Literature DB >> 28389693

The Advantages and Challenges of Using FDG PET/CT for Response Assessment in Melanoma in the Era of Targeted Agents and Immunotherapy.

Annie N M Wong1,2, Grant A McArthur1,2, Michael S Hofman3, Rodney J Hicks4,5.   

Abstract

The treatment of melanoma has been revolutionised in recent years by advances in the understanding of the genomic landscape of this disease, which has led to the development of new targeted therapeutic agents, and the ability to therapeutically manipulate the immune system through inhibition of cancer cell-T-cell interactions that prevent an adaptive immune response. While these therapeutic interventions have dramatically improved the prospects of survival for patients with advanced melanoma, they bring significant complexity to the interpretation of therapeutic response because their mechanisms and temporal profile of response vary considerably. In this review, we discuss the mode of action of these emerging therapies and their toxicities to provide a framework for the use of FDG PET/CT in therapeutic response assessment. We propose that the greatest utility of PET in assessment of response to agents that abrogate signalling related to BRAF mutation is for early assessment of resistance, while in anti-CTLA4 therapy, immunological flare can compromise early assessment of response but can identify potentially life-threatening autoimmune reactions. For anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy, the role of FDG PET/CT is more akin to its use in other solid malignancies undergoing treatment with conventional chemotherapy. However, further research is required to optimise the timing of scans and response criteria in this disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF; Immune response; Melanoma; PET; Therapeutic monitoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28389693     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3691-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  71 in total

1.  Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined dabrafenib and trametinib.

Authors:  Caroline Robert; Boguslawa Karaszewska; Jacob Schachter; Piotr Rutkowski; Andrzej Mackiewicz; Daniil Stroiakovski; Michael Lichinitser; Reinhard Dummer; Florent Grange; Laurent Mortier; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Kamil Drucis; Ivana Krajsova; Axel Hauschild; Paul Lorigan; Pascal Wolter; Georgina V Long; Keith Flaherty; Paul Nathan; Antoni Ribas; Anne-Marie Martin; Peng Sun; Wendy Crist; Jeff Legos; Stephen D Rubin; Shonda M Little; Dirk Schadendorf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Anti-PD-1-Related Pneumonitis during Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Mizuki Nishino; Lynette M Sholl; F Stephen Hodi; Hiroto Hatabu; Nikhil H Ramaiya
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Progress and promise of FDG-PET imaging for cancer patient management and oncologic drug development.

Authors:  Gary J Kelloff; John M Hoffman; Bruce Johnson; Howard I Scher; Barry A Siegel; Edward Y Cheng; Bruce D Cheson; Joyce O'shaughnessy; Kathryn Z Guyton; David A Mankoff; Lalitha Shankar; Steven M Larson; Caroline C Sigman; Richard L Schilsky; Daniel C Sullivan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Changes in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 18F-fluorodeoxythymidine positron emission tomography imaging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib.

Authors:  Linda Mileshkin; Rodney J Hicks; Brett G M Hughes; Paul L R Mitchell; Veena Charu; Barbara J Gitlitz; David Macfarlane; Benjamin Solomon; Lukas C Amler; Wei Yu; Andrea Pirzkall; Bernard M Fine
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib improves the antitumor activity of adoptive cell immunotherapy.

Authors:  Richard C Koya; Stephen Mok; Nicholas Otte; Kevin J Blacketor; Begonya Comin-Anduix; Paul C Tumeh; Aspram Minasyan; Nicholas A Graham; Thomas G Graeber; Thinle Chodon; Antoni Ribas
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Long-term results from a randomized phase II trial of standard- versus higher-dose imatinib mesylate for patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors expressing KIT.

Authors:  Charles D Blanke; George D Demetri; Margaret von Mehren; Michael C Heinrich; Burton Eisenberg; Jonathan A Fletcher; Christopher L Corless; Christopher D M Fletcher; Peter J Roberts; Daniela Heinz; Elisabeth Wehre; Zariana Nikolova; Heikki Joensuu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Patterns of onset and resolution of immune-related adverse events of special interest with ipilimumab: detailed safety analysis from a phase 3 trial in patients with advanced melanoma.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Weber; Reinhard Dummer; Veerle de Pril; Celeste Lebbé; F Stephen Hodi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  MAP Kinase Inhibition Promotes T Cell and Anti-tumor Activity in Combination with PD-L1 Checkpoint Blockade.

