Literature DB >> 11277263

Mechanical consequences of bone loss in cancellous bone.

J C van der Linden1, J Homminga, J A Verhaar, H Weinans.   

Abstract

The skeleton is continuously being renewed in the bone remodeling process. This prevents accumulation of damage and adapts the architecture to external loads. A side effect is a gradual decrease of bone mass, strength, and stiffness with age. We investigated the effects of bone loss on the load distribution and mechanical properties of cancellous bone using three-dimensional (3D) computer models. Several bone loss scenarios were simulated. Bone matrix was removed at locations of high strain, of low strain, and random throughout the architecture. Furthermore, resorption cavities and thinning of trabeculae were simulated. Removal of 7% of the bone mass at highly strained locations had deleterious effects on the mechanical properties, while up to 50% of the bone volume could be removed at locations of low strain. Thus, if remodeling would be initiated only at highly strained locations, where repair is likely needed, cancellous bone would be continuously at risk of fracture. Thinning of trabeculae resulted in relatively small decreases in stiffness; the same bone loss caused by resorption cavities caused large decreases in stiffness and high strain peaks at the bottom of the cavities. This explains that a reduction in the number and size of resorption cavities in antiresorptive drug treatment can result in large reductions in fracture risk, with small increases in bone mass. Strains in trabeculae surrounding a cavity increased by up to 1,000 microstrains, which could lead to bone apposition. These results give insight in the mechanical effects of bone remodeling and resorption at trabecular level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11277263     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.3.457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  40 in total

Review 1.  Bone quality: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Specialized connective tissue: bone, the structural framework of the upper extremity.

Authors:  Alyssa M Weatherholt; Robyn K Fuchs; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 3.  Fixation principles in metaphyseal bone--a patent based review.

Authors:  R Curtis; J Goldhahn; R Schwyn; P Regazzoni; N Suhm
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  A biomechanical analysis of the effects of resorption cavities on cancellous bone strength.

Authors:  Christopher J Hernandez; Atul Gupta; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  Effects of microarchitecture on bone strength.

Authors:  Jacqueline C van der Linden; Harrie Weinans
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 6.  Regulatory pathways revealing new approaches to the development of anabolic drugs for osteoporosis.

Authors:  T J Martin; N A Sims; K W Ng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Effects of radiation on bone.

Authors:  Rafael Pacheco; Harlan Stock
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 8.  Issues in modern bone histomorphometry.

Authors:  R R Recker; D B Kimmel; D Dempster; R S Weinstein; T J Wronski; D B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Region-dependent bone loss in the lumbar spine following femoral fracture in mice.

Authors:  Erica V Ely; Benjamin Osipov; Armaun J Emami; Blaine A Christiansen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Implications of resolution and noise for in vivo micro-MRI of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Charles Q Li; Jeremy F Magland; Chamith S Rajapakse; X Edward Guo; X Henry Zhang; Branimir Vasilic; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.