Literature DB >> 10913921

Trabecular architecture in women and men of similar bone mass with and without vertebral fracture: I. Two-dimensional histology.

L D Hordon1, M Raisi, J E Aaron, S K Paxton, M Beneton, J A Kanis.   

Abstract

While osteoporosis is characterized by a low bone mass there is a well-recognized overlap in bone mineral density (BMD) measurements between groups of subjects with and without vertebral fracture. To investigate whether differences in trabecular architecture may contribute to the presence or absence of fractures independent of the bone mass, fracture and nonfracture groups matched for age, gender, and BMD were assembled. Transiliac biopsies and corresponding lumbar spine BMD measurements from 31 women and 16 men with vertebral fracture were compared with those from 22 women and 11 men without fracture. Lumbar BMD (L1-4) was measured using a Hologic 2000 densitometer. The lumbar BMD was similar in women with and without fracture (0.63 g/cm(3) +/- 0.10 SD and 0.71 g/cm(3) +/- 0.17 SD, n.s.) and in men with and without fracture (0.72 g/cm(3) +/- 0.12 SD and 0.76 g/cm(3) +/- 0.17 SD, n.s.). Undecalcified iliac crest biopsy sections, 8 microm thick, were analyzed for remodeling variables and trabecular architecture using OsteoMeasure and TAS image analysis systems. No significant difference was found in either gender between fracture and nonfracture groups in percent bone volume (mean 10% in all groups), or in the wide range of remodeling and architectural variables measured, including the trabecular width, number, and separation, mean trabecular plate density and fractal dimension, as well as several indirect indices of connectivity including the node:terminus ratio, marrow star volume, and trabecular pattern factor. On the basis of this evidence it was concluded that there is no difference in the trabecular architecture between patients with crush fracture and controls when account is taken of bone mass. This suggests that microanatomical disruption is a predictable intrinsic feature of bone loss. However, there remains the possibility that the two-dimensional character of the structural deterioration measured indirectly is not sufficiently sensitive for the complex cancellous system. This is considered further in part II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10913921     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00329-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  34 in total

1.  A simple, high-yield method for obtaining multipotential mesenchymal progenitor cells from trabecular bone.

Authors:  Richard Tuli; M Reza Seghatoleslami; Suraj Tuli; Mark L Wang; William J Hozack; Paul A Manner; Keith G Danielson; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 2.  The vertebral fracture cascade in osteoporosis: a review of aetiopathogenesis.

Authors:  A M Briggs; A M Greig; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Considerations for development of surrogate endpoints for antifracture efficacy of new treatments in osteoporosis: a perspective.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Variation of trabecular microarchitectural parameters in cranial, caudal and mid-vertebral regions of the ovine L3 vertebra.

Authors:  Oran D Kennedy; Orlaith Brennan; Susan M Rackard; Fergal J O'Brien; David Taylor; T Clive Lee
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 5.  Utility of the trabecular bone score (TBS) in secondary osteoporosis.

Authors:  Fabio M Ulivieri; Barbara C Silva; Francesco Sardanelli; Didier Hans; John P Bilezikian; Renata Caudarella
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Comparative effects of teriparatide and ibandronate on spine bone mineral density (BMD) and microarchitecture (TBS) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a 2-year open-label study.

Authors:  C Senn; B Günther; A W Popp; R Perrelet; D Hans; K Lippuner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Effects of anti-resorptive agents on trabecular bone score (TBS) in older women.

Authors:  M A Krieg; B Aubry-Rozier; D Hans; W D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Standardized Histomorphometric Evaluation of Osteoarthritis in a Surgical Mouse Model.

Authors:  William J Pinamont; Natalie K Yoshioka; Gregory M Young; Vengadeshprabhu Karuppagounder; Elijah L Carlson; Adeel Ahmad; Reyad Elbarbary; Fadia Kamal
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 9.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

10.  Evaluating spine micro-architectural texture (via TBS) discriminates major osteoporotic fractures from controls both as well as and independent of site matched BMD: the Eastern European TBS study.

Authors:  Jelena Vasic; Tzvetanka Petranova; Vladyslav Povoroznyuk; Carmen Gabriela Barbu; Mirjana Karadzic; Filip Gojkovic; Jelena Elez; Renaud Winzenrieth; Didier Hans; Violeta CulaficVojinovic; Catalina Poiana; Nataliia Dzerovych; Rasho Rashkov; Aleksandar Dimic
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.