Literature DB >> 21364032

Changes in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 18F-fluorodeoxythymidine positron emission tomography imaging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib.

Linda Mileshkin1, Rodney J Hicks, Brett G M Hughes, Paul L R Mitchell, Veena Charu, Barbara J Gitlitz, David Macfarlane, Benjamin Solomon, Lukas C Amler, Wei Yu, Andrea Pirzkall, Bernard M Fine.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Assessing clinical activity of molecularly targeted anticancer agents, especially in the absence of tumor shrinkage, is challenging. To evaluate on-treatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and/or 18F-fluorodeoxythymidine (FLT) positron emission tomography (PET) for this purpose, we conducted a prospective multicenter trial assessing PET response rates and associations with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 2nd/3rd-line non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with erlotinib. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: PET/computed tomography (CT) scans were conducted at baseline, day (d)14 and d56 after the first daily erlotinib dose, with diagnostic CT at baseline and d56 (all scans centrally reviewed). PET partial metabolic response (PMR) was defined as a mean decrease (in ≤ 5 lesions/patient) of 15% or more maximum standardized uptake value. PFS was investigator-determined.
RESULTS: Of 74 erlotinib-treated patients, 51 completed all imaging assessments through d56; 13 of 51 (26%) FDG-evaluable patients had PMR at d14, as did 9 of 50 (18%) FLT-evaluable patients. Four (7.8%) showed partial responses (PR) by d56 CT; all 4 had PMR by d14 FDG-PET with 3 PMRs by d14 FLT-PET. Three of the 4 patients with CT PR had evaluable archival tumor tissue; all 3 had epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. D14 and d56 PMRs by FDG or FLT were associated with improved PFS; HRs for PET responders versus nonresponders were 0.3 to 0.4. D14 FDG-PET PMR was associated with improved OS (P = 0.03) compared with FDG-PET nonresponders.
CONCLUSION: Early (d14) FDG-PET PMR is associated with improved PFS and OS, even in the absence of subsequent Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response. These data support inclusion of FDG-PET imaging in clinical trials testing novel targeted therapies, particularly those with anticipated cytostatic effects. ©2011 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21364032     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  47 in total

1.  Phase I dose-escalation and -expansion study of buparlisib (BKM120), an oral pan-Class I PI3K inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Jordi Rodon; Irene Braña; Lillian L Siu; Maja J De Jonge; Natasha Homji; David Mills; Emmanuelle Di Tomaso; Celine Sarr; Lucia Trandafir; Cristian Massacesi; Ferry Eskens; Johanna C Bendell
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  PET-CT in the staging and treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Patricia Ibeas; Blanca Cantos; José Manuel Gasent; Begoña Rodríguez; Mariano Provencio
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Translational imaging endpoints to predict treatment response to novel targeted anticancer agents.

Authors:  Natalie J Serkova
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 18.500

4.  Assessment of very early response evaluation with 18F-FDG-PET/CT predicts survival in erlotinib treated NSCLC patients-A comparison of methods.

Authors:  Joan Fledelius; Anne Winther-Larsen; Azza A Khalil; Karin Hjorthaug; Jørgen Frøkiær; Peter Meldgaard
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-02-05

5.  (18)F-FDG PET/CT for monitoring treatment responses to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib.

Authors:  Matthias R Benz; Ken Herrmann; Franziska Walter; Edward B Garon; Karen L Reckamp; Robert Figlin; Michael E Phelps; Wolfgang A Weber; Johannes Czernin; Martin S Allen-Auerbach
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Marked, homogeneous, and early [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography responses to vemurafenib in BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma.

Authors:  Grant A McArthur; Igor Puzanov; Ravi Amaravadi; Antoni Ribas; Paul Chapman; Kevin B Kim; Jeffrey A Sosman; Richard J Lee; Keith Nolop; Keith T Flaherty; Jason Callahan; Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  The role of radionuclide probes for monitoring anti-tumor drugs efficacy: A brief review.

Authors:  Renata Salgado Fernandes; Carolina de Aguiar Ferreira; Daniel Cristian Ferreira Soares; Anna Margherita Maffione; Danyelle M Townsend; Domenico Rubello; André Luís Branco de Barros
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 6.529

Review 8.  What are we learning from the cancer genome?

Authors:  Eric A Collisson; Raymond J Cho; Joe W Gray
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  Quantitative Imaging in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; David A Mankoff; Lawrence H Schwartz; Frank S Lieberman; John M Buatti; James M Mountz; Bradley J Erickson; Fiona M M Fennessy; Wei Huang; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Richard L Wahl; Hannah M Linden; Paul E Kinahan; Binsheng Zhao; Nola M Hylton; Robert J Gillies; Laurence Clarke; Robert Nordstrom; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  TLG-S criteria are superior to both EORTC and PERCIST for predicting outcomes in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with erlotinib.

Authors:  Kung-Chu Ho; Yu-Hua Dean Fang; Hsiao-Wen Chung; Yuan-Chang Liu; John Wen-Cheng Chang; Ming-Mo Hou; Cheng-Ta Yang; Nai-Ming Cheng; Tzu-Pei Su; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.