Literature DB >> 29551011

IMHOTEP: virtual reality framework for surgical applications.

Micha Pfeiffer1, Hannes Kenngott2, Anas Preukschas2, Matthias Huber3, Lisa Bettscheider2, Beat Müller-Stich2, Stefanie Speidel4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The data which is available to surgeons before, during and after surgery is steadily increasing in quantity as well as diversity. When planning a patient's treatment, this large amount of information can be difficult to interpret. To aid in processing the information, new methods need to be found to present multimodal patient data, ideally combining textual, imagery, temporal and 3D data in a holistic and context-aware system.
METHODS: We present an open-source framework which allows handling of patient data in a virtual reality (VR) environment. By using VR technology, the workspace available to the surgeon is maximized and 3D patient data is rendered in stereo, which increases depth perception. The framework organizes the data into workspaces and contains tools which allow users to control, manipulate and enhance the data. Due to the framework's modular design, it can easily be adapted and extended for various clinical applications.
RESULTS: The framework was evaluated by clinical personnel (77 participants). The majority of the group stated that a complex surgical situation is easier to comprehend by using the framework, and that it is very well suited for education. Furthermore, the application to various clinical scenarios-including the simulation of excitation propagation in the human atrium-demonstrated the framework's adaptability. As a feasibility study, the framework was used during the planning phase of the surgical removal of a large central carcinoma from a patient's liver.
CONCLUSION: The clinical evaluation showed a large potential and high acceptance for the VR environment in a medical context. The various applications confirmed that the framework is easily extended and can be used in real-time simulation as well as for the manipulation of complex anatomical structures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced medical visualization; Surgical planning; Virtual reality

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29551011     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-018-1730-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  11 in total

Review 1.  Augmented and virtual reality in surgery-the digital surgical environment: applications, limitations and legal pitfalls.

Authors:  Wee Sim Khor; Benjamin Baker; Kavit Amin; Adrian Chan; Ketan Patel; Jason Wong
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

2.  Immersive Learning Experiences for Surgical Procedures.

Authors:  Young-Woon Cha; Mingsong Dou; Rohan Chabra; Federico Menozzi; Andrei State; Eric Wallen; Henry Fuchs
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2016

Review 3.  Using virtual reality to investigate psychological processes and mechanisms associated with the onset and maintenance of psychosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lucia R Valmaggia; Fern Day; Mar Rus-Calafell
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  Self-Confidence and Paranoia: An Experimental Study Using an Immersive Virtual Reality Social Situation.

Authors:  Stephanie Atherton; Angus Antley; Nicole Evans; Emma Cernis; Rachel Lister; Graham Dunn; Mel Slater; Daniel Freeman
Journal:  Behav Cogn Psychother       Date:  2014-11-11

5.  New dimensions in surgical training: immersive virtual reality laparoscopic simulation exhilarates surgical staff.

Authors:  Tobias Huber; Markus Paschold; Christian Hansen; Tom Wunderling; Hauke Lang; Werner Kneist
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The effect of virtual reality and training on liver operation planning.

Authors:  C Herfarth; W Lamadé; L Fischer; P Chiu; C Cardenas; M Thorn; M Vetter; L Grenacher; H P Meinzer
Journal:  Swiss Surg       Date:  2002

7.  A randomized, controlled trial of immersive virtual reality analgesia, during physical therapy for pediatric burns.

Authors:  Yuko S Schmitt; Hunter G Hoffman; David K Blough; David R Patterson; Mark P Jensen; Maryam Soltani; Gretchen J Carrougher; Dana Nakamura; Sam R Sharar
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 2.744

Review 8.  Virtual Reality-Enhanced Extinction of Phobias and Post-Traumatic Stress.

Authors:  Jessica L Maples-Keller; Carly Yasinski; Nicole Manjin; Barbara Olasov Rothbaum
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 7.620

9.  Regular three-dimensional presentations improve in the identification of surgical liver anatomy - a randomized study.

Authors:  Beat P Müller-Stich; Nicole Löb; Diana Wald; Thomas Bruckner; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Martina Kadmon; Markus W Büchler; Lars Fischer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Exploring virtual reality technology and the Oculus Rift for the examination of digital pathology slides.

Authors:  Navid Farahani; Robert Post; Jon Duboy; Ishtiaque Ahmed; Brian J Kolowitz; Teppituk Krinchai; Sara E Monaco; Jeffrey L Fine; Douglas J Hartman; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2016-05-04
View more
  5 in total

1.  AR in VR: assessing surgical augmented reality visualizations in a steerable virtual reality environment.

Authors:  Julian Hettig; Sandy Engelhardt; Christian Hansen; Gabriel Mistelbauer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Using virtual 3D-models in surgical planning: workflow of an immersive virtual reality application in liver surgery.

Authors:  Christian Boedecker; Florentine Huettl; Patrick Saalfeld; Markus Paschold; Werner Kneist; Janine Baumgart; Bernhard Preim; Christian Hansen; Hauke Lang; Tobias Huber
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  On the Use of Virtual Reality for Medical Imaging Visualization.

Authors:  Filipi Pires; Carlos Costa; Paulo Dias
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.903

4.  Investigating the utility of VR for spatial understanding in surgical planning: evaluation of head-mounted to desktop display.

Authors:  Georges Hattab; Adamantini Hatzipanayioti; Anna Klimova; Micha Pfeiffer; Peter Klausing; Michael Breucha; Felix von Bechtolsheim; Jens R Helmert; Jürgen Weitz; Sebastian Pannasch; Stefanie Speidel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  IMHOTEP: cross-professional evaluation of a three-dimensional virtual reality system for interactive surgical operation planning, tumor board discussion and immersive training for complex liver surgery in a head-mounted display.

Authors:  Hannes Götz Kenngott; Micha Pfeiffer; Anas Amin Preukschas; Lisa Bettscheider; Philipp Anthony Wise; Martin Wagner; Stefanie Speidel; Matthias Huber; Felix Nickel; Arianeb Mehrabi; Beat Peter Müller-Stich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.584

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.