Literature DB >> 15837727

Progress and promise of FDG-PET imaging for cancer patient management and oncologic drug development.

Gary J Kelloff1, John M Hoffman, Bruce Johnson, Howard I Scher, Barry A Siegel, Edward Y Cheng, Bruce D Cheson, Joyce O'shaughnessy, Kathryn Z Guyton, David A Mankoff, Lalitha Shankar, Steven M Larson, Caroline C Sigman, Richard L Schilsky, Daniel C Sullivan.   

Abstract

2-[(18)F]Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) assesses a fundamental property of neoplasia, the Warburg effect. This molecular imaging technique offers a complementary approach to anatomic imaging that is more sensitive and specific in certain cancers. FDG-PET has been widely applied in oncology primarily as a staging and restaging tool that can guide patient care. However, because it accurately detects recurrent or residual disease, FDG-PET also has significant potential for assessing therapy response. In this regard, it can improve patient management by identifying responders early, before tumor size is reduced; nonresponders could discontinue futile therapy. Moreover, a reduction in the FDG-PET signal within days or weeks of initiating therapy (e.g., in lymphoma, non-small cell lung, and esophageal cancer) significantly correlates with prolonged survival and other clinical end points now used in drug approvals. These findings suggest that FDG-PET could facilitate drug development as an early surrogate of clinical benefit. This article reviews the scientific basis of FDG-PET and its development and application as a valuable oncology imaging tool. Its potential to facilitate drug development in seven oncologic settings (lung, lymphoma, breast, prostate, sarcoma, colorectal, and ovary) is addressed. Recommendations include initial validation against approved therapies, retrospective analyses to define the magnitude of change indicative of response, further prospective validation as a surrogate of clinical benefit, and application as a phase II/III trial end point to accelerate evaluation and approval of novel regimens and therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15837727     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  210 in total

1.  Usefulness of positron emission mammography in the evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Irma Soldevilla-Gallardo; Sevastian S Medina-Ornelas; Cynthia Villarreal-Garza; Enrique Bargalló-Rocha; Claudia Hs Caro-Sánchez; Rodrigo Hernández-Ramírez; Enrique Estrada-Lobato
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-20

2.  Pharmacodynamic evaluation of irinotecan therapy by FDG and FLT PET/CT imaging in a colorectal cancer xenograft model.

Authors:  Sarah R Mudd; Kimberley D Holich; Martin J Voorbach; Todd B Cole; David R Reuter; Paul Tapang; Gail Bukofzer; Arunava Chakravartty; Cherrie K Donawho; Joann P Palma; Gerard B Fox; Mark Day; Yanping Luo
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  Positron emission tomography in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Leonarda Galiuto; Lazzaro Paraggio; Alberto R De Caterina; Elisa Fedele; Gabriella Locorotondo; Lucia Leccisotti; Alessandro Giordano; Antonio G Rebuzzi; Filippo Crea
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Micro-chemical synthesis of molecular probes on an electronic microfluidic device.

Authors:  Pei Yuin Keng; Supin Chen; Huijiang Ding; Saman Sadeghi; Gaurav J Shah; Alex Dooraghi; Michael E Phelps; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Arion F Chatziioannou; Chang-Jin Kim; R Michael van Dam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Development of radiotracers for oncology--the interface with pharmacology.

Authors:  Rohini Sharma; Eric Aboagye
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 6.  Non-invasive metabolic imaging of brain tumours in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Michelle M Kim; Abhijit Parolia; Mark P Dunphy; Sriram Venneti
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Biases in Multicenter Longitudinal PET Standardized Uptake Value Measurements.

Authors:  Robert K Doot; Larry A Pierce; Darrin Byrd; Brian Elston; Keith C Allberg; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

8.  Tumor response assessment in locally advanced colon cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jorge Arredondo; Ignacio González; Jorge Baixauli; Patricia Martínez; Javier Rodríguez; Carlos Pastor; María Jesús Ribelles; Jesús Javier Sola; José Luís Hernández-Lizoain
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-04

9.  Low expression of hexokinase-2 is associated with false-negative FDG-positron emission tomography in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Leo Rasche; Edgardo Angtuaco; James E McDonald; Amy Buros; Caleb Stein; Charlotte Pawlyn; Sharmilan Thanendrarajan; Carolina Schinke; Rohan Samant; Shmuel Yaccoby; Brian A Walker; Joshua Epstein; Maurizio Zangari; Frits van Rhee; Tobias Meissner; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Kari Hemminki; Richard Houlston; Bart Barlogie; Faith E Davies; Gareth J Morgan; Niels Weinhold
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 10.  Warburg, me and Hexokinase 2: Multiple discoveries of key molecular events underlying one of cancers' most common phenotypes, the "Warburg Effect", i.e., elevated glycolysis in the presence of oxygen.

Authors:  Peter L Pedersen
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.945

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.