Literature DB >> 28815334

Clinical characteristics of patient selection and imaging predictors of outcome in solid tumors treated with checkpoint-inhibitors.

Sabrina Rossi1, Luca Toschi1, Angelo Castello2, Fabio Grizzi3, Luigi Mansi4, Egesta Lopci5,6.   

Abstract

The rapidly evolving knowledge on tumor immunology and the continuous implementation of immunotherapy in cancer have recently led to the FDA and EMA approval of several checkpoint inhibitors as immunotherapic agents in clinical practice. Anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, and anti-PDL-1 antibodies are becoming standard of care in advanced melanoma, as well as in relapsed or metastatic lung and kidney cancer, demonstrating higher and longer response compared to standard chemotherapy. These encouraging results have fostered the evaluation of these antibodies either alone or in combination with other therapies in several dozen clinical trials for the treatment of multiple tumor types. However, not all patients respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors, hence, specific biomarkers are necessary to guide and monitor therapy. The utility of PD-L1 expression as a biomarker has varied in different clinical trials, but, to date, no consensus has been reached on whether PD-L1 expression is an ideal marker for response and patient selection; approximately 20-25% of patients will respond to immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors despite a negative PD-L1 staining. On the other hand, major issues concern the evaluation of objective response in patients treated with immunotherapy. Pure morphological criteria as commonly used in solid tumors (i.e. RECIST) are not sufficient because change in size is not an early and reliable marker of tumor response to biological therapies. Thus, the scientific community has required a continuous adaptation of immune-related response criteria (irRC) to overcome the problem. In this context, metabolic information and antibody-based imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) have been investigated, providing a powerful approach for an optimal stratification of patients at staging and during the evaluation of the response to therapy. In the present review we provide an overview on the clinical characteristics of patient selection when using imaging predictors of outcome in solid tumors treated with checkpoint-inhibitors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Checkpoint inhibitors; FDG-PET; Immune-PET; Immune-related response criteria; Immunotherapy; Predictive biomarkers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28815334     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3802-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  94 in total

1.  Experience in daily practice with ipilimumab for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma: an early increase in lymphocyte and eosinophil counts is associated with improved survival.

Authors:  J Delyon; C Mateus; D Lefeuvre; E Lanoy; L Zitvogel; N Chaput; S Roy; A M M Eggermont; E Routier; C Robert
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Preclinical Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution Studies of 89Zr-Labeled Pembrolizumab.

Authors:  Christopher G England; Emily B Ehlerding; Reinier Hernandez; Brian T Rekoske; Stephen A Graves; Haiyan Sun; Glenn Liu; Douglas G McNeel; Todd E Barnhart; Weibo Cai
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Edward B Garon; Naiyer A Rizvi; Rina Hui; Natasha Leighl; Ani S Balmanoukian; Joseph Paul Eder; Amita Patnaik; Charu Aggarwal; Matthew Gubens; Leora Horn; Enric Carcereny; Myung-Ju Ahn; Enriqueta Felip; Jong-Seok Lee; Matthew D Hellmann; Omid Hamid; Jonathan W Goldman; Jean-Charles Soria; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; Ruth Z Rutledge; Jin Zhang; Jared K Lunceford; Reshma Rangwala; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Charlotte Roach; Kenneth Emancipator; Leena Gandhi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Metabolic Competition in the Tumor Microenvironment Is a Driver of Cancer Progression.

Authors:  Chih-Hao Chang; Jing Qiu; David O'Sullivan; Michael D Buck; Takuro Noguchi; Jonathan D Curtis; Qiongyu Chen; Mariel Gindin; Matthew M Gubin; Gerritje J W van der Windt; Elena Tonc; Robert D Schreiber; Edward J Pearce; Erika L Pearce
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert J Motzer; Bernard Escudier; David F McDermott; Saby George; Hans J Hammers; Sandhya Srinivas; Scott S Tykodi; Jeffrey A Sosman; Giuseppe Procopio; Elizabeth R Plimack; Daniel Castellano; Toni K Choueiri; Howard Gurney; Frede Donskov; Petri Bono; John Wagstaff; Thomas C Gauler; Takeshi Ueda; Yoshihiko Tomita; Fabio A Schutz; Christian Kollmannsberger; James Larkin; Alain Ravaud; Jason S Simon; Li-An Xu; Ian M Waxman; Padmanee Sharma
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Survival, durable tumor remission, and long-term safety in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab.

