Literature DB >> 25465714

Diagnostic performance of direct traction MR arthrography of the hip: detection of chondral and labral lesions with arthroscopic comparison.

Florian Schmaranzer1, Andrea Klauser, Michael Kogler, Benjamin Henninger, Thomas Forstner, Markus Reichkendler, Ehrenfried Schmaranzer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess diagnostic performance of traction MR arthrography of the hip in detection and grading of chondral and labral lesions with arthroscopic comparison.
METHODS: Seventy-five MR arthrograms obtained ± traction of 73 consecutive patients (mean age, 34.5 years; range, 14-54 years) who underwent arthroscopy were included. Traction technique included weight-adapted traction (15-23 kg), a supporting plate for the contralateral leg, and intra-articular injection of 18-27 ml (local anaesthetic and contrast agent). Patients reported on neuropraxia and on pain. Two blinded readers independently assessed femoroacetabular cartilage and labrum lesions which were correlated with arthroscopy. Interobserver agreement was calculated using κ values. Joint distraction ± traction was evaluated in consensus.
RESULTS: No procedure had to be stopped. There were no cases of neuropraxia. Accuracy for detection of labral lesions was 92 %/93 %, 91 %/83 % for acetabular lesions, and 92 %/88 % for femoral cartilage lesions for reader 1/reader 2, respectively. Interobserver agreement was moderate (κ = 0.58) for grading of labrum lesions and substantial (κ = 0.7, κ = 0.68) for grading of acetabular and femoral cartilage lesions. Joint distraction was achieved in 72/75 and 14/75 hips with/without traction, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Traction MR arthrography safely enabled accurate detection and grading of labral and chondral lesions. KEY POINTS: • The used traction technique was well tolerated by most patients. • The used traction technique almost consistently achieved separation of cartilage layers. • Traction MR arthrography enabled accurate detection of chondral and labral lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25465714     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3534-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  23 in total

Review 1.  Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  D Tönnis; A Heinecke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Comparison of standard hip MR arthrographic imaging planes and sequences for detection of arthroscopically proven labral tear.

Authors:  Andrew J Ziegert; Donna G Blankenbaker; Arthur A De Smet; James S Keene; Kazuhiko Shinki; Jason P Fine
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Efficacy of surgery for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vincent Y Ng; Naveen Arora; Thomas M Best; Xueliang Pan; Thomas J Ellis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip: detection of labral and chondral abnormalities using noncontrast imaging.

Authors:  Douglas N Mintz; Timothy Hooper; David Connell; Robert Buly; Douglas E Padgett; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  MR arthrography of the adult acetabular capsular-labral complex: correlation with surgery and anatomy.

Authors:  C Czerny; S Hofmann; M Urban; C Tschauner; A Neuhold; M Pretterklieber; M P Recht; J Kramer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Acetabular cartilage assessment in patients with femoroacetabular impingement by using T2* mapping with arthroscopic verification.

Authors:  Jutta Ellermann; Connor Ziegler; Mikko J Nissi; Rainer Goebel; John Hughes; Michael Benson; Peter Holmberg; Patrick Morgan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Acetabular cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular impingement. Risk factors and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis.

Authors:  Lucas A Anderson; Christopher L Peters; Brandon B Park; Gregory J Stoddard; Jill A Erickson; Julia R Crim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Direct MR arthrography of the hip with leg traction: feasibility for assessing articular cartilage.

Authors:  Eva Llopis; Luis Cerezal; Ara Kassarjian; Victoria Higueras; Ernesto Fernandez
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  New developments in hip imaging.

Authors:  Reto Sutter; Marco Zanetti; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Hip MRI: how useful is intraarticular contrast material for evaluating surgically proven lesions of the labrum and articular cartilage?

Authors:  Reto Sutter; Veronika Zubler; Adrienne Hoffmann; Nadja Mamisch-Saupe; Claudio Dora; Fabian Kalberer; Marco Zanetti; Juerg Hodler; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  23 in total

1.  Usefulness of MR arthrography of the hip with leg traction in the evaluation of ligamentum teres injuries.

Authors:  Luis Cerezal; Luis Pérez Carro; Javier Llorca; Moisés Fernández-Hernando; Eva Llopis; Juan Antonio Montero; Ana Canga
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  MR arthrography of the hip: evaluation of isotropic 3D intermediate-weighted FSE and hybrid GRE T1-weighted sequences.

Authors:  Giovanni Foti; Antonio Campacci; Michele Conati; Mirko Trentadue; Claudio Zorzi; Giovanni Carbognin
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Effect of elbow MRI with axial traction on articular cartilage visibility-a feasibility study.

Authors:  Sho Kohyama; Toshikazu Tanaka; Koshiro Shimasaki; Sayaka Kobayashi; Akira Ikumi; Takaji Yanai; Naoyuki Ochiai
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Periacetabular Osteotomy Provides Higher Survivorship Than Rim Trimming for Acetabular Retroversion.

Authors:  Corinne A Zurmühle; Helen Anwander; Christoph E Albers; Markus S Hanke; Simon D Steppacher; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Poor Sensitivity of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography to Detect Hip Chondral Delamination: A Retrospective Follow-Up of 227 FAI-Operated Patients.

Authors:  George Konstantinidis; Michael Mitchell; Gordon Boyd; Catherine Coady; Swagata Ghosh; Ivan Wong
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 6.  [Impingement of the hip].

Authors:  F Schmaranzer; M Hanke; T Lerch; S Steppacher; K Siebenrock; M Tannast
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Elbow MR arthrography with traction.

Authors:  Ryan K L Lee; James F Griffith; Brian T Y Yuen; Alex W H Ng; David K W Yeung
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  [Femoroacetabular impingement - Update 2019].

Authors:  Andreas Heuck; Michael Dienst; Christian Glaser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  3D double-echo steady-state sequence assessment of hip joint cartilage and labrum at 3 Tesla: comparative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative data.

Authors:  Christoph Schleich; Tobias Hesper; Harish S Hosalkar; Fanni Rettegi; Christoph Zilkens; Rüdiger Krauspe; Gerald Antoch; Bernd Bittersohl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  [Labral pathologies of the hip joint].

Authors:  C Czerny; C Chiari; I Nöbauer-Huhmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.