Authors:  Peter J R Ebert; Jeanne Cheung; Yagai Yang; Erin McNamara; Rebecca Hong; Marina Moskalenko; Stephen E Gould; Heather Maecker; Bryan A Irving; Jeong M Kim; Marcia Belvin; Ira Mellman
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 31.745

9.  BRAF inhibition is associated with enhanced melanoma antigen expression and a more favorable tumor microenvironment in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Dennie T Frederick; Adriano Piris; Alexandria P Cogdill; Zachary A Cooper; Cecilia Lezcano; Cristina R Ferrone; Devarati Mitra; Andrea Boni; Lindsay P Newton; Chengwen Liu; Weiyi Peng; Ryan J Sullivan; Donald P Lawrence; F Stephen Hodi; Willem W Overwijk; Gregory Lizée; George F Murphy; Patrick Hwu; Keith T Flaherty; David E Fisher; Jennifer A Wargo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  RAS mutations in cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors.

Authors:  Fei Su; Amaya Viros; Carla Milagre; Kerstin Trunzer; Gideon Bollag; Olivia Spleiss; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Xiangju Kong; Richard C Koya; Keith T Flaherty; Paul B Chapman; Min Jung Kim; Robert Hayward; Matthew Martin; Hong Yang; Qiongqing Wang; Holly Hilton; Julie S Hang; Johannes Noe; Maryou Lambros; Felipe Geyer; Nathalie Dhomen; Ion Niculescu-Duvaz; Alfonso Zambon; Dan Niculescu-Duvaz; Natasha Preece; Lídia Robert; Nicholas J Otte; Stephen Mok; Damien Kee; Yan Ma; Chao Zhang; Gaston Habets; Elizabeth A Burton; Bernice Wong; Hoa Nguyen; Mark Kockx; Luc Andries; Brian Lestini; Keith B Nolop; Richard J Lee; Andrew K Joe; James L Troy; Rene Gonzalez; Thomas E Hutson; Igor Puzanov; Bartosz Chmielowski; Caroline J Springer; Grant A McArthur; Jeffrey A Sosman; Roger S Lo; Antoni Ribas; Richard Marais
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  PET and SPECT imaging of melanoma: the state of the art.

Authors:  Weijun Wei; Emily B Ehlerding; Xiaoli Lan; Quanyong Luo; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Noninvasive PET Imaging of T cells.

Authors:  Weijun Wei; Dawei Jiang; Emily B Ehlerding; Quanyong Luo; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2018-04-17

3.  The new era of cancer immunotherapy: what can molecular imaging do to help?

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Marion de Jong; Silvana Del Vecchio; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2017-07-21

Review 4.  The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for predicting or monitoring immunotherapy response in patients with metastatic melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Narjess Ayati; Ramin Sadeghi; Zahra Kiamanesh; Sze Ting Lee; S Rasoul Zakavi; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Therapy monitoring with PET in cancer patients: achievements, opportunities and challenges ahead for the PET community.

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Immune Checkpoint Imaging in Oncology: A Game Changer Toward Personalized Immunotherapy?

Authors:  Susanne Lütje; Georg Feldmann; Markus Essler; Peter Brossart; Ralph A Bundschuh
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Absolute number of new lesions on 18F-FDG PET/CT is more predictive of clinical response than SUV changes in metastatic melanoma patients receiving ipilimumab.

Authors:  Hoda Anwar; Christos Sachpekidis; Julia Winkler; Annette Kopp-Schneider; Uwe Haberkorn; Jessica C Hassel; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Evaluating response to immunotherapy with 18F-FDG PET/CT: where do we stand?

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Michel De Pontdeville; Egesta Lopci
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  18F-FDG-PET detects complete response to PD1-therapy in melanoma patients two weeks after therapy start.

Authors:  Ferdinand Seith; Andrea Forschner; Holger Schmidt; Christina Pfannenberg; Brigitte Gückel; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christian la Fougère; Claus Garbe; Nina Schwenzer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Clinical characteristics of patient selection and imaging predictors of outcome in solid tumors treated with checkpoint-inhibitors.

Authors:  Sabrina Rossi; Luca Toschi; Angelo Castello; Fabio Grizzi; Luigi Mansi; Egesta Lopci
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.