped. There were no cases of neuropraxia. Accuracy for detection of labral lesions was 92 %/93 %, 91 %/83 % for acetabular lesions, and 92 %/88 % for femoral cartilage lesions for reader 1/reader 2, respectively. Interobserver agreement was moderate (κ = 0.58) for grading of labrum lesions and substantial (κ = 0.7, κ = 0.68) for grading of acetabular and femoral cartilage lesions. Joint distraction was achieved in 72/75 and 14/75 hips with/without traction, respectively. CONCLUSION: Traction MR arthrography safely enabled accurate detection and grading of labral and chondral lesions. KEY POINTS: • The used traction technique was well tolerated by most patients. • The used traction technique almost consistently achieved separation of cartilage layers. • Traction MR arthrography enabled accurate detection of chondral and labral lesions.
Authors: Andrew J Ziegert; Donna G Blankenbaker; Arthur A De Smet; James S Keene; Kazuhiko Shinki; Jason P Fine Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Douglas N Mintz; Timothy Hooper; David Connell; Robert Buly; Douglas E Padgett; Hollis G Potter Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: C Czerny; S Hofmann; M Urban; C Tschauner; A Neuhold; M Pretterklieber; M P Recht; J Kramer Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Jutta Ellermann; Connor Ziegler; Mikko J Nissi; Rainer Goebel; John Hughes; Michael Benson; Peter Holmberg; Patrick Morgan Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-02-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Lucas A Anderson; Christopher L Peters; Brandon B Park; Gregory J Stoddard; Jill A Erickson; Julia R Crim Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Eva Llopis; Luis Cerezal; Ara Kassarjian; Victoria Higueras; Ernesto Fernandez Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Luis Cerezal; Luis Pérez Carro; Javier Llorca; Moisés Fernández-Hernando; Eva Llopis; Juan Antonio Montero; Ana Canga Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Corinne A Zurmühle; Helen Anwander; Christoph E Albers; Markus S Hanke; Simon D Steppacher; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: George Konstantinidis; Michael Mitchell; Gordon Boyd; Catherine Coady; Swagata Ghosh; Ivan Wong Journal: Cartilage Date: 2019-01-23 Impact factor: 4.634