Literature DB >> 19442628

Density and architecture have greater effects on the toughness of trabecular bone than damage.

Jacqueline G Garrison1, Constance L Slaboch, Glen L Niebur.   

Abstract

Bone damage has been cited as an important aspect of bone quality. As such, understanding the effects of damage on the toughness of trabecular bone should provide insight into trabecular bone behavior during energy-limiting cases, such as falls. The effects of damage on the toughness of 35 bovine trabecular bone specimens were studied. Damage was induced by compressing the on-axis specimens to either 1.5% or 2.5% strain, followed by compression to 7.5% strain. The overloads resulted in significant decreases in both modulus and elastic toughness, with significantly greater decreases for the high-damage group than the low-damage group. Following damage, the elastic toughness of the high-damage group was also lower than the undamaged elastic toughness of the control group. In contrast, there was no detectable effect of damage level on toughness measured to 7.5% strain. Toughness increased linearly with BMD (R(2)=0.50) and by a power law relationship with volume fraction (BV/TV) (R(2)=0.65). Microarchitectural parameters also predicted the toughness in the absence of BV/TV or BMD. Toughness decreased with increasing slenderness ratio (Tb.Sp/Tb.Th) and structure model index (SMI) (R(2)=0.68, multiple regression), again independent of damage level, suggesting that failure is influenced by trabecular buckling. Taken together, the results show that normal variations in toughness due to density and architecture dominate the changes due to damage at the levels induced in this study. Moreover, measuring toughness is sensitive to the final strain, as differences found in the elastic and initial plastic regions were undetectable at higher strains. The self-limiting nature of microcracks in trabecular bone, or the trabecular architecture itself, may inhibit microcracks from propagating to macroscopic trabecular fractures, thereby limiting the effect of damage on toughness and making it difficult to detect in comparison to normal population variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19442628      PMCID: PMC2746406          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.12.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  40 in total

1.  Nonlinear behavior of trabecular bone at small strains.

Authors:  E F Morgan; O C Yeh; W C Chang; T M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Microdamage accumulation in bovine trabecular bone in uniaxial compression.

Authors:  T L Arthur Moore; L J Gibson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Assessment of bone tissue mineralization by conventional x-ray microcomputed tomography: comparison with synchrotron radiation microcomputed tomography and ash measurements.

Authors:  G J Kazakia; A J Burghardt; S Cheung; S Majumdar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  In vivo diffuse damage in human vertebral trabecular bone.

Authors:  D Vashishth; J Koontz; S J Qiu; D Lundin-Cannon; Y N Yeni; M B Schaffler; D P Fyhrie
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Risedronate reverses bone loss in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: results from a multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMD-MN Study Group.

Authors:  I Fogelman; C Ribot; R Smith; D Ethgen; E Sod; J Y Reginster
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Effects of suppressed bone turnover by bisphosphonates on microdamage accumulation and biomechanical properties in clinically relevant skeletal sites in beagles.

Authors:  T Mashiba; C H Turner; T Hirano; M R Forwood; C C Johnston; D B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 7.  Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-02-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Long-term treatment of incadronate disodium accumulates microdamage but improves the trabecular bone microarchitecture in dog vertebra.

Authors:  Satoshi Komatsubara; Satoshi Mori; Tasuku Mashiba; Masako Ito; Jiliang Li; Yoshio Kaji; Tomoyuki Akiyama; Kensaku Miyamoto; Yongping Cao; Jun Kawanishi; Hiromichi Norimatsu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Changes in vertebral strength-density and energy absorption-density relationships following bisphosphonate treatment in beagle dogs.

Authors:  M R Allen; D B Burr
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Microarchitecture influences microdamage accumulation in human vertebral trabecular bone.

Authors:  Monique E Arlot; Brigitte Burt-Pichat; Jean-Paul Roux; Deepak Vashishth; Mary L Bouxsein; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  12 in total

1.  Advancing the deer calcaneus model for bone adaptation studies: ex vivo strains obtained after transecting the tension members suggest an unrecognized important role for shear strains.

Authors:  John G Skedros; Steven C Su; Alex N Knight; Roy D Bloebaum; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Mechanical failure begins preferentially near resorption cavities in human vertebral cancellous bone under compression.

Authors:  C R Slyfield; E V Tkachenko; S E Fischer; K M Ehlert; I H Yi; M G Jekir; R G O'Brien; T M Keaveny; C J Hernandez
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Shear strength and toughness of trabecular bone are more sensitive to density than damage.

Authors:  Jacqueline G Garrison; Joshua A Gargac; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Effects of trabecular type and orientation on microdamage susceptibility in trabecular bone.

Authors:  Xiutao Shi; X Sherry Liu; Xiang Wang; X Edward Guo; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Quantitative relationships between microdamage and cancellous bone strength and stiffness.

Authors:  C J Hernandez; F M Lambers; J Widjaja; C Chapa; C M Rimnac
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  PTH Signaling During Exercise Contributes to Bone Adaptation.

Authors:  Joseph D Gardinier; Fatma Mohamed; David H Kohn
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Changing pattern of femoral fractures in osteogenesis imperfecta with prolonged use of bisphosphonates.

Authors:  N Nicolaou; Y Agrawal; M Padman; J A Fernandes; M J Bell
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  In vivo microdamage is an indicator of susceptibility to initiation and propagation of microdamage in human femoral trabecular bone.

Authors:  Ziheng Wu; Anthony J Laneve; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Alterations in trabecular bone microarchitecture in the ovine spine and distal femur following ovariectomy.

Authors:  Tyler C Kreipke; Nicole C Rivera; Jacqueline G Garrison; Jeremiah T Easley; A Simon Turner; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  The roles of architecture and estrogen depletion in microdamage risk in trabecular bone.

Authors:  Tyler C Kreipke; Jacqueline G Garrison; Jeremiah Easley; A Simon Turner; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.