| Literature DB >> 28377969 |
C Greenwood1, J G Clement2, A J Dicken3, J P O Evans3, I D Lyburn4, R M Martin5, K D Rogers1, N Stone6, G Adams1, P Zioupos1.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is clinically assessed from bone mineral density measurements using dual energy X-ray absorption (DXA). However, these measurements do not always provide an accurate fracture prediction, arguably because DXA does not grapple with 'bone quality', which is a combined result of microarchitecture, texture, bone tissue properties, past loading history, material chemistry and bone physiology in reaction to disease. Studies addressing bone quality are comparatively few if one considers the potential importance of this factor. They suffer due to low number of human osteoporotic specimens, use of animal proxies and/or the lack of differentiation between confounding parameters such as gender and state of diseased bone. The present study considers bone samples donated from patients (n = 37) who suffered a femoral neck fracture and in this very well defined cohort we have produced in previous work fracture toughness measurements (FT) which quantify its ability to resist crack growth which reflects directly the structural integrity of the cancellous bone tissue. We investigated correlations between BV/TV and other microarchitectural parameters; we examined effects that may suggest differences in bone remodelling between males and females and compared the relationships with the FT properties. The data crucially has shown that TbTh, TbSp, SMI and TbN may provide a proxy or surrogate for BV/TV. Correlations between FT critical stress intensity values and microarchitecture parameters (BV/TV, BS/TV, TbN, BS/BV and SMI) for osteoporotic cancellous tissue were observed and are for the first time reported in this study. Overall, this study has not only highlighted that the fracture model based upon BMD could potentially be improved with inclusion of other microarchitecture parameters, but has also given us clear clues as to which of them are more influential in this role.Entities:
Keywords: Bone mineral density (BMD); Computed tomography (CT); Fracture toughness (FT); Microarchitecture; Osteoporosis
Year: 2015 PMID: 28377969 PMCID: PMC5365242 DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2015.10.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bone Rep ISSN: 2352-1872
Demographic characteristics of the cohort of FNF donors. Two thirds of the patients were in the 80–91 years range.
| Donors | 37 |
| Male/Female | 7/30 |
| Number of specimens | 23/57 |
| Age range (years) | 59–96 |
| Age mean (years) | 82.3 (SD = 6.8) |
| Weight range (kg) | 41.3–82.6 |
| Weight mean (kg) | 64.2 (SD = 10.5) |
| Height range (m) | 1.55–1.80 |
| Height mean (m) | 1.67 (SD = 0.08) |
Fig. 1Crack growth emanating from the man-made notch as in the SENB FT tests of Cook and Zioupos (2009) and Ding and Hvid (2000). Following application of bending moments on either side the notch opens up and the trabeculae ahead of it start snapping. The deformation and crack growth was stopped as soon as this first critical load was reached. The load was used to define the Kc value (initial notch width ~ 300 μm.).
Average values of the microarchitectural properties for samples in males and females. Standard deviation values are also provided. P-values denoting significant differences (P < 0.05) between males and females are included. Microarchitecture values from other studies are also provided for comparison.
| Parameter | Females | Males | P-values | Range in the literature | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Std. dev. | Mean | Std. dev. | ||||
| BV/TV | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.92 | 0.16–0.30 | |
| BS/BV (mm− 1) | 16.12 | 3.00 | 17.84 | 2.49 | 0.01 | 10.54–17.8 | |
| TbTh (mm) | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.16–0.25 | |
| TbSp (mm) | 0.60 | 0.14 | 0.52 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.36–0.82 | |
| TbN (mm− 1) | 1.42 | 0.25 | 1.60 | 0.24 | < 0.01 | 1.45–2.11 | |
| DA | 3.27 | 1.07 | 3.34 | 1.08 | 0.61 | 1.73–2.00 | |
| SMI | 1.81 | 0.44 | 1.85 | 0.33 | 0.72 | 0.50–2.61 | |
| TMD (g HAcm− 3) | 0.77 | 0.04 | 0.80 | 0.05 | < 0.01 | 0.72–1.25 | |
| vBMD (g/cm− 3) | 0.29 | 0.08 | 0.31 | 0.08 | 0.40 | 0.22–0.37 | |
Fig. 2Behaviour in-between the various microarchitectural parameters: TbN, TbTh, SMI vs BV/TV and BS/BV. Samples are tagged for male (♂) and female(♀). Least squares regression lines are shown for male (solid) and female (dashed).
Pearson's correlation coefficients and P-values for correlations observed when BV/TV is a function of each microarchitecture parameter and for the case of BS/BV vs SMI.
| Females | Males | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 values | P-values | R2 values | P-values | |
| BS/BV | 0.63 | < 0.01 | 0.61 | < 0.01 |
| TbTh | 0.58 | < 0.01 | 0.67 | < 0.01 |
| TbN | 0.55 | < 0.01 | 0.74 | < 0.01 |
| TbSp | 0.64 | < 0.01 | 0.80 | < 0.01 |
| SMI | 0.42 | < 0.01 | 0.26 | < 0.01 |
| DA | 0.07 | 0.53 | 0.08 | 0.20 |
| BS/BV vs SMI | 0.31 | < 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.03 |
Fig. 3Critical stress intensity (KC) as a function of various microarchitectural properties: (A) BV/TV; (B) BS/TV; (C) TbN; (D) BS/BV; (E). SMI. Samples are tagged for male (♂) and female(♀). Toughness values depend on the orientation of the man-made crack with respect to the trabeculae. In each plot two regression lines are shown for the crack running across the trabeculae (stronger/tougher behaviour: solid line -) and along/in-between the trabeculae (softer/weaker behaviour: dashed line —). In all regressions the slope constants were significantly different from zero (P < 0.05) showing a statistically significant effect of all 5 parameters vs KC. However, because of the noise/scatter in the data the behaviour with respect to the two orthogonal directions (across vs along the trabeculae) was different only for (A) KC vs BV/TV and (C) KC vs TbN. The errors in each data point have been excluded from the graphs for clarity. The mean errors are as follows: BV/TV: 0.06, BS/TV: 0.21, TbN: 0.06, BS/BV: 0.50 and SMI 0.29.
Pearson's correlation coefficients and P-values for correlations observed when critical stress intensity (KC) is a function of each microarchitecture parameter.
| Females | Males | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 values | P-values | R2 values | P-values | |
| BV/TV | 0.29 | < 0.01 | 0.41 | < 0.01 |
| BS/BV | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.17 | 0.05 |
| TbTh | 0.20 | < 0.01 | 0.19 | 0.04 |
| TbN | 0.23 | < 0.01 | 0.4 | < 0.01 |
| TbSp | 0.25 | < 0.01 | 0.44 | < 0.01 |
| SMI | 0.14 | < 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.09 |
| DA | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.20 | 0.04 |
| vTMD | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.52 | < 0.01 |
| vBMD | 0.36 | < 0.01 | 0.45 | < 0.01 |
Fig. 4Critical stress intensity (KC) as a function of (A) TMD; and (B) vBMD. Regression lines are shown for the crack running across the trabeculae (stronger/tougher behaviour: solid line -) and along/in-between the trabeculae (softer/weaker behaviour: dashed line —). Regressions in: the direction across trabeculae: KC = − 2.08⁎⁎ + 1.48⁎⁎ TMD (R2adj = 0.32); KC = − 0.142† + 1.48** vBMD (R2adj = 0.49). In the direction along trabeculae: KC = − 0.844 + 0.669 TMD (R2adj = 0.03); KC = − 0.028 + 0.927* vBMD (R2adj = 0.20). Levels of significance: **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; †P < 0.1.