Literature DB >> 32067096

Ultra-high-fidelity virtual reality mastoidectomy simulation training: a randomized, controlled trial.

Andreas Frithioff1,2, Martin Frendø3,4, Peter Trier Mikkelsen5, Mads Sølvsten Sørensen3, Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ultra-high-fidelity (UHF) graphics in virtual reality (VR) simulation might improve surgical skill acquisition in temporal bone training. This study aims to compare UHF VR simulation training with conventional, screen-based VR simulation training (cVR) with respect to performance and cognitive load (CL).
METHODS: In a randomized trial with a cross-over design, 24 students completed a total of four mastoidectomies in a VR temporal bone surgical simulator: two performances under UHF conditions using a digital microscope and two performances under conventional conditions using screen-based VR simulation. Performances were assessed by two blinded raters using an established assessment tool. In addition, CL was estimated as the relative change in secondary-task reaction time during simulation when compared with individual baseline measurements. Data were analyzed using linear mixed model analysis for repeated measurements.
RESULTS: The mean final-product performance score was significantly lower in UHF VR simulation compared to cVR simulation [mean difference 1.0 points out of 17 points, 95% CI (0.2-1.7), p = 0.02]. The most important factor for performance during UHF simulation was the ability to achieve stereovision (mean difference = 3.4 points, p < 0.001). Under the UHF VR condition, CL was significantly higher than during cVR (28% vs. 18%, respectively, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: UHF graphics in VR simulation training reduced performance and induced a higher CL in novices than conventional, screen-based VR simulation training. Consequently, UHF VR simulation training should be preceded by cVR training and might be better suited for the training of intermediates or experienced surgeons.

Keywords:  Cadaveric dissection; Mastoidectomy; Simulation-based training; Surgical education; Temporal bone surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32067096     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-05858-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  24 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies.

Authors:  Jeroen J G van Merriënboer; John Sweller
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Can virtual reality simulator be used as a training aid to improve cadaver temporal bone dissection? Results of a randomized blinded control trial.

Authors:  Yi C Zhao; Gregor Kennedy; Kumiko Yukawa; Brian Pyman; Stephen O'Leary
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Cognitive load and performance in immersive virtual reality versus conventional virtual reality simulation training of laparoscopic surgery: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Joakim Grant Frederiksen; Stine Maya Dreier Sørensen; Lars Konge; Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen; Morten Nobel-Jørgensen; Flemming Bjerrum; Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Mastoidectomy performance assessment of virtual simulation training using final-product analysis.

Authors:  Steven A W Andersen; Per Cayé-Thomasen; Mads S Sørensen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training.

Authors:  Stanley J Hamstra; Ryan Brydges; Rose Hatala; Benjamin Zendejas; David A Cook
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 6.  Otologic Skills Training.

Authors:  Gregory J Wiet; Mads Sølvsten Sørensen; Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Decentralized virtual reality mastoidectomy simulation training: a prospective, mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Martin Frendø; Ebbe Thingaard; Lars Konge; Mads Sølvsten Sørensen; Steven A W Andersen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Thrive or overload? The effect of task complexity on novices' simulation-based learning.

Authors:  Faizal A Haji; Jeffrey J H Cheung; Nicole Woods; Glenn Regehr; Sandrine de Ribaupierre; Adam Dubrowski
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality in Surgical Training-A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Yeshwanth Pulijala; Minhua Ma; Matthew Pears; David Peebles; Ashraf Ayoub
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Towards immersive virtual reality (iVR): a route to surgical expertise.

Authors:  Saurabh Dargar; Rebecca Kennedy; WeiXuan Lai; Venkata Arikatla; Suvranu De
Journal:  J Comput Surg       Date:  2015-05-07
View more
  6 in total

1.  Emerging simulation technologies in global craniofacial surgical training.

Authors:  Divya Mehrotra; A F Markus
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-06-27

2.  Simulation-based procedure training (SBPT) in rarely performed procedures: a blueprint for theory-informed design considerations.

Authors:  David Gent; Ranjev Kainth
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-08

3.  A virtual simulation experiment platform of subway emergency ventilation system and study on its teaching effect.

Authors:  Sihui Dong; Fei Yu; Kang Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  Outcomes, Measurement Instruments, and Their Validity Evidence in Randomized Controlled Trials on Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality in Undergraduate Medical Education: Systematic Mapping Review.

Authors:  Lorainne Tudor Car; Bhone Myint Kyaw; Andrew Teo; Tatiana Erlikh Fox; Sunitha Vimalesvaran; Christian Apfelbacher; Sandra Kemp; Niels Chavannes
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.364

5.  Skepticism towards advancing VR technology - student acceptance of VR as a teaching and assessment tool in medicine.

Authors:  Steffen Walter; Robert Speidel; Alexander Hann; Janine Leitner; Lucia Jerg-Bretzke; Peter Kropp; Jakob Garbe; Florian Ebner
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2021-09-15

Review 6.  Defining medical simulators for simulation-based education in EUS: Theoretical approach and a narrative review.

Authors:  Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen; Michael Patrick Achiam
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.275

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.