Literature DB >> 16904959

Influence of bone volume fraction and architecture on computed large-deformation failure mechanisms in human trabecular bone.

Grant Bevill1, Senthil K Eswaran, Atul Gupta, Panayiotis Papadopoulos, Tony M Keaveny.   

Abstract

Large-deformation bending and buckling have long been proposed as failure mechanisms by which the strength of trabecular bone can be affected disproportionately to changes in bone density, and thus may represent an important aspect of bone quality. We sought here to quantify the contribution of large-deformation failure mechanisms on strength, to determine the dependence of these effects on bone volume fraction and architecture, and to confirm that the inclusion of large-deformation effects in high-resolution finite element models improves predictions of strength versus experiment. Micro-CT-based finite element models having uniform hard tissue material properties were created from 54 cores of human trabecular bone taken from four anatomic sites (age = 70+/-11; 24 male, 27 female donors), which were subsequently biomechanically tested to failure. Strength predictions were made from the models first including, then excluding, large-deformation failure mechanisms, both for compressive and tensile load cases. As expected, strength predictions versus experimental data for the large-deformation finite element models were significantly improved (p < 0.001) relative to the small deformation models in both tension and compression. Below a volume fraction of about 0.20, large-deformation failure mechanisms decreased trabecular strength from 5-80% for compressive loading, while effects were negligible above this volume fraction. Step-wise nonlinear multiple regression revealed that structure model index (SMI) and volume fraction (BV/TV) were significant predictors of these reductions in strength (R2 = 0.83, p < 0.03). Even so, some low-density specimens having nearly identical volume fraction and SMI exhibited up to fivefold differences in strength reduction. We conclude that within very low-density bone, the potentially important biomechanical effect of large-deformation failure mechanisms on trabecular bone strength is highly heterogeneous and is not well explained by standard architectural metrics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16904959     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  55 in total

1.  Irradiation does not modify mechanical properties of cancellous bone under compression.

Authors:  Christopher J Hernandez; Daniel S Ramsey; Stephanie J Dux; Eileen H Chu; Clare M Rimnac
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Methodological considerations for analyzing trabecular architecture: an example from the primate hand.

Authors:  Tracy L Kivell; Matthew M Skinner; Richard Lazenby; Jean-Jacques Hublin
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Effects of microarchitecture on bone strength.

Authors:  Jacqueline C van der Linden; Harrie Weinans
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Side-artifact errors in yield strength and elastic modulus for human trabecular bone and their dependence on bone volume fraction and anatomic site.

Authors:  Grant Bevill; Sarah K Easley; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Locations of bone tissue at high risk of initial failure during compressive loading of the human vertebral body.

Authors:  Senthil K Eswaran; Atul Gupta; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  The trabecular architecture of the superior articular process of the lumbar spine (L2-S1).

Authors:  Susanne Drews; Maiko Matsuura; Reinhard Putz
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Fast trabecular bone strength predictions of HR-pQCT and individual trabeculae segmentation-based plate and rod finite element model discriminate postmenopausal vertebral fractures.

Authors:  X Sherry Liu; Ji Wang; Bin Zhou; Emily Stein; Xiutao Shi; Mark Adams; Elizabeth Shane; X Edward Guo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  In vivo microdamage is an indicator of susceptibility to initiation and propagation of microdamage in human femoral trabecular bone.

Authors:  Ziheng Wu; Anthony J Laneve; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Theoretical bounds for the influence of tissue-level ductility on the apparent-level strength of human trabecular bone.

Authors:  Shashank Nawathe; Frédéric Juillard; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Density and architecture have greater effects on the toughness of trabecular bone than damage.

Authors:  Jacqueline G Garrison; Constance L Slaboch; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.