BACKGROUND: Cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas and keratoacanthomas are common findings in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. METHODS: We performed a molecular analysis to identify oncogenic mutations (HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, CDKN2A, and TP53) in the lesions from patients treated with the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. An analysis of an independent validation set and functional studies with BRAF inhibitors in the presence of the prevalent RAS mutation was also performed. RESULTS: Among 21 tumor samples, 13 had RAS mutations (12 in HRAS). In a validation set of 14 samples, 8 had RAS mutations (4 in HRAS). Thus, 60% (21 of 35) of the specimens harbored RAS mutations, the most prevalent being HRAS Q61L. Increased proliferation of HRAS Q61L-mutant cell lines exposed to vemurafenib was associated with mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-pathway signaling and activation of ERK-mediated transcription. In a mouse model of HRAS Q61L-mediated skin carcinogenesis, the vemurafenib analogue PLX4720 was not an initiator or a promoter of carcinogenesis but accelerated growth of the lesions harboring HRAS mutations, and this growth was blocked by concomitant treatment with a MEK inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS: Mutations in RAS, particularly HRAS, are frequent in cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas and keratoacanthomas that develop in patients treated with vemurafenib. The molecular mechanism is consistent with the paradoxical activation of MAPK signaling and leads to accelerated growth of these lesions. (Funded by Hoffmann-La Roche and others; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00405587, NCT00949702, NCT01001299, and NCT01006980.).
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas and keratoacanthomas are common findings in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. METHODS: We performed a molecular analysis to identify oncogenic mutations (HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, CDKN2A, and TP53) in the lesions from patients treated with the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. An analysis of an independent validation set and functional studies with BRAF inhibitors in the presence of the prevalent RAS mutation was also performed. RESULTS: Among 21 tumor samples, 13 had RAS mutations (12 in HRAS). In a validation set of 14 samples, 8 had RAS mutations (4 in HRAS). Thus, 60% (21 of 35) of the specimens harbored RAS mutations, the most prevalent being HRAS Q61L. Increased proliferation of HRAS Q61L-mutant cell lines exposed to vemurafenib was associated with mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-pathway signaling and activation of ERK-mediated transcription. In a mouse model of HRAS Q61L-mediated skin carcinogenesis, the vemurafenib analogue PLX4720 was not an initiator or a promoter of carcinogenesis but accelerated growth of the lesions harboring HRAS mutations, and this growth was blocked by concomitant treatment with a MEK inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS: Mutations in RAS, particularly HRAS, are frequent in cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas and keratoacanthomas that develop in patients treated with vemurafenib. The molecular mechanism is consistent with the paradoxical activation of MAPK signaling and leads to accelerated growth of these lesions. (Funded by Hoffmann-La Roche and others; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00405587, NCT00949702, NCT01001299, and NCT01006980.).
Authors: Ana González-García; Catrin A Pritchard; Hugh F Paterson; Georgia Mavria; Gordon Stamp; Christopher J Marshall Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Jessie Villanueva; Adina Vultur; John T Lee; Rajasekharan Somasundaram; Mizuho Fukunaga-Kalabis; Angela K Cipolla; Bradley Wubbenhorst; Xiaowei Xu; Phyllis A Gimotty; Damien Kee; Ademi E Santiago-Walker; Richard Letrero; Kurt D'Andrea; Anitha Pushparajan; James E Hayden; Kimberly Dahlman Brown; Sylvie Laquerre; Grant A McArthur; Jeffrey A Sosman; Katherine L Nathanson; Meenhard Herlyn Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Ramin Nazarian; Hubing Shi; Qi Wang; Xiangju Kong; Richard C Koya; Hane Lee; Zugen Chen; Mi-Kyung Lee; Narsis Attar; Hooman Sazegar; Thinle Chodon; Stanley F Nelson; Grant McArthur; Jeffrey A Sosman; Antoni Ribas; Roger S Lo Journal: Nature Date: 2010-11-24 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Hong Yang; Brian Higgins; Kenneth Kolinsky; Kathryn Packman; Zenaida Go; Raman Iyer; Stanley Kolis; Sylvia Zhao; Richard Lee; Joseph F Grippo; Kathleen Schostack; Mary Ellen Simcox; David Heimbrook; Gideon Bollag; Fei Su Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Andrew C White; Kathy Tran; Joan Khuu; Christine Dang; Yongyan Cui; Scott W Binder; William E Lowry Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-04-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Eric W Joseph; Christine A Pratilas; Poulikos I Poulikakos; Madhavi Tadi; Weiqing Wang; Barry S Taylor; Ensar Halilovic; Yogindra Persaud; Feng Xing; Agnes Viale; James Tsai; Paul B Chapman; Gideon Bollag; David B Solit; Neal Rosen Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-07-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jonas N Søndergaard; Ramin Nazarian; Qi Wang; Deliang Guo; Teli Hsueh; Stephen Mok; Hooman Sazegar; Laura E MacConaill; Jordi G Barretina; Sarah M Kehoe; Narsis Attar; Erika von Euw; Jonathan E Zuckerman; Bartosz Chmielowski; Begoña Comin-Anduix; Richard C Koya; Paul S Mischel; Roger S Lo; Antoni Ribas Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2010-04-20 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Mohammad Atefi; Earl Avramis; Amanda Lassen; Deborah J L Wong; Lidia Robert; David Foulad; Michael Cerniglia; Bjoern Titz; Thinle Chodon; Thomas G Graeber; Begonya Comin-Anduix; Antoni Ribas Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Che-Hung Shen; Ping Yuan; Rolando Perez-Lorenzo; Yaqing Zhang; Sze Xian Lee; Yang Ou; John M Asara; Lewis C Cantley; Bin Zheng Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 17.970