Tobias Huber1, Markus Paschold1, Christian Hansen2, Tom Wunderling2, Hauke Lang1, Werner Kneist3. 1. Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medicine of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. 2. Department of Simulation and Graphics, Faculty of Computer Science, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. 3. Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medicine of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. werner.kneist@unimedizin-mainz.de.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Virtual reality (VR) and head mount displays (HMDs) have been advanced for multimedia and information technologies but have scarcely been used in surgical training. Motion sickness and individual psychological changes have been associated with VR. The goal was to observe first experiences and performance scores using a new combined highly immersive virtual reality (IVR) laparoscopy setup. METHODS: During the study, 10 members of the surgical department performed three tasks (fine dissection, peg transfer, and cholecystectomy) on a VR simulator. We then combined a VR HMD with the VR laparoscopic simulator and displayed the simulation on a 360° video of a laparoscopic operation to create an IVR laparoscopic simulation. The tasks were then repeated. Validated questionnaires on immersion and motion sickness were used for the study. RESULTS: Participants' times for fine dissection were significantly longer during the IVR session (regular: 86.51 s [62.57 s; 119.62 s] vs. IVR: 112.35 s [82.08 s; 179.40 s]; p = 0.022). The cholecystectomy task had higher error rates during IVR. Motion sickness did not occur at any time for any participant. Participants experienced a high level of exhilaration, rarely thought about others in the room, and had a high impression of presence in the generated IVR world. CONCLUSION: This is the first clinical and technical feasibility study using the full IVR laparoscopy setup combined with the latest laparoscopic simulator in a 360° surrounding. Participants were exhilarated by the high level of immersion. The setup enables a completely new generation of surgical training.
INTRODUCTION: Virtual reality (VR) and head mount displays (HMDs) have been advanced for multimedia and information technologies but have scarcely been used in surgical training. Motion sickness and individual psychological changes have been associated with VR. The goal was to observe first experiences and performance scores using a new combined highly immersive virtual reality (IVR) laparoscopy setup. METHODS: During the study, 10 members of the surgical department performed three tasks (fine dissection, peg transfer, and cholecystectomy) on a VR simulator. We then combined a VR HMD with the VR laparoscopic simulator and displayed the simulation on a 360° video of a laparoscopic operation to create an IVR laparoscopic simulation. The tasks were then repeated. Validated questionnaires on immersion and motion sickness were used for the study. RESULTS:Participants' times for fine dissection were significantly longer during the IVR session (regular: 86.51 s [62.57 s; 119.62 s] vs. IVR: 112.35 s [82.08 s; 179.40 s]; p = 0.022). The cholecystectomy task had higher error rates during IVR. Motion sickness did not occur at any time for any participant. Participants experienced a high level of exhilaration, rarely thought about others in the room, and had a high impression of presence in the generated IVR world. CONCLUSION: This is the first clinical and technical feasibility study using the full IVR laparoscopy setup combined with the latest laparoscopic simulator in a 360° surrounding. Participants were exhilarated by the high level of immersion. The setup enables a completely new generation of surgical training.
Authors: Jonathan S Abelson; Elliott Silverman; Jason Banfelder; Alexandra Naides; Ricardo Costa; Gregory Dakin Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Sam R Sharar; William Miller; Aubriana Teeley; Maryam Soltani; Hunter G Hoffman; Mark P Jensen; David R Patterson Journal: Expert Rev Neurother Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.618
Authors: Kinga A Powers; Scott T Rehrig; Noel Irias; Hedwig A Albano; Andrew Malinow; Stephanie B Jones; Donald W Moorman; John B Pawlowski; Daniel B Jones Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2007-12-11 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Tobias Huber; Tom Wunderling; Markus Paschold; Hauke Lang; Werner Kneist; Christian Hansen Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2017-11-18 Impact factor: 2.924