Literature DB >> 30264229

Interaural Time Difference Perception with a Cochlear Implant and a Normal Ear.

Tom Francart1, Konstantin Wiebe2, Thomas Wesarg2.   

Abstract

Currently there is a growing population of cochlear-implant (CI) users with (near) normal hearing in the non-implanted ear. This configuration is often called SSD (single-sided deafness) CI. The goal of the CI is often to improve spatial perception, so the question raises to what extent SSD CI listeners are sensitive to interaural time differences (ITDs). In a controlled lab setup, sensitivity to ITDs was investigated in 11 SSD CI listeners. The stimuli were 100-pps pulse trains on the CI side and band-limited click trains on the acoustic side. After determining level balance and the delay needed to achieve synchronous stimulation of the two ears, the just noticeable difference in ITD was measured using an adaptive procedure. Seven out of 11 listeners were sensitive to ITDs, with a median just noticeable difference of 438 μs. Out of the four listeners who were not sensitive to ITD, one listener reported binaural fusion, and three listeners reported no binaural fusion. To enable ITD sensitivity, a frequency-dependent delay of the electrical stimulus was required to synchronize the electric and acoustic signals at the level of the auditory nerve. Using subjective fusion measures and refined by ITD sensitivity, it was possible to match a CI electrode to an acoustic frequency range. This shows the feasibility of these measures for the allocation of acoustic frequency ranges to electrodes when fitting a CI to a subject with (near) normal hearing in the contralateral ear.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binaural hearing; cochlear implant; interaural time difference; single-sided deafness

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30264229      PMCID: PMC6249156          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-018-00697-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  54 in total

1.  Sensitivity of bimodal listeners to interaural time differences with modulated single- and multiple-channel stimuli.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Anneke Lenssen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Cochlear implantation in unilateral deaf subjects associated with ipsilateral tinnitus.

Authors:  Andreas Buechner; Martina Brendel; Anke Lesinski-Schiedat; Gentiana Wenzel; Carolin Frohne-Buechner; Burkard Jaeger; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Interaural stimulation timing in single sided deaf cochlear implant users.

Authors:  S Zirn; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; T Wesarg
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Converging measures of binaural detection yield estimates of precision of coding of interaural temporal disparities.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Corey Stoelb; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing.

Authors:  Becky B Poon; Donald K Eddington; Victor Noel; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects.

Authors:  R J van Hoesel; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  On the minimum audible angle--a decision theory approach.

Authors:  W M Hartmann; B Raked
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject.

Authors:  R J van Hoesel; Y C Tong; R D Hollow; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Outcomes after cochlear implantation for patients with single-sided deafness, including those with recalcitrant Ménière's disease.

Authors:  Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Camille Dunn
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  13 in total

1.  Sensitivity to binaural temporal-envelope beats with single-sided deafness and a cochlear implant as a measure of tonotopic match (L).

Authors:  Coral E Dirks; Peggy B Nelson; Matthew B Winn; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Counting or discriminating the number of voices to assess binaural fusion with single-sided vocoders.

Authors:  Jessica M Wess; Nathaniel J Spencer; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Mechanisms of Localization and Speech Perception with Colocated and Spatially Separated Noise and Speech Maskers Under Single-Sided Deafness with a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Coral Dirks; Peggy B Nelson; Douglas P Sladen; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  Considerations for Fitting Cochlear Implants Bimodally and to the Single-Sided Deaf.

Authors:  Sabrina H Pieper; Noura Hamze; Stefan Brill; Sabine Hochmuth; Mats Exter; Marek Polak; Andreas Radeloff; Michael Buschermöhle; Mathias Dietz
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

5.  A Comparison of Place-Pitch-Based Interaural Electrode Matching Methods for Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Kenneth K Jensen; Stefano Cosentino; Joshua G W Bernstein; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  No Benefit of Deriving Cochlear-Implant Maps From Binaural Temporal-Envelope Sensitivity for Speech Perception or Spatial Hearing Under Single-Sided Deafness.

Authors:  Coral E Dirks; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Kevin Xu; Shelby Willis; Quinton Gopen; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Interaural Place-of-Stimulation Mismatch Estimates Using CT Scans and Binaural Perception, But Not Pitch, Are Consistent in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Kenneth K Jensen; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Jack H Noble; Michael Hoa; H Jeffery Kim; Robert Shih; Elizabeth Kolberg; Miranda Cleary; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 6.709

9.  Reducing the Device Delay Mismatch Can Improve Sound Localization in Bimodal Cochlear Implant/Hearing-Aid Users.

Authors:  Stefan Zirn; Julian Angermeier; Susan Arndt; Antje Aschendorff; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Spatial Speech-in-Noise Performance in Bimodal and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Ben Williges; Thomas Wesarg; Lorenz Jung; Leontien I Geven; Andreas Radeloff; Tim Jürgens
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.