Authors:  Suzanne L Topalian; Mario Sznol; David F McDermott; Harriet M Kluger; Richard D Carvajal; William H Sharfman; Julie R Brahmer; Donald P Lawrence; Michael B Atkins; John D Powderly; Philip D Leming; Evan J Lipson; Igor Puzanov; David C Smith; Janis M Taube; Jon M Wigginton; Georgia D Kollia; Ashok Gupta; Drew M Pardoll; Jeffrey A Sosman; F Stephen Hodi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Mechanism-driven biomarkers to guide immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Suzanne L Topalian; Janis M Taube; Robert A Anders; Drew M Pardoll
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Differential association of STK11 and TP53 with KRAS mutation-associated gene expression, proliferation and immune surveillance in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  M B Schabath; E A Welsh; W J Fulp; L Chen; J K Teer; Z J Thompson; B E Engel; M Xie; A E Berglund; B C Creelan; S J Antonia; J E Gray; S A Eschrich; D-T Chen; W D Cress; E B Haura; A A Beg
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 10.  Myeloid derived suppressor cells - a new therapeutic target in the treatment of cancer.

Authors:  Robert Wesolowski; Joseph Markowitz; William E Carson
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 13.751

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive PET Imaging of T cells.

Authors:  Weijun Wei; Dawei Jiang; Emily B Ehlerding; Quanyong Luo; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2018-04-17

Review 2.  The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for predicting or monitoring immunotherapy response in patients with metastatic melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Narjess Ayati; Ramin Sadeghi; Zahra Kiamanesh; Sze Ting Lee; S Rasoul Zakavi; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Potential of Novel Methyl Jasmonate Analogs as Anticancer Agents to Metabolically Target HK-2 Activity in Glioblastoma Cells.

Authors:  Damla Uludağ; Sadık Bay; Bilgesu Onur Sucu; Özgecan Şavluğ İpek; Thomas Mohr; Mustafa Güzel; Nihal Karakaş
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 5.988

4.  The immune-metabolic-prognostic index and clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma under checkpoint inhibitors.

Authors:  Angelo Castello; Luca Toschi; Sabrina Rossi; Emanuela Mazziotti; Egesta Lopci
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  ImmunoPET: Concept, Design, and Applications.

Authors:  Weijun Wei; Zachary T Rosenkrans; Jianjun Liu; Gang Huang; Quan-Yong Luo; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Monitoring anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with FDG PET: introduction of iPERCIST.

Authors:  Lucas Goldfarb; Boris Duchemann; Kader Chouahnia; Laurent Zelek; Michael Soussan
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.138

7.  Clinical challenges in neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hanfei Guo; Wenqian Li; Lei Qian; Jiuwei Cui
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  Correlation Between 18F-FDG Uptake and Immune Cell Infiltration in Metastatic Brain Lesions.

Authors:  Young-Sil An; Se-Hyuk Kim; Tae Hoon Roh; So Hyun Park; Tae-Gyu Kim; Jang-Hee Kim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  FDG PET/CT for assessing tumour response to immunotherapy : Report on the EANM symposium on immune modulation and recent review of the literature.

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Rodney J Hicks; Christophe Le Tourneau; Stéphanie Lheureux; Stefano Fanti; Egesta Lopci
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  The efficiency of 18F-FDG PET-CT for predicting the major pathologic response to the neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiuli Tao; Ning Li; Ning Wu; Jie He; Jianming Ying; Shugeng Gao; Shuhang Wang; Jie Wang; Zhijie Wang; Yun Ling; Wei Tang; Zewei Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.