Literature DB >> 33136630

Binaural Pitch Fusion in Children With Normal Hearing, Hearing Aids, and Cochlear Implants.

Curtis L Hartling1, Jennifer R Fowler1, Gemaine N Stark1, Bess Glickman1, Morgan Eddolls1, Yonghee Oh1, Katrina Ramsey2, Lina A J Reiss1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Binaural pitch fusion is the perceptual integration of stimuli that evoke different pitches between the ears into a single auditory image. Adults who use hearing aids (HAs) or cochlear implants (CIs) often experience abnormally broad binaural pitch fusion, such that sounds differing in pitch by as much as 3 to 4 octaves are fused across ears, leading to spectral averaging and speech perception interference. The main goal of this study was to measure binaural pitch fusion in children with different hearing device combinations and compare results across groups and with adults. A second goal was to examine the relationship of binaural pitch fusion to interaural pitch differences or pitch match range, a measure of sequential pitch discriminability.
DESIGN: Binaural pitch fusion was measured in children between the ages of 6.1 and 11.1 years with bilateral HAs (n = 9), bimodal CI (n = 10), bilateral CIs (n = 17), as well as normal-hearing (NH) children (n = 21). Depending on device combination, stimuli were pure tones or electric pulse trains delivered to individual electrodes. Fusion ranges were measured using simultaneous, dichotic presentation of reference and comparison stimuli in opposite ears, and varying the comparison stimulus to find the range that fused with the reference stimulus. Interaural pitch match functions were measured using sequential presentation of reference and comparison stimuli, and varying the comparison stimulus to find the pitch match center and range.
RESULTS: Children with bilateral HAs had significantly broader binaural pitch fusion than children with NH, bimodal CI, or bilateral CIs. Children with NH and bilateral HAs, but not children with bimodal or bilateral CIs, had significantly broader fusion than adults with the same hearing status and device configuration. In children with bilateral CIs, fusion range was correlated with several variables that were also correlated with each other: pure-tone average in the second implanted ear before CI, and duration of prior bilateral HA, bimodal CI, or bilateral CI experience. No relationship was observed between fusion range and pitch match differences or range.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that binaural pitch fusion is still developing in this age range and depends on hearing device combination but not on interaural pitch differences or discriminability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33136630      PMCID: PMC9014818          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.562


  41 in total

1.  Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ginger S Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Young children do not integrate visual and haptic form information.

Authors:  Monica Gori; Michela Del Viva; Giulio Sandini; David C Burr
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Effects of lower frequency-to-electrode allocations on speech and pitch perception with the hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Ann E Perreau; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Benefits of bilateral cochlear implants and/or hearing aids in children.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Patti M Johnstone; Shelly P Godar
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Depth of electrode insertion and postoperative performance in humans with cochlear implants: a histopathologic study.

Authors:  Joonhan Lee; Joseph B Nadol; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Richard S Tyler; Shelley A Witt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Development of auditory processing in 6- to 11-yr-old children.

Authors:  David R Moore; Justin A Cowan; Alison Riley; A Mark Edmondson-Jones; Melanie A Ferguson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The effects of bilateral electric and bimodal electric--acoustic stimulation on language development.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Christopher Chapman
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-08-26

9.  Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Binaural fusion and listening effort in children who use bilateral cochlear implants: a psychoacoustic and pupillometric study.

Authors:  Morrison M Steel; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Frequency Fitting Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithm in Cochlear Implant Users with Bimodal Binaural Hearing.

Authors:  Alexis Saadoun; Antoine Schein; Vincent Péan; Pierrick Legrand; Ludwig Serge Aho Glélé; Alexis Bozorg Grayeli
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-02-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.